Literature DB >> 24878672

Comparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Neslihan Simsek1, Ali Keles1, Fuat Ahmetoglu1, Mevlüt Sinan Ocak1, Saim Yologlu2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two retreatment techniques, in terms of the operating time and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results, in removing three different root canal sealers from root canals that were previously filled with gutta-percha. Sixty extracted single-rooted human premolars were divided into three groups and filled with iRoot SP, MM Seal, and AH Plus sealers, along with gutta-percha, through a lateral compaction technique. Root canal fillings of the samples were removed by ESI ultrasonic tips or R-Endo files. The time to reach the working length was recorded. Longitudinally sectioned samples were examined under SEM magnification. Each picture was evaluated in terms of the residual debris. Data were statistically analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis test. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of operating time (p>0.05). Significant differences in the number of debris-free dentinal tubules were found among the root canal thirds, but this finding was not influenced by the experimental group (p<0.05). Resin sealer tags were observed inside the dentinal tubules in the MM Seal group. Under the conditions of this study, it may be established that there was no difference among the sealers and retreatment techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878672     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  9 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of retreatability of bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin (AH Plus) sealer with two different retreatment files: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Harakh Chand Baranwal; Neelam Mittal; Riya Garg; Jyoti Yadav; Prachi Rani
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2021-07-05

2.  Retreatability of Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-Percha with Bioceramic, MTA and Resin-Based Sealers.

Authors:  Emel Uzunoglu; Zeliha Yilmaz; Derya Deniz Sungur; Emre Altundasar
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2015-03-18

3.  3D analysis of D-RaCe and self-adjusting file in removing filling materials from curved root canals instrumented and filled with different techniques.

Authors:  Neslihan Simsek; Fuat Ahmetoglu; Ali Keles; Elcin Tekin Bulut; Kursat Er
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-09

4.  Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mohammadian; Farzad Farahanimastary; Fatemeh Dibaji; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Genotoxicity, Bioactivity and Clinical Properties of Calcium Silicate Based Sealers: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Farnaz Jafari; Sanaz Jafari; Paria Etesamnia
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

6.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Supportive Removal of Root Canal Filling Material.

Authors:  Taha Özyürek; Ebru Özsezer Demiryürek
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2016-12-26

7.  Retreatability of root canals filled with Gutta percha and a novel bioceramic sealer: A scanning electron microscopy study.

Authors:  Flora Kakoura; Ourania Pantelidou
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

8.  Efficiency Evaluation of Various Solvents in Retreatment of Endodontic Filling in Extracted Teeth.

Authors:  Adriana Katunarić; Petra Dijanić; Danijela Jurić Kaćunić; Jurica Matijević; Nada Galić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2022-03

9.  Efficiency of reciprocating systems reciprocated at different angles in removing root-canals fillings with an MTA-type sealer: an Ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Ahmad A Madarati; Aya M N Sammani; Ahmad A Alnazzawi; Ali Alrahlah; Eugenio Pedullà
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.747

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.