Mike Grady1, Mitchel Pineau2, Mary Kate Pynes2, Laurence B Katz3, Barry Ginsberg4. 1. LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK mgrady@its.jnj.com. 2. FACET Technologies Inc, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. LifeScan Inc, Wayne, PA, USA. 4. Diabetes Technology Consultants, Wyckoff, NJ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a perception that patients with diabetes struggle to produce sufficient blood to fill glucose test strips, including strips with 1-µL fill requirements. The purpose of this study was to determine the volume of blood expressed when these patients perform routine fingersticks using their own lancing device and sampling technique and to evaluate the relationship between blood volume and pain. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (type 1 or type 2 diabetes) performed 8 fingersticks using their own lancing device and preferred depth setting and lancing technique. Eight different commercially available lancing systems were used (8 patients/system). Blood volume and perceived pain were recorded after each fingerstick. RESULTS: The mean blood volume across all patients was 3.1 µL (512 fingersticks), with 97% of patients expressing a mean of ≥1.0 µL of blood. There was no correlation between pain response and the volume of blood expressed. Nearly all patients agreed that they could easily and comfortably obtain a 1-µL blood sample, and most patients actually preferred a larger drop size to ease sampling and avoid wasting strips. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence across 8 lancing systems that challenge the current perceptions that patients with diabetes struggle to produce sufficient blood samples to fill most test strips, including those with 1-µL fill requirements, and that obtaining larger volumes of blood is more painful. These results are consistent with the previous literature suggesting that patients derive no real benefits from very low strip volumes and generally prefer a blood drop size that enables them to confidently fill their test strip.
BACKGROUND: There is a perception that patients with diabetes struggle to produce sufficient blood to fill glucose test strips, including strips with 1-µL fill requirements. The purpose of this study was to determine the volume of blood expressed when these patients perform routine fingersticks using their own lancing device and sampling technique and to evaluate the relationship between blood volume and pain. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (type 1 or type 2 diabetes) performed 8 fingersticks using their own lancing device and preferred depth setting and lancing technique. Eight different commercially available lancing systems were used (8 patients/system). Blood volume and perceived pain were recorded after each fingerstick. RESULTS: The mean blood volume across all patients was 3.1 µL (512 fingersticks), with 97% of patients expressing a mean of ≥1.0 µL of blood. There was no correlation between pain response and the volume of blood expressed. Nearly all patients agreed that they could easily and comfortably obtain a 1-µL blood sample, and most patients actually preferred a larger drop size to ease sampling and avoid wasting strips. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence across 8 lancing systems that challenge the current perceptions that patients with diabetes struggle to produce sufficient blood samples to fill most test strips, including those with 1-µL fill requirements, and that obtaining larger volumes of blood is more painful. These results are consistent with the previous literature suggesting that patients derive no real benefits from very low strip volumes and generally prefer a blood drop size that enables them to confidently fill their test strip.
Authors: Jean-Pierre Le Floch; Bernard Bauduceau; Marc Lévy; Helen Mosnier-Pudar; Claude Sachon; Benedicte Kakou Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kellee M Miller; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Robin S Goland; Michael J Haller; Janet B McGill; Henry Rodriguez; Jill H Simmons; Irl B Hirsch Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nicholas X Williams; Brittani Carroll; Steven G Noyce; Hansel Alex Hobbie; Daniel Y Joh; Joseph G Rogers; Aaron D Franklin Journal: Biosens Bioelectron Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 10.618
Authors: Léia Alves Kaneto; Elaine Buchhorn Cintra Damião; Maria de La Ó Ramallo Verissimo; Lisabelle Mariano Rossato; Aurea Tamami Minagawa Toriyama; Regina Szylit Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2018-10-25