Literature DB >> 24878270

Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.

Hiroshi Nomura1, Yoshikazu Yanagisawa, Junichi Arima, Masayoshi Oga.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors sought to quantify the clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). They performed a microscopic laminectomy in which the spinous process is split longitudinally into 2 halves. For single-level decompression, they inserted a tubular retractor between the split process.
METHODS: Data obtained in a total of 124 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the "slip" group, comprising patients with spondylolisthesis-type LSS with vertebral body slippage (Group 1), and the "nonslip" group, comprising patients with spondylosis-type LSS without vertebral body slippage or with LSS due to central protrusion of lumbar disc herniation. Clinical outcome in all patients was evaluated by using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. In the slip group, slippage and instability rates were evaluated by using pre- and postoperative dynamic radiographs in the sagittal plane. Postoperative CT images were used to evaluate bony union at 2 sites: a region between the left and right portions of the halved spinous process and a region between the base of the halved process and vertebral arch. Signal intensity of the multifidus muscle at individual decompression levels was evaluated on pre- and postoperative T1- and T2-weighted MR images.
RESULTS: Preoperative clinical symptoms improved significantly after surgery in all patients. Slippage and instability rates in the slip group showed no significant differences when pre- and postoperative conditions were compared. Union rates at the region between the left and right portions of the halved process and the region between the base of the halved process and vertebral arch were 97.1% and 82.5%, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging showed only a small amount of fat infiltration in the multifidus muscle after surgery in 12.2% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy as a promising minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of LSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; LBP = low-back pain; LSPSL = lumbar spinous process–splitting laminectomy; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; METRx microdiscectomy system; MILD = muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression; lumbar spinal stenosis; lumbar spinous process–splitting laminectomy; minimally invasive surgery; tubular retractor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878270     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE1373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  8 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Patrick Belton; Hekmat Zarzour; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

2.  A novel strategy of non-fusion instrumentation with coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nomura
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

3.  Prognostic Factors of Surgical Outcome after Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Keishi Maruo; Toshiya Tachibana; Shinichi Inoue; Fumihiro Arizumi; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

4.  Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.

Authors:  Seung Myung Wi; Hui Jong Lee; Sam Yeol Chang; Oh Hyo Kwon; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Hyoungmin Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 5.  Development and Achievement of Cervical Laminoplasty and Related Studies on Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Shigeru Hirabayashi; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Iwao Yamamoto; Kazuaki Yamada; Hirotaka Kawano
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-07-10

6.  Surgical outcomes between posterior decompression alone and posterior decompression with fusion surgery among patients with Meyerding grade 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Keiichiro Tozawa; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; So Kato; Toru Doi; Yuki Taniguchi; Yudai Kumanomido; Akiro Higashikawa; Yuichi Yosihida; Naohiro Kawamura; Katsuyuki Sasaki; Seiichi Azuma; Jim Yu; Nobuhiro Hara; Masaaki Iizuka; Takashi Ono; Masayoshi Fukushima; Yujiro Takeshita; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Comparison of Modified Marmot Surgery and Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Two-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Keisuke Masuda; Hideki Shigematsu; Masato Tanaka; Sachiko Kawasaki; Yuma Suga; Yusuke Yamamoto; Eiichiro Iwata; Akinori Okuda; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-10-22

8.  The effect of preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis on postoperative outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A single-center cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Yueliang Chang; Fubiao Zhou; Le Fei; Zili Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.