Literature DB >> 24878294

Systematic review of the prevalence and characteristics of battle casualties from NATO coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Rigo Hoencamp1, Eric Vermetten2, Edward C T H Tan3, Hein Putter4, Luke P H Leenen5, Jaap F Hamming6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) coalition forces remain heavily committed on combat operations overseas. Understanding the prevalence and characteristics of battlefield injury of coalition partners is vital to combat casualty care performance improvement. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of battle casualties from NATO coalition partners in Iraq and Afghanistan. The primary outcome was mechanism of injury and the secondary outcome anatomical distribution of wounds.
METHODS: This systematic review was performed based on all cohort studies concerning prevalence and characteristics of battlefield injury of coalition forces from Iraq and Afghanistan up to December 20th 2013. Studies were rated on the level of evidence provided according to criteria by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine in Oxford. The methodological quality of observational comparative studies was assessed by the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: Eight published articles, encompassing a total of n=19,750 battle casualties, were systematically analyzed to achieve a summated outcome. There was heterogeneity among the included studies and there were major differences in inclusion and exclusion criteria regarding the target population among the included trials, introducing bias. The overall distribution in mechanism of injury was 18% gunshot wounds, 72% explosions and other 10%. The overall anatomical distribution of wounds was head and neck 31%, truncal 27%, extremity 39% and other 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of injury and anatomical distribution of wounds observed in the published articles by NATO coalition partners regarding Iraq and Afghanistan differ from previous campaigns. There was a significant increase in the use of explosive mechanisms and a significant increase in the head and neck region compared with previous wars.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Battle; Combat; Explosive; Military; Systematic review; Wound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878294     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  22 in total

1.  [Evaluation of interest in research among surgically active medical officers in the German Armed Forces].

Authors:  D A Back; H G Palm; A Willms; A Westerfeld; D Hinck; C Schulze; L Brodauf; D Bieler; M A Küper
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Comparison of the non-mortal gunshot and handmade explosive blast traumas during a low-intensity conflict on urban terrain.

Authors:  Hikmet Erhan Güven; Sedat Bilge; Ali Attila Aydın; Mehmet Eryılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

3.  Small molecule inhibition of non-canonical (TAK1-mediated) BMP signaling results in reduced chondrogenic ossification and heterotopic ossification in a rat model of blast-associated combat-related lower limb trauma.

Authors:  Amy L Strong; Philip J Spreadborough; Chase A Pagani; Ryan M Haskins; Devaveena Dey; Patrick D Grimm; Keiko Kaneko; Simone Marini; Amanda K Huber; Charles Hwang; Kenneth Westover; Yuji Mishina; Matthew J Bradley; Benjamin Levi; Thomas A Davis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Gunshot and blast injuries of the extremities: a review of 45 cases.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ignatiadis; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Vasilios G Igoumenou; Vasilios D Polyzois; Vasiliki A Tsiampa; Dimitrios K Arapoglou; Sarantis Spyridonos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-11-29

5.  Impact of explosive devices in modern armed conflicts: in-depth analysis of Dutch battle casualties in southern Afghanistan.

Authors:  Rigo Hoencamp; Eelco P Huizinga; Thijs T C F van Dongen; Floris J Idenburg; Arul Ramasamy; Luke P H Leenen; Jaap F Hamming
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Hemothorax: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jacob Zeiler; Steven Idell; Scott Norwood; Alan Cook
Journal:  Clin Pulm Med       Date:  2020-01-10

7.  Impact of a novel phosphoinositol-3 kinase inhibitor in preventing mitochondrial DNA damage and damage-associated molecular pattern accumulation: Results from the Biochronicity Project.

Authors:  George Edward Black; Kyle K Sokol; Donald M Moe; Jon D Simmons; David Muscat; Victor Pastukh; Gina Capley; Olena Gorodnya; Mykhaylo Ruchko; Mark B Roth; Mark Gillespie; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Can We Train Military Surgeons in a Civilian Trauma Center?

Authors:  H Uchino; V Y Kong; G V Oosthuizen; J L Bruce; W Bekker; G L Laing; D L Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Compared with Limb Salvage Following Major Upper-Extremity Trauma.

Authors:  Stuart L Mitchell; Roman Hayda; Andrew T Chen; Anthony R Carlini; James R Ficke; Ellen J MacKenzie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  INJURIES OF BOKO HARAM INSURGENCY IN SOUTH-EAST NIGER REPUBLIC.

Authors:  R Sani; H Adamou; H Daddy; Magagi I Amodou; M B Adoulaye; L Didier James; I Garba; K Idé; Y Hama; S Sanoussi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.