Oxidative stress and inflammation are intertwined contributors to numerous acute vascular pathologies. A novel dual bioactive nanoparticle with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties was developed based on the interactions of tocopherol phosphate and the manganese porphyrin SOD mimetic, MnTMPyP. The size and drug incorporation efficiency were shown to be dependent on the amount of MnTMPyP added as well as the choice of surfactant. MnTMPyP was shown to retain its SOD-like activity while in intact particles and to release in a slow and controlled manner. Conjugation of anti-PECAM antibody to the nanoparticles provided endothelial targeting and potentiated nanoparticle-mediated suppression of inflammatory activation of these cells manifested by expression of VCAM, E-selectin, and IL-8. This nanoparticle technology may find applicability with drug combinations relevant for other pathologies.
Oxidative stress and inflammation are intertwined contributors to numerous acute vascular pathologies. A novel dual bioactive nanoparticle with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties was developed based on the interactions of tocopherol phosphate and the manganese porphyrin SOD mimetic, MnTMPyP. The size and drug incorporation efficiency were shown to be dependent on the amount of MnTMPyP added as well as the choice of surfactant. MnTMPyP was shown to retain its SOD-like activity while in intact particles and to release in a slow and controlled manner. Conjugation of anti-PECAM antibody to the nanoparticles provided endothelial targeting and potentiated nanoparticle-mediated suppression of inflammatory activation of these cells manifested by expression of VCAM, E-selectin, and IL-8. This nanoparticle technology may find applicability with drug combinations relevant for other pathologies.
Nanoparticles (NPs)
have numerous advantages as drug delivery carriers,
including enhanced drug solubility and stability, targeting ability,
and controlled drug release. One recent area of interest is the design
of nanoparticles that deliver multiple drugs simultaneously. Clinically,
use of multiple drugs is the standard of care for treatment of most
diseases. Drugs can be administered that target multiple pathways
or that are designed to act sequentially. Ideally, the result is additive
or even synergistic effects.[1,2] Ensuring that target
cells receive both drugs in comparison to just one (as might happen
if drugs or nanoparticles are just administered concomitantly) may
also prove beneficial.[3]The concept
of multidrug carriers has mostly been explored with
chemotherapeutic agents to date. Pharmacological management of acute
vascular inflammation and oxidative stress represents an alternative
scenario where this drug delivery approach may be highly advantageous.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated as both injurious
and proinflammatory signaling agents in vascular pathology.[4−6] In particular, endothelial cells that form the interphase monolayer
lining the luminal surface of blood vessels represent the key therapeutic
site for antioxidant and anti-inflammatory interventions in acute
pathological conditions, including ischemia/reperfusion and endotoxemia.[7−10]In the pathogenesis of these conditions [e.g., stroke, ischemia/reperfusion
(I/R), acute lung injury (ALI)], proinflammatory factors induce activation
of endothelial NADPH oxidase (Nox), triggering a flux of superoxide
anion (O2–) into the intracellular region.[11,12] Specifically, endosomal O2– is known
to activate the inflammatory NF-κB pathway, leading to the expression
of inducible adhesion molecules (e.g., VCAM-1),[13] enhanced permeability,[14] and
loss of the antithrombotic phenotype.[15] This leads to tissue injury and further aggravation and perpetuation
of the inflammatory cycle.[16] Therefore,
both oxidative and proinflammatory pathways are intertwined and mutually
propagate each other, providing an impetus for codelivery of antioxidants
and anti-inflammatory agents for treatment of acute inflammatory vascular
pathologies.This paper reports on a novel NP formulation, where
two bioactive
compounds, tocopherol phosphate (TP) and Mn(III)tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphyrin
(MnTMPyP), are combined to form an ion-pair complex that also acts
as the structural particle-forming material. The two components exhibit
complementary, but not identical, biological activities. Whereas MnTMPyP
is a manganese porphyrin superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic with strong
antioxidant effects,[17,18] TP—the phosphate derivative
of the α-tocopherol form of vitamin E—is thought to function
primarily as an anti-inflammatory signaling agent. Several studies
have reported TP to have activity independent of and surpassing of
α-tocopherol, including reducing expression of inflammatory
biomarkers,[19] inhibiting cell proliferation,[20,21] and increasing angiogenesis.[20] Combining
these two drugs creates the potential for synergistic biological activity
and simultaneously allows the particle properties to be readily controlled
by adjusting the ratio between the constituent pharmacophores. The
net effect is a NP with significant advantages from both pharmacologic
and pharmaceutical standpoints (Figure 1).
Figure 1
(A) Structures
of TPNa, MnTMPyP, and PF127. (B) Schematic of colloidal
aggregation and precipitation procedure used for the preparation of
bioactive NPs.
(A) Structures
of TPNa, MnTMPyP, and PF127. (B) Schematic of colloidal
aggregation and precipitation procedure used for the preparation of
bioactive NPs.While TP is highly water-soluble
in its sodium salt form, its precipitation
in the form of small, uniformly sized NPs when combined with MnTMPyP
in the presence of a surfactant, generally Pluronic F-127 (PF127),
obviates the need for incorporating biologically inactive excipients
(e.g., lipids, polymers). This in turn greatly enhances the therapeutic
payload of the formulation and reduces the dose required for achieving
a therapeutically adequate effect, potentially enhancing the translation
of these nanocarriers for clinical use.For endothelial targeting,
antibodies to the endothelial cell surface
determinant platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule, PECAM-1,
were attached to the surface of the NPs. PECAM is constitutively expressed
on the surface of endothelial cells at a level of ∼1 ×
106 copies/cell.[22] Nanocarriers
and proteins conjugated to anti-PECAM have previously been shown to
be delivered to endothelial cells in vitro and in intact animals.[23,24] Antioxidants delivered to endothelial cells using such PECAM-targeted
carriers exert protective effects in cell culture and animal models
of acute ROS-mediated endothelial pathology.[25−27]
Materials and
Methods
Reagents
TPNa, d-α-tocopherol poly(ethylene
glycol) 1000 succinate (TPGS), PF127, 1,3-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
(DCC), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol
(BHT), and methanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO). MnTMPyP was from Calbiochem (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). 6-Maleimidohexanoic
acid was from AK Scientific (Union City, CA). Succinimidyl 4-[N-maleimidiomethyl]cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) and N-succinimidyl S-acetylthioacetate (SATA)
were from Thermo Scientific Pierce (Rockford, IL). Streptavidin was
from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Mouse anti-PECAM MEC13.3 was purchased
from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA), and monoclonal antibody (mAb 62)
against human anti-PECAM was provided by Dr. Marian Nakada (Centoor;
Malvern, PA). Whole molecule rat IgG was from Rockland Immunochemicals
(Gilbertsville, PA).
Preparation of Pluronic F-127 Biotin
The biotinylation
of the triblock copolymerPluronic F-127 took place in several steps
(Scheme 1 in the Supporting Information). First, Pluronic F-127 in CHCl3 was reacted with a large
excess of tosyl chloride (TsCl) in the presence of triethylamine in
an atmosphere of argon at room temperature. The tosylated polymer
was coarsely purified from triethylamine hydrochloride via filtration
of toluene solution, and from the excess of TsCl using several precipitations
with hexane. The resulting tosylated polymer was reacted with potassium
salt of phthalimide in DMF solution at 80–90 °C for 3
h. The phthalimide-modified polymer was coarsely separated from nonpolymeric
impurities by dissolution in toluene and filtration through a pad
of microgranular cellulose. The polymer was purified on a column with
silica gel (eluent CHCl3/MeOH, 1:0 to 1:0.5). Complete
modification of the terminal hydroxyl groups was verified by 1H NMR. The modified polymer was then cleaved using a standard
procedure (reflux for 2 h with hydrazine hydrate in EtOH followed
by removal of the excess hydrazine in vacuum and acidification with
HCl). The amino-terminated Pluronic F-127 was dissolved in CH2Cl2, freed from insoluble impurities by filtration
through microgranular cellulose, and finally purified on a column
with silica gel (eluent CHCl3/MeOH, 30:1 to 1:0.5). The
hydrochloride form of the polymer was transformed into the free base
by treatment with a large excess of Na2CO3 in
water/MeOH/i-PrOH. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) of the amino-terminated Pluronic F-127 exhibited NH2-bound CH2 at δ 2.83 and no signals of uncleaved
phthalimide residues. The amino-terminated Pluronic F-127 was reacted
with biotin N-succinimidyl ester as shown in the
final step of Scheme 1 in the Supporting Information.
Preparation of Pluronic F-127 Maleimide
Pluronic F-127
in CH2Cl2 was reacted with 6-maleimidohexanoic
acid and DCC for 3.5 h at room temperature in the presence of BHT,
which was added to prevent polymerization. After filtering off the
precipitate of 1,3-dicyclohexylurea, the crude polymer was precipitated
with hexane (removing the excess of DCC) and purified by flash chromatography
(silica gel, CHCl3–methanol, 100:0 to 4:1) (Scheme
2 in the Supporting Information). 1H NMR of the modified polymer (400 MHz, CDCl3)
detected the signal of maleimide protons at δ 6.67 ppm, whereas
the signal of terminal CH2OH at δ
2.78 ppm disappeared, indicating the completeness of derivatization.
Cell Culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells
(HUVECs) were purchased at first passage from Lonza Walkersville (Walkersville,
MD) and grown in Falcon tissue culture flasks (BD Biosciences, San
Jose, CA) coated with 1% gelatin (Becton, Dickinson and Company; Sparks,
MD). EGM-BulletKit medium (Lonza Walkersville) containing 10% v/v
fetal bovine serum (FBS) was used. All studies were performed with
passage 5 cells in a confluent state (5 × 104 cells/cm2).
NP Preparation
All solutions were
prepared in Tris
buffer (50 mM). Fifty microliters of 10% TPNa and surfactant (10%
and PF127 unless stated otherwise) were mixed. MnTMPyP (50 μL
of the appropriate concentration) was then added dropwise to that
solution with stirring. To enable antibody conjugation, 5 μL
of the 10% PF127 solution could be substituted with either 10% PF127-biotin
or 10% PF127-maleimide. Purification of the formed particles was performed
using a Sepharose CL-4B gel filtration column (Sigma-Aldrich). If
necessary, samples were reconcentrated by ultrafiltration (10k MWCO,
Amicon centrifugal filter units, EMD Millipore) in the presence of
5% sucrose.
Antibody-SATA (Ab-SATA) Modification
Antibodies were
modified with SATA in a manner similar to that previously described.[13] Briefly, SATA was added to the Ab in a 10-fold
molar excess for 30 min at room temperature in order to introduce
∼1 sulfhydryl group per Ab. N-Hydroxylamine
(0.5 M) was then added at a 1:10 volume ratio for 2 h in order to
deprotect acetylated sulfhydryls. Zeba desalting columns (Thermo Scientific
Pierce) were used to remove unreacted components at each step of the
process.
Antibody-SA (Ab-SA) Conjugate Preparation
Ab was modified
with SATA as described above, but using a 6:1 molar ratio SATA:Ab.
In a parallel reaction, stable maleimide groups were introduced onto
SA using a 20-fold molar excess of SMCC at room temperature for 1
h. Again, products were passed through desalting columns for the removal
of unreacted components. Streptavidination of the Ab was achieved
using a 2:1 molar ratio Ab:SA in a 1 h reaction on ice.
Surface Coating
of NPs with Modified Antibodies
NPs
prepared with PF127-maleimide and PF127-biotin were coated with Ab-SATA
and Ab-SA, respectively. NPs and modified antibodies were mixed for
5 min at room temperature (longer times did not show enhanced antibody
conjugation, unpublished data). As mentioned above, a Sepharose CL-4B
gel filtration column was used for removal of free drug and antibody.
Binding efficiency was measured by radiotracing a 10% substitution
of 125I-IgG-SATA or 125I-IgG-SA. A t test (two-tail, homoscedastic) was used to compare conjugation chemistries;
a p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Antibody radiolabeling was performed using iodination beads as
instructed by the manufacturer (Pierce Iodination Beads, Thermo Scientific,
Pittsburgh, PA). The extent of radiolabeling was measured using a
standard trichloroacetic acid (TCA) assay. Two microliters of labeled
antibody, 1 mL of 3% BSA, and 200 μL of TCA were mixed and incubated
at room temperature for 15 min. Following centrifugation (15 min,
4 °C, 2300g), the amount of free iodine in the
supernatant was quantified using a Wizard2 2470 gamma counter
(PerkinElmer; Waltham, MA).
Analytical Methods
Size and polydispersity
index (PDI)
were measured by dynamic light scattering using a 90Plus Particle
Size Analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments, Holtsville, NY) following a
10-fold dilution in deionized (DI) H2O. UV measurements
were performed on a Varian Cary 50 Bio UV–visible spectrophotometer
(Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). MnTMPyP concentration was
calculated based on a standard curve obtained at 460 nm from 1 to
20 μM in DI H2O. Incorporation efficiency was calculated
as incorporated drug/added drug × 100. Measurements were obtained
for initial NP preparations, purified NPs, and free material to confirm
∼100% drug recovery. Particle breakdown was achieved using
a 1:2 dilution with 0.5 M EDTA prior to dilution with DI H2O.TPNa concentration was assessed using a Waters HPLC system
equipped with a Nova-Pak C18 (3.9 × 150 mm, 4 μm) column.
The mobile phase was 95% MeOH/5% H2O run at 0.5 mL/min.
Concentration was calculated based on a standard curve obtained at
290 nm from 10 to 1000 μg/mL. Encapsulation efficiency was calculated
as described above. NP samples were treated with EDTA (to disrupt
particle structure) and NaCl (to convert tocopherol phosphate back
to sodium salt form) in a concentration-dependent manner prior to
dilution with MeOH.The SOD-like activity of MnTMPyP was determined
using a cytochrome
C reduction assay in which xanthine and xanthine oxidase are combined
to produce superoxide anion and cytochrome C acts as an indicating
scavenger that competes with the mimetic. The working solution (0.6
mL) contained 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA, 20 μM
cytochrome C, and 50 μM xanthine. Reaction was initiated by
the addition of 10 μL of 0.2 U/mL xanthine oxidase, and the
absorbance was monitored at 550 nm. A one-way ANOVA was performed
to provide comparison among free MnTMPyP, intact particles, and EDTA-disrupted
particles. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Drug Release and Stability
Purified
IgG-coated NPs
substituted with 10% 125I-IgG (1.5 mL) were loaded to 10
kDa MWCO Slide-a-lyzer dialysis cassettes (0.5–3 mL, Thermo
Scientific) and dialyzed against either 200 mL of PBS or phosphate
buffer (PB, 10 mM, pH 7.4) at 37 °C. At each time point, 200
μL was removed from inside the cassette for measurement of size
and remaining MnTMPyP. To correct for any dilution, the 125I-IgG activity of a 10 μL aliquot was also measured at each
time point and compared to the initial starting activity.
Binding of
NPs to Endothelial Cells
Antibodies were
conjugated using biotin–streptavidin chemistry and comparisons
were made between targeted anti-PECAM and control IgG coated NPs.
Cold antibodies were doped with 10% 125I-IgG-SA for radiotracing.
Use of this doping technique allows quantitative measurement of binding
to cells while minimizing the chance of false positive results, such
as might occur due to binding of detached Ab-SA if it was labeled
directly. Cells were incubated with increasing quantities of NPs for
30 min at 37 °C. After the incubation, medium was removed, and
the cells were lysed using 1% Triton X100 in 1 N NaOH. The radioactivity
of both supernatants and cell lysates was measured. Particle number
bound per cell calculations were derived on the basis of a NP concentration
of 1 × 1013 particles/mL and an EC density of 105 cells/well on a 24 well plate.
Inflammatory Marker Expression
by Quantitative PCR
HUVECs in 24 well plates were used at
confluency (∼105 cells/well). Anti-PECAM or IgG-coated
NPs were added in fresh
medium; control wells received medium alone. Following a 30 min incubation,
medium was removed, and TNF (10 ng/mL in medium) was added. Medium
was replaced in control wells. After 2.5 h of TNF exposure, medium
was removed and cells were lysed in 350 μL of buffer RLT. Total
cellular RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia,
CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was
synthesized using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit,
and qPCR was performed using Fast SYBR Green Master Mix and a ViiA
7 system (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Gene specific primers
for humanVCAM-1, E-selectin, and IL-8 were utilized as well as validated
Quantitect primers for 18S rRNA and GAPDH (Qiagen).[28] Relative gene expression was quantified using the comparative
CT method, using 18S rRNA and GAPDH as internal controls.[29] Comparisons were made by t test
(two-tail, homoscedastic), and results were considered statistically
significant at p = 0.05.
VCAM Expression by Western
Blot
The study was performed
as described above for PCR but with a 5 h TNF exposure. Cells were
lysed in 100 μL of sample buffer for sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Samples were incubated at 100
°C for 5 min and then stored at 4 °C until use. Cell proteins
were run on a 4–15% gradient gel (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules,
CA) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA)
for Western blotting. The membrane was subsequently blocked for 1
h with 3% nonfat dry milk in TBS-T (100 mM Tris, pH 7.6; 150 mM NaCl;
and 0.1% Tween 20), followed by incubations with primary and secondary
antibodies for VCAM and actin. The blot was detected using ECL Plus
reagents (GE Healthcare, New York, NY). Quantification of blots was
performed using standard densitometry methods (Biorad Fluor-SM, Biorad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Comparisons were made by t test (two-tail, homoscedastic), and results were considered statistically
significant at p = 0.05.
Results
Effect of MnTMPyP
on Size and Drug Loading
Dual bioactive
NPs (PDI < 0.3) could be formed through mixing the soluble tocopherol
phosphatesodium salt and MnTMPyP in the presence of a surfactant.
As the concentration of MnTMPyP was increased, the incorporation of
both components into particles increased (Figure 2A,B). The increase was linear in both cases and similar numerically.
As an example, with a concentration of 50 mg/mL MnTMPyP, corresponding
to the MnTMPyP:TP molar ratio of 1:5, the loading for both drugs was
around 40%. With a +5 charge for the MnTMPyP and a −2 charge
for the TP (when both are in their free form), the 1:5 ratio observed
indicates that displacement of the respective counterions was likely
incomplete.
Figure 2
Effect of added MnTMPyP on NP incorporation of MnTMPyP (A), incorporation
of TP (B), and size (C) (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Effect of added MnTMPyP on NP incorporation of MnTMPyP (A), incorporation
of TP (B), and size (C) (mean ± SD, n = 3).In contrast to the increase in
drug loading, the size of the particles
decreased as additional MnTMPyP was added (Figure 2C). This decrease appeared linear up to a MnTMPyP concentration
of 37.5 mg/mL. Beyond a MnTMPyP concentration of 50 mg/mL, the formation
of large aggregates was observed, and thus, higher drug concentrations
were not pursued. Based on this data, a concentration of 50 mg/mL
was chosen as the standard for further studies.
Effect of Surfactant
Type and Concentration on Drug Loading
Changing the PF127
concentration had an insignificant effect on
drug loading (Figure 3A,B). At a 50 mg/mL concentration,
loading of both MnTMPyP and TP remained around 40% independent of
whether 5, 10, or 20% PF127 was used in the starting preparation.
There was a slight decrease in size on going from 5% to 10% PF127
but no further drop on increasing to 20% PF127 (Figure 3C).
Figure 3
Effect of surfactant concentration on MnTMPyP incorporation (A),
TP incorporation (B), and size (C) (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Effect of surfactant concentration on MnTMPyP incorporation (A),
TP incorporation (B), and size (C) (mean ± SD, n = 3).Interestingly, when 10% TPGS was
used as a surfactant in lieu of
10% PF127, there was a large drop in incorporation efficiency of both
MnTMPyP (from 40% to 15%) and TP (from 40% to 20%) (Figure 3A,B). Size, however, remained similar (Figure 3C).
SOD Activity
The SOD-like activity
of MnTMPyP, as measured
by inhibition of cytochrome C reduction by superoxide, was measured
in its free form, in the intact particles, and in disrupted particles
(Figure 4). When diluted to the same concentration,
there was no significant difference among the three samples (p = 0.361 by one-way ANOVA).
Figure 4
SOD-like activity of
MnTMPyP (as measured by inhibition of cytochrome
C reduction) when measured in its free form, in the intact particles
(diluted in Tris buffer), or in EDTA-disrupted particles. There was
no significant difference among the three samples (p = 0.361) (mean ± SD, n = 3).
SOD-like activity of
MnTMPyP (as measured by inhibition of cytochrome
C reduction) when measured in its free form, in the intact particles
(diluted in Tris buffer), or in EDTA-disrupted particles. There was
no significant difference among the three samples (p = 0.361) (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Antibody Binding
Similar to drug
encapsulation efficiency,
the percentage of binding of antibodies to the NPs was shown to increase
linearly with increasing MnTMPyP concentration (Figure 5). At the highest drug concentration, and hence maximum binding,
a surface coating of ∼120 Abs/NP could be achieved when aiming
for 200 Abs/NP. This was independent of the binding chemistry used:
both biotin–streptavidin and SATA/SMCC conjugation techniques
resulted in similar Ab surface coverage (Figure 5). A t test revealed no significant difference between
the two samples (p = 0.258). NP size increased slightly
(∼20 nm) with Ab binding, while PDI values remained similar
(data not shown).
Figure 5
Effect of added MnTMPyP on antibody binding to NPs. (inset)
Comparison
of antibody binding chemistries on total antibodies bound per NP.
There was no significant difference in binding between the two chemistries
(p = 0.258) (mean ± SD, n =
3).
Effect of added MnTMPyP on antibody binding to NPs. (inset)
Comparison
of antibody binding chemistries on total antibodies bound per NP.
There was no significant difference in binding between the two chemistries
(p = 0.258) (mean ± SD, n =
3).NPs were evaluated for release
of MnTMPyP and change in size during incubation at 37 °C. As
these particles are based highly on electrostatic interactions, comparisons
were made between samples incubated in PBS versus those in a phosphate
buffered solution alone. Drug release was accelerated in PBS as compared
to phosphate buffer (PB), reaching ∼60% released at 24 h versus
only 20% in PB alone (Figure 6A). There was
a statistically significant difference in drug release at all time
points following the initial one. However, the overall rate of drug
release was still relatively slow. In contrast, the size of NPs remained
constant throughout the entire time period and did not vary with the
choice of diluent (Figure 6B). In agreement
with drug dissociation observed in the absence of changes in the size
of remaining particles, the number of particles was progressively
decreasing as could be determined based on the counts reported in
the course of DLS measurements (data not shown).
Figure 6
Drug release (A) and
size stability (B) of NPs incubated at 37
°C (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Drug release (A) and
size stability (B) of NPs incubated at 37
°C (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Cell Binding and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Targeted NPs
HUVECs were used for characterizing the targeting ability of NPs.
Targeted but not control IgG-coated NPs bound to the endothelial cells
in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 7A). At
the maximal dose, delivery of approximately 7,500 NPs per cell could
be achieved within the first 30 min of exposure.
Figure 7
(A) HUVEC binding of
PECAM targeted NPs versus control IgG NPs
following a 30 min incubation. (B) Protection against proinflammatory
endothelial activation as assessed by VCAM, E-selectin, and IL-8 RNA
gene expression. (C) Protection against proinflammatory endothelial
activation as assessed by upregulated VCAM protein levels (mean ±
SD, n = 3, significance p < 0.05).
(A) HUVEC binding of
PECAM targeted NPs versus control IgG NPs
following a 30 min incubation. (B) Protection against proinflammatory
endothelial activation as assessed by VCAM, E-selectin, and IL-8 RNA
gene expression. (C) Protection against proinflammatory endothelial
activation as assessed by upregulated VCAM protein levels (mean ±
SD, n = 3, significance p < 0.05).The enhanced targeting ability
corresponded to an improved functional
effect in this experimental model. Anti-PECAM NPs protected against
the proinflammatory endothelial activation manifested by a variety
of inflammatory markers (VCAM, E-selectin, and IL-8) as determined
by PCR (Figure 7B). By t test,
there was a statistically significant improvement of anti-inflammatory
effect of targeted anti-PECAM vs control IgG coated NPs for E-selectin
(p = 0.029) and IL-8 (p = 0.017)
and a clear trend for VCAM (but not statistically significant, p = 0.057). The difference in effect between targeted and
untargeted NPs was more pronounced with E-selectin and IL-8 through
the whole dose range of NPs evaluated (Figure 1 in the Supporting Information).Based on the significant
augmentation of the protective effect
of targeted vs nontargeted NP observed with VCAM transcription, an
additional study was performed to evaluate this on the level of VCAM
protein expression. Anti-PECAM NPs resulted in nearly 60% protection
against the stimulation of VCAM synthesis (Figure 7C, Figure 2 in the Supporting Information). This was numerically similar to the protection observed on the
RNA level (51%) and a marked improvement (p = 0.005)
over the ∼30% protection provided with control IgG NPs.
Discussion
This paper reports on the development of a novel dual bioactive
NP formulation for targeted delivery of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory
cargoes. Taking advantage of the interactions between TP and MnTMPyP,
the NPs are formed spontaneously via a controlled precipitation mechanism
in the presence of a surfactant, such as PF127. The ion-pairing mechanism
of NP formation using water-soluble precursor compounds obviates the
need for organic solvents or external energy that could potentially
affect the stability of the pharmacophores. Further, since the two
active compounds serve as the NP matrix material, a high drug payload
enables the use of a lower formulation therapeutic dose.There
was a clear correlation between the amount of MnTMPyP added
and the amounts of MnTMPyP and TP incorporated into particles. The
incorporation of the additional particle-forming ion-pair complex
was not accompanied by an increase in the particle size. In fact,
the effective diameter of the resultant NP was shown to decrease with
higher MnTMPyP formulation amounts, up to a certain concentration.
This was likely due to the increasing engagement of TP, initially
present in a large excess, in the formation of the ion-pair complex,
thus reducing the net surface charge coming from unneutralized phosphate
groups and allowing for more effective binding of the hydrophobic
block of the nonionic PF-127.Considering that the percent drug
added is roughly equivalent for
the two compounds, and the amount of TP added is ∼5 times that
of MnTMPyP on a molar basis, we can presume that 5 molecules of TP
are associated with each MnTMPyP molecule. With a +5 charge for the
MnTMPyP and a −2 charge for the TP (when both are in their
free form), this is not the ratio that would be expected for the ion-pair
complex formed with complete mutual displacement of the respective
counterions. However, based on steric effects, it may be impossible
for each TP molecule to associate with multiple sites on a given MnTMPyP
molecule or even on neighboring MnTMPyP molecules. It is noteworthy
that this complex stoichiometry appears to be particularly stable,
as suggested by the similar MnTMPyP:TP ratios observed for all studied
MnTMPyP formulation amounts (compare Figures 2A and 2B).The results observed in studies
considering the effect of surfactant
on size and drug loading were somewhat surprising. Increasing or decreasing
the PF127 concentration in the range of 5–20% had little effect
on size or drug loading. This implies that the particle structure
is primarily based on the structure of the core material with the
PF127 there to provide surface stabilization and a means of adding
targeting agents. Switching to TPGS, which would be expected to align
better with the TP, resulted in a significant decrease in drug incorporation.
Evidently, instead of improving stabilization, it impaired association
of the TP and MnTMPγP.Having chosen a preferred formulation
(50 mg/mL MnTMPyP, 10% PF127),
further studies were performed to characterize the NPs. The SOD-like
activity of MnTMPyP was similar in intact and EDTA-disrupted NPs.
Considering that superoxide is charged and does not pass easily through
lipid membranes, the maintained activity in intact NPs indicates that
MnTMPyP may be oriented toward the surface of the NPs in order to
remain accessible. Alternatively, in contrast to nonionic lipids,
the polar ion-pair complex may provide sufficient diffusivity for
superoxide to access the porphyrins in the particle core, especially
considering the slight linearly changing dimensions of the particles.Binding of antibodies to the NPs was also found to increase linearly
with the amount of MnTMPyP added. This would agree with the idea that,
as additional MnTMPyP is added, the overall number of particles increases.
Overall, it appears that ∼120 Abs can be added per particle
when aiming for 200. Although not surprising that the two conjugation
chemistries (SA–biotin and SATA–maleimide) produced
similar results, this is an important confirmation. While SA–biotin
is known to be a high affinity linkage, it may have limited clinical
applicability due to the potential immunogenicity of streptavidin.Drug release and size stability were evaluated at 37 °C in
one of two diluents: PB or PBS. Although a nonsalinized solution is
not physiologically relevant, it was valuable to see what contribution
this was making to drug release. NaCl may break up the electrostatic
interactions present in the NPs, leading to particle breakdown. As
particle formation is dependent on interaction of TP and MnTMPyP,
it was presumed that release of TP would mirror that of MnTMPyP and
so only that was monitored. Drug release was quite slow in PB alone,
reaching only 80% remaining at 24 h. However, although accelerated
with the addition of saline, drug release was still quite slow with
virtually no initial burst release. In fact, this release profile
may be better suited for the treatment of acute conditions that need
rapid therapy. The maintenance of size throughout the study period
indicates that particles do not gradually erode but instead degrade
entirely, reducing the overall number of NPs and releasing drug in
that manner.The enhanced targeting of anti-PECAM coated NPs
boosted the protective
potency. Targeted NPs exhibited nearly 4-fold enhanced binding over
control IgG NPs. Protection against upregulation of inflammatory markers
was also observed on both the RNA and protein levels. Future studies
should evaluate the effect of these NPs in vivo as well as seek to
elucidate the role of the drug combination in achieving a therapeutic
effect.This study is a valuable addition to the literature
studying this
novel NP formulation based on spontaneous coprecipitation of oppositely
charged water-soluble precursor compounds and employing extremely
mild, aqueous conditions. Previously, this method was used for incorporation
and guided delivery of chemically labile biotherapeutics, including
antioxidant enzymes[30] and gene vectors.[31] In the present study, this approach was successfully
adapted and applied for encapsulation and targeting of small molecule
agents. Notably, the metal porphyrin compound, which is susceptible
to inactivation,[32,33] provides an example of a pharmacophore
whose stability and functionality can be effectively preserved using
this solventless, spontaneous formulation strategy as demonstrated
here.The noncovalent drug complex design of this formulation
is also
noteworthy as it offers considerable flexibility and does not require
chemical modification of the pharmacophores yet also provides the
mutual change in the organo-/hydrophilicity required for configuring
their complex in colloidally stable nanocarriers. The PEGylated surface
of these particles coated with PF-127, in addition to being essential
for “stealth” properties, is also amenable for attachment
of affinity ligands, thus greatly extending the range of potential
clinical applications.Importantly, while this design is not
readily applicable to any
pair of pharmacologically complementary pharmacophores, it can potentially
provide a convenient and effective strategy for nanoencapsulation
and targeted delivery of a large number of amphiphilic and hydrophobic
agents, either as part of the ion-pair complex or through physical
entrapment in the particle core. It would be interesting to evaluate
what requirements are necessary for formation of NPs—for example,
a basal colloidal structure as might be expected with TP—and,
therefore, how far this technology could be expanded. One possible
limitation in using bioactive compounds as the NP matrix material
is an inability to control the drug ratio to the same extent as could
be done when the compounds are simply being loaded. However, this
may be outweighed by the potential advantages, such as capacity for
a high therapeutic payload, slow drug release, or reduced toxicity.
Conclusions
Based on the role of oxidative stress in inflammation, a novel
antioxidant/anti-inflammatory NP was designed. Capitalizing on the
interactions of TP and MnTMPyP, NPs could be formed with only the
addition of surfactant. The size, drug incorporation efficiency, and
antibody surface coating were shown to be dependent on the amount
of MnTMPyP added as well as the choice of surfactant. MnTMPyP was
shown to retain its SOD-like activity while in intact particles and
to release in a slow and controlled manner. Preliminary in vitro studies
confirmed enhanced targeting and reduced VCAM upregulation of the
anti-PECAM NPs over control IgG NPs.
Authors: Bi-Sen Ding; Claudia Gottstein; Andrea Grunow; Alice Kuo; Kumkum Ganguly; Steven M Albelda; Douglas B Cines; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: Blood Date: 2005-09-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: V R Muzykantov; M Christofidou-Solomidou; I Balyasnikova; D W Harshaw; L Schultz; A B Fisher; S M Albelda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Silvia Muro; Rainer Wiewrodt; Anu Thomas; Lauren Koniaris; Steven M Albelda; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Michael Koval Journal: J Cell Sci Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Ann-Marie Chacko; Jingyan Han; Colin F Greineder; Blaine J Zern; John L Mikitsh; Madhura Nayak; Divya Menon; Ian H Johnston; Mortimer Poncz; David M Eckmann; Peter F Davies; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Oscar A Marcos-Contreras; Colin F Greineder; Raisa Yu Kiseleva; Hamideh Parhiz; Landis R Walsh; Viviana Zuluaga-Ramirez; Jacob W Myerson; Elizabeth D Hood; Carlos H Villa; Istvan Tombacz; Norbert Pardi; Alecia Seliga; Barbara L Mui; Ying K Tam; Patrick M Glassman; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Jia Nong; Jacob S Brenner; Makan Khoshnejad; Tom Madden; Drew Weissmann; Yuri Persidsky; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dina V Hingorani; Fanny Chapelin; Emma Stares; Stephen R Adams; Hideho Okada; Eric T Ahrens Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Makan Khoshnejad; Hamideh Parhiz; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Ivan J Dmochowski; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Oscar A Marcos-Contreras; Jacob S Brenner; Raisa Y Kiseleva; Viviana Zuluaga-Ramirez; Colin F Greineder; Carlos H Villa; Elizabeth D Hood; Jacob W Myerson; Silvia Muro; Yuri Persidsky; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: J Control Release Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Andreas Daiber; Sebastian Steven; Alina Weber; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Ismail Laher; Huige Li; Santiago Lamas; Thomas Münzel Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Prachi Gupta; Brendan L Thompson; Banrida Wahlang; Carolyn T Jordan; J Zach Hilt; Bernhard Hennig; Thomas Dziubla Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.617
Authors: Hamideh Parhiz; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Norbert Pardi; Makan Khoshnejad; Raisa Yu Kiseleva; Jacob S Brenner; Thomas Uhler; Steven Tuyishime; Barbara L Mui; Ying K Tam; Thomas D Madden; Michael J Hope; Drew Weissman; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 9.776