Literature DB >> 24876924

Comparison of different magnetic resonance imaging sequences for assessment of fistula-in-ano.

Michael R Torkzad1, Håkan Ahlström1, Urban Karlbom1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess agreement between different forms of T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), and post-contrast T1WI in the depiction of fistula tracts, inflammation, and internal openings with that of a reference test.
METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive prospective cases were enrolled. The following sequences were used for T2WI: 2D turbo-spin-echo (2D T2 TSE); 3D T2 TSE; short tau inversion recovery (STIR); 2D T2 TSE with fat saturation performed in all patients. T1WI were either a 3D T1-weighted prepared gradient echo sequence with fat saturation or a 2D T1 fat saturation [Spectral presaturation with inversion (SPIR)]. Agreement for each sequence for determination of fistula extension, internal openings, and the presence of active inflammation was assessed separately and blindly against a reference test comprised of follow-up, surgery, endoscopic ultrasound, and assessment by an independent experienced radiologist with access to all images.
RESULTS: Fifty-six fistula tracts were found: 2 inter-sphincteric, 13 trans-sphincteric, and 24 with additional tracts. The best T2 weighted sequence for depiction of fistula tracts was 2D T2 TSE (Cohen's kappa = 1.0), followed by 3D T2 TSE (0.88), T2 with fat saturation (0.54), and STIR (0.19). Internal openings were best seen on 2D T2 TSE (Cohen's kappa = 0.88), followed by 3D T2 TSE (0.70), T2 with fat saturation (0.54), and STIR (0.31). Detection of inflammation showed Cohen's kappa of 0.88 with 2D T2 TSE, 0.62 with 3D T2 TSE, 0.63 with STIR, and 0.54 with T2 with fat saturation. STIR, 3D T2 TSE, and T2 with fat saturation did not make any contributions compared to 2D T2 TSE. Post-contrast 3D T1 weighted prepared gradient echo sequence with fat saturation showed better agreement in the depiction of fistulae (Cohen's kappa = 0.94), finding internal openings (Cohen's kappa = 0.97), and evaluating inflammation (Cohen's kappa = 0.94) compared to post-contrast 2D T1 fat saturation or SPIR where the corresponding figures were 0.71, 0.66, and 0.87, respectively. Comparing the best T1 and T2 sequences showed that, for best results, both sequences were necessary.
CONCLUSION: 3D T1 weighted sequences were best for the depiction of internal openings and active inflammatory components, while 2D T2 TSE provided the best assessment of fistula extension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Fistula; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876924      PMCID: PMC4037546          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  25 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal and anal cancer.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Ihab Kamel; Vivek Gowdra Halappa; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Ideal combination of MRI sequences for perianal fistula classification and the evaluation of additional findings for readers with varying levels of experience.

Authors:  Nalan Yildirim; Gökhan Gökalp; Ersin Öztürk; Abdullah Zorluoğlu; Tuncay Yilmazlar; Ilker Ercan; Gürsel Savci
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques.

Authors:  Gokulakkrishna Subhas; Jasneet Singh Bhullar; Ahmed Al-Omari; Amruta Unawane; Vijay K Mittal; Ralph Pearlman
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 4.  Management of anal fistula.

Authors:  Jonathan Alastair Simpson; Ayan Banerjea; John Howard Scholefield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-10-15

Review 5.  Rectal imaging: part 2, Perianal fistula evaluation on pelvic MRI--what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Ryan B O'Malley; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Ravi K Kaza; Ashish P Wasnik; Peter S Liu; Hero K Hussain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: STIR or SPIR?

Authors:  S Halligan; J C Healy; C I Bartram
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Shandra Bipat; Brunella Barbaro; Filipe Caseiro-Alves; Luís Curvo-Semedo; Helen M Fenlon; Marc J Gollub; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Steve Halligan; Christine Hoeffel; Seung Ho Kim; Andrea Laghi; Andrea Maier; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jaap Stoker; Stuart A Taylor; Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard.

Authors:  Gordon N Buchanan; Steve Halligan; Clive I Bartram; Andrew B Williams; Danilo Tarroni; C Richard G Cohen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Update on anal fistulae: surgical perspectives for the gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Helena Tabry; Paul A Farrands
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 10.  Surgical treatment of anorectal crohn disease.

Authors:  Robert T Lewis; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Thyroid Cartilage Invasion in Patients with Laryngohypopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced 2D Spin-Echo and 3D T1-Weighted Radial Gradient Recalled-Echo Techniques.

Authors:  C J Park; J-H Kim; S S Ahn; S-K Lee; Y W Koh; J Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.966

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.