Literature DB >> 24877735

The competing benefits of noise and heterogeneity in neural coding.

Eric Hunsberger1, Matthew Scott, Chris Eliasmith.   

Abstract

Noise and heterogeneity are both known to benefit neural coding. Stochastic resonance describes how noise, in the form of random fluctuations in a neuron's membrane voltage, can improve neural representations of an input signal. Neuronal heterogeneity refers to variation in any one of a number of neuron parameters and is also known to increase the information content of a population. We explore the interaction between noise and heterogeneity and find that their benefits to neural coding are not independent. Specifically, a neuronal population better represents an input signal when either noise or heterogeneity is added, but adding both does not always improve representation further. To explain this phenomenon, we propose that noise and heterogeneity operate using two shared mechanisms: (1) temporally desynchronizing the firing of neurons in the population and (2) linearizing the response of a population to a stimulus. We first characterize the effects of noise and heterogeneity on the information content of populations of either leaky integrate-and-fire or FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons. We then examine how the mechanisms of desynchronization and linearization produce these effects, and find that they work to distribute information equally across all neurons in the population in terms of both signal timing (desynchronization) and signal amplitude (linearization). Without noise or heterogeneity, all neurons encode the same aspects of the input signal; adding noise or heterogeneity allows neurons to encode complementary aspects of the input signal, thereby increasing information content. The simulations detailed in this letter highlight the importance of heterogeneity and noise in population coding, demonstrate their complex interactions in terms of the information content of neurons, and explain these effects in terms of underlying mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24877735     DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  18 in total

1.  Firing rate dynamics in recurrent spiking neural networks with intrinsic and network heterogeneity.

Authors:  Cheng Ly
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Variable synaptic strengths controls the firing rate distribution in feedforward neural networks.

Authors:  Cheng Ly; Gary Marsat
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Coding of time-dependent stimuli in homogeneous and heterogeneous neural populations.

Authors:  Manuel Beiran; Alexandra Kruscha; Jan Benda; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Noise promotes independent control of gamma oscillations and grid firing within recurrent attractor networks.

Authors:  Lukas Solanka; Mark C W van Rossum; Matthew F Nolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Random noise stimulation in the treatment of patients with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Mateo A Herrera-Murillo; Mario Treviño; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 6.058

6.  Experimentally Verified Parameter Sets for Modelling Heterogeneous Neocortical Pyramidal-Cell Populations.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Laurent Badel; Mark J Wall; Magnus J E Richardson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Racing to learn: statistical inference and learning in a single spiking neuron with adaptive kernels.

Authors:  Saeed Afshar; Libin George; Jonathan Tapson; André van Schaik; Tara J Hamilton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Diversity improves performance in excitable networks.

Authors:  Leonardo L Gollo; Mauro Copelli; James A Roberts
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Neuronal variability reflects probabilistic inference tuned to natural image statistics.

Authors:  Dylan Festa; Amir Aschner; Aida Davila; Adam Kohn; Ruben Coen-Cagli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Differential effects of excitatory and inhibitory heterogeneity on the gain and asynchronous state of sparse cortical networks.

Authors:  Jorge F Mejias; André Longtin
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.