| Literature DB >> 24878810 |
Laura-Ancuţa Pop1, Emil Puscas2, Valentina Pileczki3, Roxana Cojocneanu-Petric4, Cornelia Braicu5, Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu6, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe7.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NSG) is an important method for gathering large amounts of sequencing data for different types of applications regarding the diagnosis and response to treatment of different diseases. An important step in the NGS process is the quality control of sequencing libraries, which can influence the yield and efficiency of the sequencing run. This study evaluated two different methods for library quality control, Agilent Bioanalyzer and qPCR, and showed that both methods can be used. However, as is the case with any analytical method, they have their limitations. The Agilent Bioanalyzer quantifies only the high quality libraries, but it underestimates their concentration, while qPCR also quantifies lower quality libraries, but it overestimates their concentration.Keywords: Agilent Bioanalyzer; breast cancer; qPCR; sequencing libraries
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24878810 DOI: 10.3233/CBM-130358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Biomark ISSN: 1574-0153 Impact factor: 4.388