Literature DB >> 24878624

Navigated high frequency ultrasound: description of technique and clinical comparison with conventional intracranial ultrasound.

Jan Coburger1, Ralph W König2, Angelika Scheuerle3, Jens Engelke2, Michal Hlavac2, Dietmar R Thal3, Christian Rainer Wirtz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Conventional curved or sector array ultrasound (cioUS) is the most commonly used intraoperative imaging modality worldwide. Although highly beneficial in various clinical applications, at present the impact of linear array intraoperative ultrasound (lioUS) has not been assessed for intracranial use. We provide a technical description to integrate an independent lioUS probe into a commercially available neuronavigation system and evaluate the use of navigated lioUS as a resection control in glioblastoma surgery.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study assessing residual tumor detection after complete microsurgical resection using either cioUS or lioUS in 15 consecutive patients. We compared the imaging findings of both ultrasound modalities in 44 sites surrounding the resection cavity. The respective findings were correlated with the histopathologic findings of tissue specimen obtained from those sites.
RESULTS: Use of cioUS leaded to an additional resection in 9 patients, whereas lioUS detected residual tumor during all surgeries. A further resection was performed at 33 of 44 intraoperative sites (75%) based on results of lioUS alone. Resected tissue was solid tumor in 66% and infiltration zone in 34%. No false-positive or false-negative findings were seen using lioUS. There was no case of a tumor detection in cioUS combined with a negative finding in lioUS. The difference of imaging results between cioUS and lioUS was significant (sign test, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: lioUS can be used as a safe and precise tool for intracranial image-guided resection control of glioblastomas. It can be integrated in a commercially available navigation system and shows a significant higher detection rate of residual tumor compared with conventional cioUS.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral tumor; Extent of resection; Glioma; High frequency ultrasound imaging; Ultrasound; cioUS; iMRI; lioUS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878624     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  11 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of linear array intraoperative ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery: a comparative study with high field intraoperative MRI and conventional sector array ultrasound.

Authors:  Jan Coburger; Angelika Scheuerle; Thomas Kapapa; Jens Engelke; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Christian R Wirtz; Ralph König
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Experimental study of sector and linear array ultrasound accuracy and the influence of navigated 3D-reconstruction as compared to MRI in a brain tumor model.

Authors:  Max Siekmann; Thomas Lothes; Ralph König; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Jan Coburger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The influence of intraoperative resection control modalities on survival following gross total resection of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marian C Neidert; Isabel C Hostettler; Jan-Karl Burkhardt; Malte Mohme; Ulrike Held; Reto Kofmehl; Günter Eisele; Christoph M Woernle; Luca Regli; Oliver Bozinov
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  3D intra-operative ultrasound and MR image guidance: pursuing an ultrasound-based management of brainshift to enhance neuronavigation.

Authors:  Marco Riva; Christoph Hennersperger; Fausto Milletari; Amin Katouzian; Federico Pessina; Benjamin Gutierrez-Becker; Antonella Castellano; Nassir Navab; Lorenzo Bello
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Cranial sonolucent prosthesis: a window of opportunity for neuro-oncology (and neuro-surgery).

Authors:  Massimiliano Del Bene; Luca Raspagliesi; Giovanni Carone; Paola Gaviani; Antonio Silvani; Luigi Solbiati; Francesco Prada; Francesco DiMeco
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Surgical oncology for gliomas: the state of the art.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  New Hope in Brain Glioma Surgery: The Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound. A Review.

Authors:  Maria Angela Pino; Alessia Imperato; Irene Musca; Rosario Maugeri; Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva; Gabriele Costantino; Francesca Graziano; Francesco Meli; Natale Francaviglia; Domenico Gerardo Iacopino; Alessandro Villa
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 8.  Application of Multiparametric Intraoperative Ultrasound in Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Ji Shi; Ye Zhang; Bing Yao; Peixin Sun; Yuanyuan Hao; Haozhe Piao; Xi Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Current Limitations of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Tumor Surgery.

Authors:  Andrej Šteňo; Ján Buvala; Veronika Babková; Adrián Kiss; David Toma; Alexander Lysak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  State-of-the-art imaging for glioma surgery.

Authors:  Niels Verburg; Philip C de Witt Hamer
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.