Literature DB >> 24875588

Errors in science: the role of reviewers.

Tamás Székely1, Oliver Krüger2, E Tobias Krause3.   

Abstract

Reviewers play a key role in science, although studies suggest the current peer-reviewing system has faults. We propose to introduce a quality control system to evaluate each journal's review process, and produce a Review Quality Index. We propose four schemes that have the potential to reduce errors in a key step in scientific decision making: the reviewing process.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  fairness; peer reviewing; review quality; reviewers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875588     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  2 in total

1.  The Academic, Societal and Animal Welfare Benefits of Open Science for Animal Science.

Authors:  Christian Nawroth; E Tobias Krause
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  Opening Pandora's box: cause and impact of errors on plant pigment studies.

Authors:  Beatriz Fernández-Marín; Unai Artetxe; Oihana Barrutia; Raquel Esteban; Antonio Hernández; José I García-Plazaola
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.