Literature DB >> 24876448

Accuracy of a novel noninvasive transdermal continuous glucose monitor in critically ill patients.

Nicole M Saur1, Michael R England1, Wayne Menzie2, Ann Marie Melanson1, My-Quyen Trieu2, Jason Berlin2, James Hurley2, Keith Krystyniak2, Gail L Kongable3, Stanley A Nasraway4.   

Abstract

Stress hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the critically ill. Intermittent, random blood glucose (BG) measurements can miss episodes of hyper- and hypoglycemia. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the Symphony® continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Fifteen adult cardiac surgery patients were evaluated immediately postoperatively in the intensive care unit. Prelude® SkinPrep prepared the skin and a sensor was applied to 2 test sites on each subject to monitor interstitial fluid glucose. Reference BG was sampled at 30- to 60-minute intervals. The skin at the test sites was inspected for adverse effects. Accuracy of the retrospectively analyzed CGM data relative to reference BG values was determined using continuous glucose-error grid analysis (CG-EGA) and mean absolute relative difference (MARD). Using 570 Symphony CGM glucose readings paired with reference BG measurements, CG-EGA showed that 99.6% of the readings were within zones A and B. BG measurements ranged from 73 to 251 mg/dL. The MARD was 12.3%. No adverse device effects were reported. The Symphony CGM system is able to safely, continuously, and noninvasively monitor glucose in the transdermal interstitial fluid of cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients with accuracy similar to that reported with other CGM systems. Future versions of the system will need real-time data analysis, fast warm-up, and less frequent calibrations to be used in the clinical setting.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosensor; continuous glucose; diabetes; intensive care; tight glycemic; transdermal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876448      PMCID: PMC4455366          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814536138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  31 in total

Review 1.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 2.  A tale of two compartments: interstitial versus blood glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Eda Cengiz; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Convergence of continuous glucose monitoring and in-hospital tight glycemic control: closing the gap between caregivers and industry.

Authors:  Michaela Miller; Matthew J Skladany; Christopher R Ludwig; Joshua S Guthermann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-11

4.  Clinical evaluation of alternative-site glucose measurements in patients after major cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Martin Ellmerer; Martin Haluzik; Jan Blaha; Jaromir Kremen; Stepan Svacina; Wolfgang Toller; Julia Mader; Lukas Schaupp; Johannes Plank; Thomas Pieber
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Association between hyperglycemia and increased hospital mortality in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients.

Authors:  James Stephen Krinsley
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Tight glycemic control in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients improves perioperative outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events.

Authors:  Harold L Lazar; Stuart R Chipkin; Carmel A Fitzgerald; Yusheng Bao; Howard Cabral; Carl S Apstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Evaluation of a continuous blood glucose monitoring system using a central venous catheter with an integrated microdialysis function.

Authors:  Fanny Schierenbeck; Anders Öwall; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Jan Liska
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mikhail Kosiborod; Rebecca K Gottlieb; Julie A Sekella; Diane Peterman; Anna Grodzinsky; Paul Kennedy; Michael A Borkon
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2014-07-21

10.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Marlene Wewalka; Wolfgang Miehsler; Harald Herkner; Christian Madl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  8 in total

1.  Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients After Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplantation.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Brandon M Nathan; Antoinette Moran; Ty B Dunn; Gregory J Beilman; Timothy L Pruett; Boris P Kovatchev; Melena D Bellin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Rijkenberg; S C van Steen; J H DeVries; P H J van der Voort
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  mHealth For Aging China: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Yutao Guo; Xiaoning Wang; Qiang Zeng
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 6.745

4.  Evaluation of a Novel Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) Monitoring System: Comparison with the AUC by Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Satoshi Ugi; Hiroshi Maegawa; Katsutaro Morino; Yoshihiko Nishio; Toshiyuki Sato; Seiki Okada; Yasuo Kikkawa; Toshihiro Watanabe; Hiromu Nakajima; Atsunori Kashiwagi
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 5.376

Review 5.  The Clinical Benefits and Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sigrid C J van Steen; Saskia Rijkenberg; Jacqueline Limpens; Peter H J van der Voort; Jeroen Hermanides; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Fiber Optic Sensors: A Review for Glucose Measurement.

Authors:  José Luis Cano Perez; Jaime Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Christian Perezcampos Mayoral; Eduardo L Pérez-Campos; Maria Del Socorro Pina Canseco; Lorenzo Tepech Carrillo; Laura Pérez-Campos Mayoral; Marciano Vargas Treviño; Edmundo López Apreza; Roberto Rojas Laguna
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 7.  Products for Monitoring Glucose Levels in the Human Body With Noninvasive Optical, Noninvasive Fluid Sampling, or Minimally Invasive Technologies.

Authors:  Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Andreas Thomas; Mark A Arnold; Beatrice N Vetter; Lutz Heinemann; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-13

8.  Adaptive Boosting Based Personalized Glucose Monitoring System (PGMS) for Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Prediction with Improved Accuracy.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar Anand; Dong Ryeol Shin; Mudasar Latif Memon
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.