Literature DB >> 24875367

Positive animal welfare states and encouraging environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours.

D J Mellor1.   

Abstract

Affective neuroscience, incorporating neurophysiology and neuropsychology, is providing increasing evidence that certain behaviours of animals may be interpreted in terms of what they are intending to achieve, i.e. their goals. It is also providing evidence that allows inferences to be made about the affective contents of some goal-directed behaviours. These neuroscience-supported inferences are aligned with recommendations based on prior behaviour-based investigations of animals' preferences, aversions and priorities, and these observations together support the cautious use of particular behaviours to infer what the accompanying affects may be. In this review, therefore, some attention is given to negative affects and their relationships to poor animal welfare, but the primary focus is the positive affects animals may experience when they successfully engage in rewarding goal-directed behaviours, encapsulated in the concept of positive affective engagement. The review draws together reports of environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours observed in a range of species and under diverse circumstances in order to illustrate the likely widespread occurrence of the positive affects that may accompany them. Particular consideration is given to affects that are potentially associated with some aspects of exploration and food acquisition in stimulus rich or impoverished environments, and to those that may be associated with aspects of the affiliative interactions of bonding or bond affirmation, maternal care, play and sexual activity. It is concluded that animals given the opportunity to engage in such activities may experience some positive affects. However, the intensity of an animal's experience of particular positive affects is likely to range from zero to very high because the associated behaviours occur intermittently, variation may occur during different phases of a goal-directed behaviour, and other positive or negative affects experienced at the same time may have greater impact. As good welfare is achieved both by minimising negative affects and promoting positive ones and as conscious sentient animals may be expected to have an interest in experiencing as little pain and as much pleasure as possible, it is argued that there is an ethical obligation to take practical steps to help them to achieve these outcomes. Such steps would include providing them with opportunities to express more behaviours that are associated with rewarding or satisfying experiences understood in terms of positive affective engagement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective neuroscience; bonding; energised exploration; food acquisition; maternal care; play; positive welfare; sexual activity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875367     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  25 in total

1.  Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living".

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare.

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Equine Welfare during Exercise: An Evaluation of Breathing, Breathlessness and Bridles.

Authors:  David J Mellor; Ngaio J Beausoleil
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Long Term Physiologic and Behavioural Effects of Housing Density and Environmental Resource Provision for Adult Male and Female Sprague Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Christopher J Pinelli; Francesco Leri; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model.

Authors:  Katherine E Littlewood; David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Forensic Use of the Five Domains Model for Assessing Suffering in Cases of Animal Cruelty.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ledger; David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life.

Authors:  Sarah Wolfensohn; Justine Shotton; Hannah Bowley; Siân Davies; Sarah Thompson; William S M Justice
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Zoo agent's measure in applying the five freedoms principles for animal welfare.

Authors:  Argyo Demartoto; Robertus Bellarminus Soemanto; Siti Zunariyah
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-09-03

Review 9.  Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" by Updating the "Five Provisions" and Introducing Aligned "Animal Welfare Aims".

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Mouth Pain in Horses: Physiological Foundations, Behavioural Indices, Welfare Implications, and a Suggested Solution.

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.