Literature DB >> 24878289

Relevance of early head CT scans following neurosurgical procedures: an analysis of 892 intracranial procedures at Rush University Medical Center.

Ricardo B V Fontes1, Adam P Smith, Lorenzo F Muñoz, Richard W Byrne, Vincent C Traynelis.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Early postoperative head CT scanning is routinely performed following intracranial procedures for detection of complications, but its real value remains uncertain: so-called abnormal results are frequently found, but active, emergency intervention based on these findings may be rare. The authors' objective was to analyze whether early postoperative CT scans led to emergency surgical interventions and if the results of neurological examination predicted this occurrence.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 892 intracranial procedures followed by an early postoperative CT scan performed over a 1-year period at Rush University Medical Center and classified these cases according to postoperative neurological status: baseline, predicted neurological change, unexpected neurological change, and sedated or comatose. The interpretation of CT results was reviewed and unexpected CT findings were classified based on immediate action taken: Type I, additional observation and CT; Type II, active nonsurgical intervention; and Type III, surgical intervention. Results were compared between neurological examination groups with the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Patients with unexpected neurological changes or in the sedated or comatose group had significantly more unexpected findings on the postoperative CT (p < 0.001; OR 19.2 and 2.3, respectively) and Type II/III interventions (p < 0.001) than patients at baseline. Patients at baseline or with expected neurological changes still had a rate of Type II/III changes in the 2.2%-2.4% range; however, no patient required an immediate return to the operating room.
CONCLUSIONS: Over a 1-year period in an academic neurosurgery service, no patient who was neurologically intact or who had a predicted neurological change required an immediate return to the operating room based on early postoperative CT findings. Obtaining early CT scans should not be a priority in these patients and may even be cancelled in favor of MRI studies, if the latter have already been planned and can be performed safely and in a timely manner. Early postoperative CT scanning does not assure an uneventful course, nor should it replace accurate and frequent neurological checks, because operative interventions were always decided in conjunction with the neurological examination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICU = intensive care unit; RUMC = Rush University Medical Center; TBI = traumatic brain injury; computed tomography; craniotomy; radiography; reoperation; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878289     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.JNS132429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  4 in total

Review 1.  Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  Lukas Blumrich; João Paulo Mota Telles; Saul Almeida da Silva; Ricardo Ferrareto Iglesio; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  The Utility of Routine Intensive Care Admission for Patients Undergoing Intracranial Neurosurgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar Cimonari de Almeida; M Dustin Boone; Yosef Laviv; Burkhard S Kasper; Clark C Chen; Ekkehard M Kasper
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Short-term outcomes of three rare cases of intramucosal Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Rui Cheng; Yao Xu; Bing Yue
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.573

4.  No Routine Postoperative Head CT following Elective Craniotomy--A Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  Ralph T Schär; Michael Fiechter; Werner J Z'Graggen; Nicole Söll; Vladimir Krejci; Roland Wiest; Andreas Raabe; Jürgen Beck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.