Literature DB >> 24876195

Biomechanics and control of landing in toads.

Gary Gillis1, Laura Ekstrom2, Emanuel Azizi2.   

Abstract

Anything that jumps must land, but unlike during jumping when muscles produce energy to accelerate the body into the air, controlled landing requires muscles to dissipate energy and decelerate the body. Among anurans, toads (genus Bufo) exhibit highly coordinated landing behaviors, using their forelimbs to stabilize the body after touch-down as they lower their hindlimbs to the ground. Moreover, toads land frequently, as they cover distances by stringing together long series of relatively short hops. We have been using toads as a model to understand the biomechanics and motor control strategies of coordinated landing. Our results show that toads prepare for landing differently depending on how far they hop. For example, the forelimbs are extended farther prior to impact after long hops than after short ones. Such kinematic alterations are mirrored by predictable modulation of the recruitment intensity of forelimb muscles before impact, such that longer hops lead to higher levels of pre-landing recruitment of muscles. These differences in kinematics and muscular activity help to control the most flexed configuration of the elbow that is achieved after impact, which in turn constrains the extent to which muscles involved in dissipating energy are stretched. Indeed, a combination of in vivo and in vitro experiments has shown that the elbow-extending anconeus muscle, which is stretched during landing as the elbow flexes, rarely reaches lengths longer than those on the plateau of the muscle's length-tension curve (where damage becomes more likely). We have also been studying how movements of the hindlimbs after take-off help to stabilize animals during landing. In particular, the immediate and rapid flexion of a toad's knees after take-off leads to a repositioning of the animal's center of mass (COM) that better aligns it with ground-reaction forces (GRFs) at impact and reduces torques that would destabilize the animal. Finally, recent work on sensory feedback involved in preparation for landing demonstrates that vision is not required for coordinated landing. Toads can effectively utilize proprioceptive and/or vestibular information during take-off to help inform themselves about landing conditions, but may also use other sensory modalities after take-off to modulate landing behavior.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876195     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icu053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  8 in total

1.  Sensory feedback and coordinating asymmetrical landing in toads.

Authors:  S M Cox; Gary B Gillis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Peking geckos (Gekko swinhonis) traversing upward steps: the effect of step height on the transition from horizontal to vertical locomotion.

Authors:  Jiwei Yuan; Yi Song; Zhouyi Wang; Zhendong Dai
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.389

3.  Vision fine-tunes preparation for landing in the cane toad, Rhinella marina.

Authors:  Laura J Ekstrom; Chris Panzini; Gary B Gillis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Evidence toads may modulate landing preparation without predicting impact time.

Authors:  S M Cox; Gary Gillis
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.422

5.  Anuran forelimb muscle tendinous structures and their relationship with locomotor modes and habitat use.

Authors:  Silvia De Oliveira-Lagôa; Félix B Cruz; Débora L Moreno Azócar; Esteban O Lavilla; Virginia Abdala
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Jumping with adhesion: landing surface incline alters impact force and body kinematics in crested geckos.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Mara N S Hofmann; Michelle Modert; Marc Thielen; Thomas Speck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Diversity and function of the fused anuran radioulna.

Authors:  Rachel Keeffe; David C Blackburn
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.921

8.  Landing on branches in the frog Trachycephalus resinifictrix (Anura: Hylidae).

Authors:  Nienke N Bijma; Stanislav N Gorb; Thomas Kleinteich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 1.836

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.