Literature DB >> 24878297

Differences in coping, self-efficacy, and external control beliefs between patients at-risk for psychosis and patients with first-episode psychosis.

Stefanie J Schmidt1, Vera-Maria Grunert2, Benno G Schimmelmann2, Frauke Schultze-Lutter2, Chantal Michel2.   

Abstract

Patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) often show dysfunctional coping patterns, low self-efficacy, and external control beliefs that are considered to be risk factors for the development of psychosis. Therefore, these factors should already be present in patients at-risk for psychosis (AR). We compared frequencies of deficits in coping strategies (Stress-Coping-Questionnaires, SVF-120/SVF-KJ), self-efficacy, and control beliefs (Competence and Control Beliefs Questionnaire, FKK) between AR (n=21) and FEP (n=22) patients using a cross-sectional design. Correlations among coping, self-efficacy, and control beliefs were assessed in both groups. The majority of AR and FEP patients demonstrated deficits in coping skills, self-efficacy, and control beliefs. However, AR patients more frequently reported a lack of positive coping strategies, low self-efficacy, and a fatalistic externalizing bias. In contrast, FEP patients were characterized by being overly self-confident. These findings suggest that dysfunctional coping, self-efficacy, and control beliefs are already evident in AR patients, though different from those in FEP patients. The pattern of deficits in AR patients closely resembles that of depressive patients, which may reflect high levels of depressiveness in AR patients. Apart from being worthwhile treatment targets, these coping and belief patterns are promising candidates for predicting outcome in AR patients, including the conversion to psychosis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attribution; Locus of control; Prodrome; Psychosis; Self-confidence; Self-esteem; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878297     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  5 in total

1.  Prediction and prevention of psychosis: current progress and future tasks.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Stefanie J Schmidt; Nathalie Kaiser; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Impact of Depression, Resilience, and Locus of Control on Adjustment of Health-Related Expectations in Aging Individuals With Chronic Illness.

Authors:  Aline Schönenberg; Hannah M Zipprich; Ulrike Teschner; Tino Prell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Psychosocial characteristics differentiate non-distressing and distressing voices in 10,346 adolescents.

Authors:  Else-Marie Løberg; Rolf Gjestad; Maj-Britt Posserud; Kristiina Kompus; Astri J Lundervold
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  The effects of intensive home treatment on self-efficacy in patients recovering from a psychiatric crisis.

Authors:  Ansam Barakat; Matthijs Blankers; Jurgen E Cornelis; Nick M Lommerse; Aartjan T F Beekman; Jack J M Dekker
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  Depression predicts persistence of paranoia in clinical high-risk patients to psychosis: results of the EPOS project.

Authors:  Raimo K R Salokangas; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Jarmo Hietala; Markus Heinimaa; Tiina From; Tuula Ilonen; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Heinrich Graf von Reventlow; Georg Juckel; Don Linszen; Peter Dingemans; Max Birchwood; Paul Patterson; Joachim Klosterkötter; Stephan Ruhrmann
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.328

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.