Literature DB >> 24874951

Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.

Julian G Leprince1, William M Palin2, Julie Vanacker3, Joseph Sabbagh4, Jacques Devaux5, Gaetane Leloup6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bulk-fill composites have emerged, arguably, as a new "class" of resin-based composites, which are claimed to enable restoration in thick layers, up to 4mm. The objective of this work was to compare, under optimal curing conditions, the physico-mechanical properties of most currently available bulk-fill composites to those of two conventional composite materials chosen as references, one highly filled and one flowable "nano-hybrid" composite.
METHODS: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar-Vivadent), Venus Bulk Fill (Heraeus-Kulzer), SDR (Dentsply), X-tra Fil (VOCO), X-tra Base (VOCO), Sonic Fill (Kerr), Filtek Bulk Fill (3M-Espe), Xenius (GC) were compared to the two reference materials. The materials were light-cured for 40s in a 2mm×2mm×25mm Teflon mould. Degree of conversion was measured by Raman spectroscopy, Elastic modulus and flexural strength were evaluated by three point bending, surface hardness using Vickers microindentation before and after 24h ethanol storage, and filler weight content by thermogravimetric analysis. The ratio of surface hardness before and after ethanol storage was considered as an evaluation of polymer softening. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test (p=0.05).
RESULTS: The mechanical properties of the bulk-fill composites were mostly lower compared with the conventional high viscosity material, and, at best, comparable to the conventional flowable composite. Linear correlations of the mechanical properties investigated were poor with degree of conversion (0.09<R<0.41) and good with filler content (R>0.8). Softening in ethanol revealed differences in polymer network density between material types.
CONCLUSION: The reduction of time and improvement of convenience associated with bulk-fill materials is a clear advantage of this particular material class. However, a compromise with mechanical properties compared with more conventional commercially-available nano-hybrid materials was demonstrated by the present work. SIGNIFICANCE: Given the lower mechanical properties of most bulk-fill materials compared to a highly filled nano-hybrid composite, their use for restorations under high occlusal load is subject to caution. Further, the swelling behaviour of some of the bulk-fill materials may be a reason for concern, which highlights the critical requirement for a veneering material, not only to improve aesthetic quality of the translucent material, but to reduce the impact of degradation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulk-fill; Degree of conversion; Dental composite; Elastic modulus; Flexural strength; Microhardness; Polymer network density

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24874951     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  71 in total

1.  Influence of increment thickness on light transmission, degree of conversion and micro hardness of bulk fill composites.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Pekka Vallittu; Akikazu Shinya; Lippo Lassila
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  New Resins for Dental Composites.

Authors:  A P P Fugolin; C S Pfeifer
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Long Term Degree of Conversion of two Bulk-Fill Composites.

Authors:  Matej Par; Matea Lapas-Barisic; Ozren Gamulin; Vlatko Panduric; Nika Spanovic; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2016-12

4.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Emel Karaman; Busra Keskin; Ugur Inan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.

Authors:  Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; Vellore K Gopinath; Spiros Zinelis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite.

Authors:  Almira Isufi; Gianluca Plotino; Nicola Maria Grande; Pietro Ioppolo; Luca Testarelli; Rossella Bedini; Dina Al-Sudani; Gianluca Gambarini
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-07-19

8.  How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites?

Authors:  Sung-Ae Son; Jeong-Kil Park; Deog-Gyu Seo; Ching-Chang Ko; Yong Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Effect of Different Composite Restorations on the Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Different Insertion Techniques- An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Sakshi Singhal; Anuraag Gurtu; Anurag Singhal; Rashmi Bansal; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

10.  Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Frank Engelhardt; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.