| Literature DB >> 24876488 |
M Hansen1, P Potapov2, B Margono2, S Stehman3, S Turubanova2, A Tyukavina2.
Abstract
Tropek et al. critique the Hansen et al. global forest loss paper in terms of its utility and accuracy. Both criticisms suffer from a miscomprehension of the definition of forest employed as well as the requirements of product validation. Utility of the product is enhanced through its integration with forest type, carbon stock, protected area status, and other ancillary data.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24876488 DOI: 10.1126/science.1248817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728