| Literature DB >> 24877153 |
Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin Asad1, Ghulam Murtaza1, Muhammad Ubaid1, Ashif Sajjad2, Rubada Mehmood3, Qaisar Mahmood4, Muhammad Muzzmil Ansari5, Sabiha Karim6, Zahid Mehmood2, Izhar Hussain1.
Abstract
Naja naja karachiensis envenomation was found to hit more drastically heart, liver, and kidneys. 400 μg/kg of venom-raised moderate serum levels of ALT (72 ± 4.70 U/L, 0.1 > P > 0.05), AST (157 ± 24.24 U/L, 0.1 > P > 0.05), urea (42 ± 3.08 mg/dL, 0.05 > P > 0.02), creatinine (1.74 ± 0.03 mg/dL, 0.01 > P > 0.001), CK-MB (21 ± 1.5 U/L, 0.05 > P > 0.02), and LDH (2064 ± 15.98 U/L, P < 0.001) were injected in experimental rabbits. However, lethality was enhanced with 800 μg/kg of venom in terms of significant release of ALT (86 ± 5.0 U/L, 0.05 > P > 0.02), AST (251 ± 18.2 U/L, 0.01 > P > 0.001), urea (57.6 ± 3.84 mg/dL, 0.02 > P > 0.01), creatinine (2.1 ± 0.10 mg/dL, 0.02 > P > 0.01), CK-MB (77 ± 11.22 U/L, 0.05 > P > 0.02), and LDH (2562 ± 25.14 U/L, P ≪ 0.001). Among twenty-eight tested medicinal plant extracts, only Stenolobium stans (L.) Seem was found the best antivenom (P > 0.5) compared to the efficacy of standard antidote (ALT = 52.5 ± 3.51 U/L, AST = 69.5 ± 18.55 U/L, urea = 31.5 ± 0.50 mg/dL, creatinine = 1.08 ± 0.02 mg/dL, CK-MB = 09 ± 0.85 U/L, and LDH = 763 ± 6.01 U/L). Other plant extracts were proved less beneficial and partly neutralized the toxicities posed by cobra venom. However, it is essential in future to isolate and characterize bioactive compound(s) from Stenolobium stans (L.) Seem extract to overcome the complications of snake bite.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24877153 PMCID: PMC4022246 DOI: 10.1155/2014/970540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Detailed description for evaluated medicinal plants having folklore evidences as antivenom.
| Sr. number | Botanical name of medicinal plants | Family | Part used | Phytochemicals reported | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Fabaceae | Seed | Carbohydrates, proteins, alkaloids, flavanoids, tannins, echinocystic acid, and different amino acids. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 2 |
| Amaryllidaceae | Bulb | 11 g carbohydrates, 1.2 g proteins, 0.6 g fibers, and H2O content (86.8 g)/100 g of material. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 3 |
| Amaryllidaceae | Bulb | Quercetin, scordinines A and B allicin, thiosulfinates, 2 mercapto-L-cysteines, anthocyanins, alliinase, polysaccharides, sativin I and sativin II, and glycosides of kaempferol. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 4 |
| Malvaceae | Root | 37% starch, 11% mucilage, fatty oil, pectin, flavonoids, phenolic acids, asparagines, phytosterol, sucrose, and butyric acid. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 5 |
| Fabaceae | Root | Tannins, fatty oil, lupeol, kaempferol-3-glucoside, gums, | [ |
|
| |||||
| 6 |
| Brassicaceae | Seed | Essential oil, sinigrin and glucoside. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 7 |
| Apocynaceae | Exudates and flower | Resins, tannins, calotropin, sterol, uscharin, calotropagenin, calotoxin, and calactin. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 8 |
| Pinaceae | Bark | Taxifolin, dewardiol, dewarene, gum, ascorbic acid, himadarol, cantdarol, cholesterin, allohimachalol, cedrinoside, himachalol, dewarol, cedrin, dihydrodehydrodiconiferyl alcohol, essential oil, isocentdarol, and dihydromyricetin. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 9 |
| Rutaceae | Fruit | 4- | [ |
|
| |||||
| 10 |
| Cucurbitaceae | Fruit | Many alkaloids, glycosides, tannins, citrulluin, citrulluic acid, dihydric alcohol, phydroxybenzyl, citrulluene, hentriacontane, elaterin, citrullol, methyl ether, bitter oil, citbittol, and saponins. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 11 |
| Apiaceae | Seed | Essential oil and cumin oil contain sminaldehyde, 1,3-p-menthadien-7-al, and 1,4-p-menthadien-7-al. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 12 |
| Gentianaceae | Whole plant | Saponarin, isovetexin, sylyswertin, betulin, swertiamarin, apigenin, genkwanin, erythrocentaurine, swertioside, isoswertisin, enicoflavine, and swertisin. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 13 |
| Zygophyllaceae | Leaves | Ursolic acid, pinitol, nahagenin, saponin glycosides, saponin-I and saponin-II, docosyl docosanoate from n-hexane extract, and different proteins from aqueous extract. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 14 |
| Lamiaceae | Whole plant | Alkaloid as well as essential oil. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 15 |
| Brassicaceae | Seeds | Oil rich in chlorophylls a, b, N, P, K, and Na, | [ |
|
| |||||
| 16 |
| Cucurbitaceae | Fruit | Carotenoids, momorcharasides A and B, glucosides, stigmastadien-3-beta-ol, squalene, mycoses, steroidal glucoside, momordicines I and II, stigmasterol, vicine, cucurbitane triterpenoids, momordicosides, cycloeucalenol, taraxerol, spinasterollophenol, diosgenin, thiocyanogen, 24-methylencycloartenol, and phenyl propanoids. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 17 |
| Apocynaceae | Root and leaves | Nerioderin, neriodorin, karabin, and odorin. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 18 |
| Lamiaceae | Whole plant | Essential oils are found rich in 3.2% carvacrol, 71.3% eugenol, 1.7% caryophyllene, 20.4% methyl eugenol, eugenol methyl ether, linalool, and methyl chavicol cineole. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 19 |
| Pinaceae | Oleoresin | Careen, | [ |
|
| |||||
| 20 |
| Anacardiaceae | Galls | 1.3% essential oil rich in camphene, cineole, A-terpineol, A-pinene, aromadendrene, caprylic acid, and d-limonene abundant in galls. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 21 |
| Fabaceae | Seeds | Limonene, linalool, psoralene, angelicin, neobavachalcone, bakuchiol, 4-terpineol, corylidin, neobavaisoflavone, bavachinin, isobavachin, | [ |
|
| |||||
| 22 |
| Apocynaceae | Leaves | Enzymes (NADPH dependent), glycosides (roblnin, 3-7-rhamnoside and isorhamnetin-3-7-rhamnoside), alkaloid (sewarine), and triterpenes (ursolic acid, Mg quinate, and | [ |
|
| |||||
| 23 |
| Rubiaceae | Stem | Pseudopurpurin, xanthopurpurin, purpurin, munjistin, alizarin, and munjistin are found with their glycosides. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 24 |
| Sapindaceae | Fruit |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 25 | Stenolobium stans (L.) Seem | Bignoniaceae | Root |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 26 |
| Combretaceae | Bark |
| [ |
|
| |||||
| 27 |
| Boraginaceae | Whole plant | Seeds oil is rich in linoleic, oleic, stearic, palmitic, and linolenic acids. Apart of it hexacosane, ethyl hexacosanoate, and 21,24-hexacos-adienoic acid ethyl esters are found. | [ |
|
| |||||
| 28 |
| Zingiberaceae | Rhizome | D-Curcumene, cineol, potassium oxalate, camphene, citral borneol, singiberine, shogaol, | 23 |
Biochemical parameters before and after snake venom administration in different experimental groups of rabbits.
| Toxicity determined | Markers of snake venom toxicity | Group I baseline | Group II and III venom injection | Group IV negative control (mean ± SEM) | Normal reference values reported | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.4 mg/kg | 0.8 mg/kg | ||||||
| Liver | GPT/ALT | (52 ± 3.46) U/L | (72 ± 4.70) U/L | (86 ± 5.0) U/L | (52 ± 3.48) U/L | (48–80) U/L | [ |
| GOT/AST | (65 ± 6.57) U/L | (157 ± 24.24) U/L | (251 ± 18.2) U/L | (67 ± 3.21) U/L | (14–113) U/L | [ | |
|
| |||||||
| Kidneys | Urea | ( 28 ± 1.73) mg/dL | (42 ± 3.08) mg/dL | (57.6 ± 3.84) mg/dL | (28 ± 0.33) mg/dL | (10–28) mg/dL | [ |
| Creatinine | (1.0 ± 0.313) mg/dL | (1.74 ± 0.03) mg/dL | (2.1 ± 0.10) mg/dL | (1 ± 0.06) mg/dL | (0.5–2.5) mg/dL | [ | |
|
| |||||||
| Heart | CK-MB | (13.2 ± 2.0) U/L | (21 ± 1.5) U/L | (77 ± 11.22) U/L | (13 ± 0.56) U/L | (<25) U/L* | [ |
| LDH | (714 ± 3.18) U/L | (2064 ± 15.98) U/L | (2562 ± 25.14) U/L | (720 ± 4.70) U/L | (559–2077) U/L | [ | |
*CK-MB activity is less than 2% in healthy rabbits; however, it is usually 10%–30% of total CK activity.
Hepatoprotective activity of various medicinal plant extracts on ALT and AST levels to neutralize snake bite envenomation in experimental rabbits.
| Sr. number | Group V | Name of evaluated sample | GPT/ALT | GOT/AST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U/L |
| U/L (mean ± SEM) |
| |||
| 1 | (V/1) |
| 62 ± 7.02 | 0.5 > | 99 ± 18.55 | 0.5 > |
| 2 | (V/2) |
| 68 ± 12.03 | 0.5 > | 166.5 ± 0.50 | 0.5 > |
| 3 | (V/3) |
| 49 ± 5.01 |
| 82.5 ± 18.55 |
|
| 4 | (V/4) |
| 70 ± 20.05 |
| 74.5 ± 14.54 |
|
| 5 | (V/5) |
| 78 ± 4.04 | 0.5 > | 149.5 ± 19.9 | 0.5 > |
| 6 | (V/6) |
| 45 ± 0.00 | 0.5 > | 55 ± 1.00 |
|
| 7 | (V/7a) |
| 31.5 ± 0.5 | 0.5 > | 141 ± 1.01 | 0.5 > |
| 8 | (V/7b) |
| 62.5 ± 2.52 | 0.5 > | 194 ± 12.12 | 0.5 > |
| 9 | (V/8) |
| 63.3 ± 4.14 | 0.5 > | 72 ± 2.02 |
|
| 10 | (V/9) |
| 30.5 ± 13.63 | 0.5 > | 49 ± 24.24 |
|
| 11 | (V/10) |
| 47.5 ± 5.55 |
| 74 ± 9.09 |
|
| 12 | (V/11) |
| 67 ± 16.16 |
| 157 ± 14.14 | 0.5 > |
| 13 | (V/12) |
| 85.25 ± 1.26 | 0.1 > | 168.5 ± 7.57 | 0.5 > |
| 14 | (V/13) |
| 80 ± 7.82 | 0.5 > | 170 ± 13.13 | 0.5 > |
| 15 | (V/14) |
| 45.5 ± 7.52 |
| 53.5 ± 0.50 |
|
| 16 | (V/15) |
| 62 ± 8.08 | 0.5 > | 121 ± 5.05 | 0.5 > |
| 17 | (V/16) |
| 62.5 ± 7.52 | 0.5 > | 247 ± 46.13 | 0.5 > |
| 18 | (V/17) |
| 88 ± 19.55 | 0.5 > | 235 ± 18.05 | 0.1 > |
| 19 | (V/18) |
| 61.5 ± 7.52 | 0.5 > | 158 ± 10.02 | 0.5 > |
| 20 | (V/19) |
| 53 ± 9.02 |
| 57 ± 13.03 |
|
| 21 | (V/20) |
| 41.5 ± 1.5 | 0.5 > | 54.5 ± 0.50 |
|
| 22 | (V/21) |
| 54 ± 1.00 |
| 66.5 ± 11.53 |
|
| 23 | (V/22) |
| 66 ± 24.24 |
| 132.5 ± 12.62 | 0.5 > |
| 24 | (V/23) |
| 65.5 ± 17.67 |
| 129 ± 66.41 |
|
| 25 | (V/24) |
| 56 ± 6.01 |
| 78.5 ± 13.54 |
|
| 26 | (V/25) |
| 46.5 ± 6.56 |
| 70.5 ± 3.53 |
|
| 27 | (V/26) |
| 47.5 ± 1.51 | 0.5 > | 78 ± 6.06 |
|
| 28 | (V/27) |
| 52 ± 0.00 |
| 125 ± 4.01 | 0.5 > |
| 29 | (V/28) |
| 66.5 ± 32.59 |
| 117.5 ± 9.52 | 0.5 > |
| 30 | (V/29) | Reference standard antidote | 52.5 ± 3.51 | Select to compare | 69.5 ± 18.55 | Select to compare |
Figure 1Comparison of various medicinal plant extracts with reference standard antidote in neutralization of increased GPT and GOT serum level posed by Naja naja karachiensis venom in rabbits.
Nephroprotective activity of different medicinal plant extracts on urea and creatinine levels to neutralize snake bite envenomation in experimental rabbits.
| Sr. number | Group V (subgroup) | Name of evaluated sample | Urea | Creatinine | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/dL |
| mg/dL |
| |||
| 1 | (V/1) |
| 57 ± 0.0 | 0.02 > | 1.6 ± 0.20 | 0.5 > |
| 2 | (V/2) |
| 51 ± 11.03 | 0.5 > | 1.50 ± 0.17 | 0.5 > |
| 3 | (V/3) |
| 50 ± 4.01 | 0.5 > | 1.30 ± 0.06 | 0.5 > |
| 4 | (V/4) |
| 26 ± 5.05 |
| 1.18 ± 0.24 |
|
| 5 | (V/5) |
| 50 ± 12.6 | 0.5 > | 1.36 ± 0.24 | 0.5 > |
| 6 | (V/6) |
| 22.5 ± 4.51 | 0.5 > | 1.07 ± 0.11 |
|
| 7 | (V/7a) |
| 42.5 ± 2.52 | 0.5 > | 1.30 ± 0.01 | 0.1 > |
| 8 | (V/7b) |
| 39 ± 2.02 | 0.5 > | 1.25 ± 0.03 | 0.5 > |
| 9 | (V/8) |
| 44 ± 4.04 | 0.5 > | 1.44 ± 0.07 | 0.5 > |
| 10 | (V/9) |
| 39.5 ± 2.52 | 0.5 > | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 0.1 > |
| 11 | (V/10) |
| 49.5 ± 3.53 | 0.5 > | 1.52 ± 0.15 | 0.5 > |
| 12 | (V/11) |
| 54 ± 1.01 | 0.05 > | 1.48 ± 0.01 | 0.05 > |
| 13 | (V/12) |
| 39.5 ± 4.54 | 0.5 > | 1.35 ± 0.05 | 0.5 > |
| 14 | (V/13) |
| 43 ± 2.27 | 0.5 > | 1.23 ± 0.13 |
|
| 15 | (V/14) |
| 31.5 ± 0.50 |
| 1.07 ± 0.05 |
|
| 16 | (V/15) |
| 43.5 ± 3.53 | 0.5 > | 1.44 ± 0.14 | 0.5 > |
| 17 | (V/16) |
| 57 ± 5.01 | 0.5 > | 1.5 ± 0.005 | 0.05 > |
| 18 | (V/17) |
| 47 ± 0.00 |
| 1.24 ± 0.10 | 0.5 > |
| 19 | (V/18) |
| 49.5 ± 7.52 | 0.5 > | 1.5 ± 0.005 | 0.05 > |
| 20 | (V/19) |
| 45 ± 1.00 |
| 1.4 ± 0.05 | 0.5 > |
| 21 | (V/20) |
| 66.5 ± 0.50 | 0.02 > | 1.68 ± 0.10 | 0.5 > |
| 22 | (V/21) |
| 42.5 ± 2.50 | 0.5 > | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 0.5 > |
| 23 | (V/22) |
| 53.5 ± 3.53 | 0.5 > | 1.67 ± 0.005 | 0.05 > |
| 24 | (V/23) |
| 36 ± 1.01 | 0.5 > | 0.93 ± 0.48 |
|
| 25 | (V/24) |
| 44 ± 1.00 | 0.1 > | 1.43 ± 0.12 | 0.5 > |
| 26 | (V/25) |
| 25.5 ± 6.51 |
| 1.1 ± 0.06 |
|
| 27 | (V/26) |
| 38.5 ± 1.51 | 0.5 > | 1.27 ± 0.23 |
|
| 28 | (V/27) |
| 37 ± 1.00 | 0.5 > | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 0.05 > |
| 29 | (V/28) |
| 47 ± 1.00 | 0.05 > | 1.30 ± 0.01 | 0.5 > |
| 30 | (V/29) | Reference standard antidote | 31.5 ± 0.50 | Select to compare | 1.08 ± 0.02 | Select to compare |
Figure 2Comparison of various medicinal plant extracts with reference standard antivenom in neutralization of elevated serum urea and creatinine level posed by Naja naja karachiensis venom in rabbits.
Cardioprotective activity of medicinal plant extracts on LDH and CK-MB levels to neutralize snake bite envenomation in experimental rabbits.
| Sr. number | Group V (subgroup) | Name of evaluated sample | LDH | CK-MB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U/L (mean ± SEM) |
| U/L (mean ± SEM) |
| |||
| 1 | (V/1) |
| 1357 ± 1.00 | 0.01 > | 4.1 ± 0.85 | 0.5 > |
| 2 | (V/2) |
| 934 ± 13.03 | 0.1 > | 14.8 ± 1.65 |
|
| 3 | (V/3) |
| 1177 ± 20.56 | 0.05 > | 6.6 ± 3.30 | 0.5 > |
| 4 | (V/4) |
| 975.5 ± 33.60 | 0.5 > | 14.8 ± 3.30 |
|
| 5 | (V/5) |
| 1972 ± 3.00 |
| 8.3 ± 6.76 |
|
| 6 | (V/6) |
| 855.5 ± 0.50 | 0.05 > | 9.0 ± 0.85 | 0.5 > |
| 7 | (V/7a) |
| 1022 ± 5.01 | 0.02 > | 6.6 ± 3.30 | 0.5 > |
| 8 | (V/7b) |
| 1114 ± 1.00 | 0.02 > | 61.8 ± 10.9 | 0.5 > |
| 9 | (V/8) |
| 1230 ± 23.57 | 0.05 > | 41.2 ± 31.66 |
|
| 10 | (V/9) |
| 1831 ± 65.69 | 0.05 > | 73 ± 14.1 | 0.5 > |
| 11 | (V/10) |
| 827 ± 6.51 | 0.1 > | 05 ± 1.66 | 0.5 > |
| 12 | (V/11) |
| 1589 ± 22.56 | 0.02 > | 5.8 ± 0.80 | 0.5 > |
| 13 | (V/12) |
| 1615 ± 1.51 |
| 9.85 ± 1.66 | 0.5 > |
| 14 | (V/13) |
| 1418 ± 13.03 | 0.02 > | 11 ± 2.52 |
|
| 15 | (V/14) |
| 783 ± 10.02 | 0.5 > | 14 ± 0.80 |
|
| 16 | (V/15) |
| 1428 ± 6.51 |
| 08 ± 1.66 | 0.5 > |
| 17 | (V/16) |
| 1475.5 ± 3.51 |
| 15.6 ± 2.45 |
|
| 18 | (V/17) |
| 1268 ± 12.03 | 0.02 > | 05 ± 1.65 | 0.5 > |
| 19 | (V/18) |
| 1335 ± 12.03 | 0.02 > | 12.3 ± 2.45 |
|
| 20 | (V/19) |
| 1050 ± 1.00 | 0.02 > | 08 ± 1.65 | 0.5 > |
| 21 | (V/20) |
| 1135.5 ± 0.5 | 0.02 > | 13.1 ± 1.65 | 0.5 > |
| 22 | (V/21) |
| 1153.5 ± 0.5 |
| 17.3 ± 2.50 | 0.5 > |
| 23 | (V/22) |
| 1538 ± 20.05 | 0.02 > | 4.1 ± 0.85 | 0.5 > |
| 24 | (V/23) |
| 1078 ± 16.04 | 0.05 > | 6.6 ± 0.00 | 0.5 > |
| 25 | (V/24) |
| 1460.5 ± 5.51 | 0.01 > | 4.1 ± 0.80 | 0.5 > |
| 26 | (V/25) |
| 787 ± 28.08 |
| 13 ± 1.76 |
|
| 27 | (V/26) |
| 798.5 ± 14.54 | 0.5 > | 6.6 ± 0.00 | 0.5 > |
| 28 | (V/27) |
| 978.5 ± 4.51 | 0.05 > | 6.6 ± 3.00 | 0.5 > |
| 29 | (V/28) |
| 888 ± 2.00 | 0.05 > | 17.3 ± 0.80 | 0.5 > |
| 30 | (V/29) | Reference standard antidote | 763 ± 6.01 | Select to compare | 09 ± 0.85 | Select to compare |
Figure 3Comparison of various medicinal plant extracts with reference standard antisera in neutralization of LDH and CK-MB levels elevated by Naja naja karachiensis venom in rabbits.