| Literature DB >> 24875588 |
Tamás Székely1, Oliver Krüger2, E Tobias Krause3.
Abstract
Reviewers play a key role in science, although studies suggest the current peer-reviewing system has faults. We propose to introduce a quality control system to evaluate each journal's review process, and produce a Review Quality Index. We propose four schemes that have the potential to reduce errors in a key step in scientific decision making: the reviewing process.Keywords: fairness; peer reviewing; review quality; reviewers
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24875588 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712