Literature DB >> 24878290

Intraoperative cortico-cortical evoked potentials for the evaluation of language function during brain tumor resection: initial experience with 13 cases.

Taiichi Saito1, Manabu Tamura, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Takashi Maruyama, Yuichi Kubota, Satoko Fukuchi, Masayuki Nitta, Mikhail Chernov, Saori Okamoto, Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Kaoru Kurisu, Kuniyoshi L Sakai, Yoshikazu Okada, Hiroshi Iseki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective in the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEP) monitoring for the intraoperative assessment of speech function during resection of brain tumors.
METHODS: Intraoperative monitoring of CCEP was applied in 13 patients (mean age 34 ± 14 years) during the removal of neoplasms located within or close to language-related structures in the dominant cerebral hemisphere. For this purpose strip electrodes were positioned above the frontal language area (FLA) and temporal language area (TLA), which were identified with direct cortical stimulation and/or preliminary mapping with the use of implanted chronic subdural grid electrodes. The CCEP response was defined as the highest observed negative peak in either direction of stimulation. In 12 cases the tumor was resected during awake craniotomy.
RESULTS: An intraoperative CCEP response was not obtained in one case because of technical problems. In the other patients it was identified from the FLA during stimulation of the TLA (7 cases) and from the TLA during stimulation of the FLA (5 cases), with a mean peak latency of 83 ± 15 msec. During tumor resection the CCEP response was unchanged in 5 cases, decreased in 4, and disappeared in 3. Postoperatively, all 7 patients with a decreased or absent CCEP response after lesion removal experienced deterioration in speech function. In contrast, in 5 cases with an unchanged intraoperative CCEP response, speaking abilities after surgery were preserved at the preoperative level, except in one patient who experienced not dysphasia, but dysarthria due to pyramidal tract injury. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The time required to recover speech function was also significantly associated with the type of intraoperative change in CCEP recordings (p < 0.01) and was, on average, 1.8 ± 1.0, 5.5 ± 1.0, and 11.0 ± 3.6 months, respectively, if the response was unchanged, was decreased, or had disappeared.
CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring CCEP is feasible during the resection of brain tumors affecting language-related cerebral structures. In the intraoperative evaluation of speech function, it can be a helpful adjunct or can be used in its direct assessment with cortical and subcortical mapping during awake craniotomy. It can also be used to predict the prognosis of language disorders after surgery and decide on the optimal resection of a neoplasm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCEP = cortico-cortical evoked potentials; ECoG = electrocorticography; FLA = frontal language area; TLA = temporal language area; awake craniotomy; brain tumor; cortico-cortical evoked potentials; diagnostic and operative techniques; language function; oncology; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878290     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.JNS131195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  17 in total

1.  Clinical impact of intraoperative CCEP monitoring in evaluating the dorsal language white matter pathway.

Authors:  Yukihiro Yamao; Kengo Suzuki; Takeharu Kunieda; Riki Matsumoto; Yoshiki Arakawa; Takuro Nakae; Sei Nishida; Rika Inano; Sumiya Shibata; Akihiro Shimotake; Takayuki Kikuchi; Nobukatsu Sawamoto; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Akio Ikeda; Hidenao Fukuyama; Susumu Miyamoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Impact of connectivity between the pars triangularis and orbitalis on identifying the frontal language area in patients with dominant frontal gliomas.

Authors:  Taiichi Saito; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Manabu Tamura; Takashi Maruyama; Masayuki Nitta; Shunsuke Tsuzuki; Takakazu Kawamata
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  The Use of Standardized Intraoperative Language Tests in Awake Craniotomies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christos Papatzalas; Kostas Fountas; Eftychia Kapsalaki; Ilias Papathanasiou
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 4.  Neuromonitoring of the language pathways using cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oleg Titov; Andrey Bykanov; David Pitskhelauri; Gleb Danilov
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Functional Approaches to the Surgery of Brain Gliomas.

Authors:  Davide Giampiccolo; Sonia Nunes; Luigi Cattaneo; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2022

6.  Construction of brain area risk map for decision making using surgical navigation and motor evoked potential monitoring information.

Authors:  Tomoko Yamaguchi; Atsushi Kuwano; Toshihiko Koyama; Jun Okamoto; Shigeyuki Suzuki; Hideki Okuda; Taiichi Saito; Ken Masamune; Yoshihiro Muragaki
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Functional differences among stimulation-identified cortical naming sites in the temporal region.

Authors:  Marla J Hamberger; Michele Miozzo; Catherine A Schevon; Chris Morrison; Chad Carlson; Ashesh D Mehta; Gad E Klein; Guy M McKhann; Alicia C Williams
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 8.  Single pulse electrical stimulation to probe functional and pathological connectivity in epilepsy.

Authors:  Riki Matsumoto; Takeharu Kunieda; Dileep Nair
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.184

9.  A quantitative method for evaluating cortical responses to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Lawrence J Crowther; Peter Brunner; Christoph Kapeller; Christoph Guger; Kyousuke Kamada; Marjorie E Bunch; Bridget K Frawley; Timothy M Lynch; Anthony L Ritaccio; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  MRIES: A Matlab Toolbox for Mapping the Responses to Intracranial Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Kaijia Sun; Haixiang Wang; Yunxian Bai; Wenjing Zhou; Liang Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.