Literature DB >> 24878615

Dispersion assessment in the location of facial landmarks on photographs.

B R Campomanes-Álvarez1, O Ibáñez, F Navarro, I Alemán, O Cordón, S Damas.   

Abstract

The morphological assessment of facial features using photographs has played an important role in forensic anthropology. The analysis of anthropometric landmarks for determining facial dimensions and angles has been considered in diverse forensic areas. Hence, the quantification of the error associated to the location of facial landmarks seems to be necessary when photographs become a key element of the forensic procedure. In this work, we statistically evaluate the inter- and intra-observer dispersions related to the facial landmark identification on photographs. In the inter-observer experiment, a set of 18 facial landmarks was provided to 39 operators. They were requested to mark only those that they could precisely place on 10 photographs with different poses (frontal, oblique, and lateral views). The frequency of landmark location was studied together with their dispersion. Regarding the intra-observer evaluation, three participants identified 13 facial points on five photographs classified in the frontal and oblique views. Each landmark location was repeated five times at intervals of at least 24 h. The frequency results reveal that glabella, nasion, subnasale, labiale superius, and pogonion obtained the highest location frequency in the three image categories. On the contrary, the lowest rate corresponds to labiale inferius and menton. Meanwhile, zygia, gonia, and gnathion were significantly more difficult to locate than other facial landmarks. They produced a significant effect on the dispersion depending on the pose of the image where they were placed, regardless of the type of observer that positioned them. In particular, zygia and gonia presented a statistically greater variation in the three image poses, while the location of gnathion is less precise in oblique view photographs. Hence, our findings suggest that the latter landmarks tend to be highly variable when determining their exact position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878615     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1002-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  9 in total

1.  The application of anthropometric indices in forensic photography: three case studies.

Authors:  R A Halberstein
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 2.  Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry.

Authors:  Tania S Douglas
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 3.  Age synthesis and estimation via faces: a survey.

Authors:  Yun Fu; Guodong Guo; Thomas S Huang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications.

Authors:  Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel; Brenda C Frazier; Marta Mirazón Lahr
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.

Authors:  Ann H Ross; Shanna Williams
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.832

6.  Pitfalls at the root of facial assessment on photographs: a quantitative study of accuracy in positioning facial landmarks.

Authors:  M Cummaudo; M Guerzoni; L Marasciuolo; D Gibelli; A Cigada; Z Obertovà; M Ratnayake; P Poppa; P Gabriel; S Ritz-Timme; C Cattaneo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey.

Authors:  W A Aulsebrook; M Y Işcan; J H Slabbert; P Becker
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1995-10-30       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?

Authors:  L G Farkas; W Bryson; J Klotz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry.

Authors:  Jodi Caple; Carl N Stephan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Three-dimensional analyses of aging-induced alterations in facial shape: a longitudinal study of 171 Japanese males.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Imaizumi; Kei Taniguchi; Yoshinori Ogawa; Kazutoshi Matsuzaki; Takeshi Nagata; Masaaki Mochimaru; Makiko Kouchi
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Ground truth data generation for skull-face overlay.

Authors:  O Ibáñez; F Cavalli; B R Campomanes-Álvarez; C Campomanes-Álvarez; A Valsecchi; M I Huete
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Measurement error in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  Scan time, reliability and accuracy of craniofacial measurements using a 3D light scanner.

Authors:  Camilla Franco de Sá Gomes; Mylena Ranieri Libdy; David Normando
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-07-07

Review 6.  An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging.

Authors:  Carl N Stephan; Jodi M Caple; Pierre Guyomarc'h; Peter Claes
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  Improving the Treatment Outcome of Naso-Orbito-Ethmoido-Maxillary Fractures Using Virtual Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Data.

Authors:  Andrei-Mihail Roșu; Daniela Șulea; Geanina Bandol; Bogdan Mihail Cobzeanu; Liliana Moisii; Florentina Severin; Luiza-Maria Cobzeanu; Dragoș Negru; Oana Cristina Roșu; Dragoș Octavian Palade; Victor Vlad Costan; Mihail Dan Cobzeanu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.