Verónica Gumbau1, Juan García-Armengol2, Antonio Salvador-Martínez1, Purificación Ivorra1, María José García-Coret1, Vicente García-Rodríguez1, José Vicente Roig3. 1. Unidad de Coloproctología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, España. 2. Unidad de Coloproctología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, España; Unidad de Coloproctología, Hospital Nisa 9 de Octubre, Centro Europeo de Cirugía Colorrectal, Valencia, España. 3. Unidad de Coloproctología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, España; Unidad de Coloproctología, Hospital Nisa 9 de Octubre, Centro Europeo de Cirugía Colorrectal, Valencia, España. Electronic address: roigvila@telefonica.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The association of a loop ileostomy decreases the severity of complications after rectal surgery but can increase the postoperative stay. The aim of this study is to investigate if a diverting ileostomy influences the postoperative outcomes in a series of patients included in a multimodal rehabilitation program (MMRP). METHODS: We analyzed a series of 104 patients that underwent elective surgery with primary anastomosis for rectal adenocarcinoma using a MMRP: 66 men and 38 women, with a median age of 64 (IQR: 55-75) years. Group A included patients with an associated loop ileostomy, and Group B, those without a protective stoma. RESULTS: Group A = 58, group B = 46 patients without differences in age, ASA, BMI and other risk factors, nor in the surgical approach (laparoscopic in 34%), although there were more neoadjuvant treatments in group A: 77.5 vs. 36.9%; P=.001. In group A, the most common operation was total mesorectal excision (96%) and in the B, a subtotal mesorectal excision (90%). There were no differences in postoperative complications (Group A 34.4 vs. group B28.2%; P=.322), anastomotic leaks (8.3 vs. 10.8%; P=.475), or postoperative ileus (20.7 vs. 10.9%; P=.140), neither in postoperative stay (7.9 vs. 6.9 days; P= .058, readmissions (7 vs. 13.6%; P= .22), or postoperative stay, including readmissions (8.4 vs. 9.1 days; P= .49). CONCLUSIONS: The association of a loop ileostomy does not extend the length of stay nor increases the rate of complications in patients that underwent a rectal resection with anastomosis included in a MMRP.
PURPOSE: The association of a loop ileostomy decreases the severity of complications after rectal surgery but can increase the postoperative stay. The aim of this study is to investigate if a diverting ileostomy influences the postoperative outcomes in a series of patients included in a multimodal rehabilitation program (MMRP). METHODS: We analyzed a series of 104 patients that underwent elective surgery with primary anastomosis for rectal adenocarcinoma using a MMRP: 66 men and 38 women, with a median age of 64 (IQR: 55-75) years. Group A included patients with an associated loop ileostomy, and Group B, those without a protective stoma. RESULTS: Group A = 58, group B = 46 patients without differences in age, ASA, BMI and other risk factors, nor in the surgical approach (laparoscopic in 34%), although there were more neoadjuvant treatments in group A: 77.5 vs. 36.9%; P=.001. In group A, the most common operation was total mesorectal excision (96%) and in the B, a subtotal mesorectal excision (90%). There were no differences in postoperative complications (Group A 34.4 vs. group B28.2%; P=.322), anastomotic leaks (8.3 vs. 10.8%; P=.475), or postoperative ileus (20.7 vs. 10.9%; P=.140), neither in postoperative stay (7.9 vs. 6.9 days; P= .058, readmissions (7 vs. 13.6%; P= .22), or postoperative stay, including readmissions (8.4 vs. 9.1 days; P= .49). CONCLUSIONS: The association of a loop ileostomy does not extend the length of stay nor increases the rate of complications in patients that underwent a rectal resection with anastomosis included in a MMRP.
Authors: Magdalena Pisarska; Natalia Gajewska; Piotr Małczak; Michał Wysocki; Jan Witowski; Grzegorz Torbicz; Piotr Major; Magdalena Mizera; Marcin Dembiński; Marcin Migaczewski; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-04-17