Literature DB >> 24875427

Allometric scaling of strength scores in NCAA division I-A football athletes.

Yukiya Oba1, Ronald K Hetzler, Christopher D Stickley, Kaori Tamura, Iris F Kimura, Thomas P Heffernan.   

Abstract

This study examined population-specific allometric exponents to control for the effect of body mass (BM) on bench press, clean, and squat strength measures among Division I-A collegiate football athletes. One repetition maximum data were obtained from a university pre-season football strength assessment (bench press, n = 207; clean, n = 88; and squat n = 86) and categorized into 3 groups by positions (line, linebacker, and skill). Regression diagnostics and correlations of scaled strength data to BM were used to assess the efficacy of the allometric scaling model and contrasted with that of ratio scaling and theoretically based allometric exponents of 0.67 and 0.33. The log-linear regression models yielded the following exponents (b): b = 0.559, 0.287, and 0.496 for bench press, clean, and squat, respectively. Correlations between bench press, clean, and squat to BM were r = -0.024, -0.047, and -0.018, respectively, suggesting that the derived allometric exponents were effective in partialling out the effect of BM on these lifts and removing between-group differences. Conversely, unscaled, ratio-scaled, and allometrically scaled (b = 0.67 or 0.33) data resulted in significant differences between groups. It is suggested that the exponents derived in the present study be used for allometrically scaling strength measures in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I-A football athletes. Use of the normative percentile rank scores provide coaches and trainers with a valid means of judging the effectiveness of their training programs by allowing comparisons between individuals without the confounding influence of BM.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875427     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Influence of Sex and Maximum Strength on Reactive Strength Index-Modified.

Authors:  George K Beckham; Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher J Sole; Christopher A Bailey; Jacob L Grazer; Steven B Kim; Kasie B Talbot; Michael H Stone
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tyler D Williams; Danilo V Tolusso; Michael V Fedewa; Michael R Esco
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Electromyographic amplitude versus torque relationships are different in young versus postmenopausal females and are related to muscle mass after controlling for bodyweight.

Authors:  Nile F Banks; Emily M Rogers; Nathaniel D M Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.078

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.