Literature DB >> 24875122

Is venous thromboprophylaxis necessary in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for a gynecologic malignancy?

Geneviève Bouchard-Fortier1, William H Geerts2, Allan Covens3, Danielle Vicus3, Rachel Kupets3, Lilian T Gien4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current recommendations for the use of venous thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for a gynecologic malignancy are derived from patients undergoing open surgery. Our objective was to determine the 30-day prevalence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after laparoscopic gynecologic oncology procedures in patients who received no thromboprophylaxis.
METHODS: Between January 2006 and September 2013, women who underwent MIS for endometrial, cervical or ovarian cancer at a single institution were included. Data on patient demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, perioperative characteristics, use of thromboprophylaxis, and diagnosis of VTE were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS: Of the 419 patients who underwent MIS for a gynecologic cancer, 352 (84%) received no VTE prophylaxis. At least a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (simple or radical) or pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 95% of these patients. The median length of surgery was 137 min and 95% of patients were discharged home within 1 day of surgery. The rate of VTE in the 352 untreated patients was 0.57% (1 pulmonary embolism and 1 deep vein thrombosis). There were no VTE diagnosed within 30 days of surgery in the 67 patients who received anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.
CONCLUSION: The rate of VTE is low in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for a gynecologic malignancy despite no VTE prophylaxis. The benefits of routine use of VTE prophylaxis in this population are questionable.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecologic malignancies; Minimally invasive surgery; Thromboprophylaxis; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875122     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism by Type of Gynecologic Malignancy and Surgical Modality in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Ashley Graul; Nawar Latif; Xiaochen Zhang; Lorraine T Dean; Mark Morgan; Robert Giuntoli; Robert Burger; Sarah Kim; Emily Ko
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 2.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology surgery.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  S Pin; J Mateshaytis; S Ghosh; E Batuyong; J C Easaw
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Effectiveness and safety of expanded perioperative thromboprophylaxis in complex gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Andrea M Winter; Mary D Sammel; Christina S Chu; Brian F Gage; Andrea R Hagemann
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A risk score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in gynecologic cancer: The Thrombogyn score.

Authors:  Lucy A Norris; Mark P Ward; Sharon A O'Toole; Zibi Marchocki; Nadia Ibrahim; Ali S Khashan; Feras Abu Saadeh; Noreen Gleeson
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  The limited utility of currently available venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools in gynecological oncology patients.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Analysis of deep venous thrombosis after Gynecological surgery: A clinical study of 498 cases.

Authors:  Lihua Zhang; Xiancui Liu; Yunxia Xue
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Safety and Cost Considerations during the Introduction Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Anagnostopoulos; S Mitra; B Decruze; R Macdonald; J Kirwan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2017-01-10

9.  Different combination strategies for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Cui-Qin Sang; Na Zhao; Jian Zhang; Shu-Zhen Wang; Shu-Li Guo; Shu-Hong Li; Ying Jiang; Bin Li; Jian-Liu Wang; Lei Song; Jian-Jun Zhai; Zhen-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Efficacy of pre-operative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis on incidence of venous thromboembolism following major gynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven Bisch; Rachelle Findley; Christina Ince; Maria Nardell; Gregg Nelson
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.