PURPOSE: A major research gap is determining the best age to perform an appendicostomy or cecostomy. This study hypothesizes that performance of appendicostomy/cecostomy prior to starting school (<6 years) would improve functional stooling and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Patients who underwent appendicostomy/cecostomy for bowel management between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively identified. Families were prospectively surveyed regarding current stooling habits (17 items) and a (7 item) pediatric QOL survey. Lower stooling survey scores represent better bowel control. Higher QOL scores indicated better quality. The primary outcome was to correlate age of appendicostomy/cecostomy to QOL score. Statistics were performed using paired, unpaired t tests, and Chi-square. p Values ≤0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: 35 patients underwent placement of appendicostomy/cecostomy. Fourteen (40%) patients/families were prospectively contacted (<6, n = 6; >6, n = 8). Stooling scores (15.17 ± 1.35 vs. 22.25 ± 1.70; for <6 vs. >6 years old, p = 0.009) and continence scores (6.33 ± 1.45 vs. 11.13 ± 1.64; p = 0.06), at time of contacting families, were significantly better in those undergoing appendicostomy/cecostomy in the <6 group. Pre-procedure QOL scores for the two groups were similar (p = 0.89). Post-procedure QOL significantly increased to the good subcategory for both age groups; however improvement was significantly better in the <6 age group vs. ≥6 group: 6.33 ± 0.92 vs. 3.13 ± 0.91 points (p = 0.03). A secondary parent survey showed significantly more families wished an appendicostomy/cecostomy were done earlier in the >6 vs. <6 group (87.5 vs. 33%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Early placement of cecostomy or appendicostomy as part of a bowel management program may contribute to improved QOL and functional stooling.
PURPOSE: A major research gap is determining the best age to perform an appendicostomy or cecostomy. This study hypothesizes that performance of appendicostomy/cecostomy prior to starting school (<6 years) would improve functional stooling and quality of life (QOL). METHODS:Patients who underwent appendicostomy/cecostomy for bowel management between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively identified. Families were prospectively surveyed regarding current stooling habits (17 items) and a (7 item) pediatric QOL survey. Lower stooling survey scores represent better bowel control. Higher QOL scores indicated better quality. The primary outcome was to correlate age of appendicostomy/cecostomy to QOL score. Statistics were performed using paired, unpaired t tests, and Chi-square. p Values ≤0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: 35 patients underwent placement of appendicostomy/cecostomy. Fourteen (40%) patients/families were prospectively contacted (<6, n = 6; >6, n = 8). Stooling scores (15.17 ± 1.35 vs. 22.25 ± 1.70; for <6 vs. >6 years old, p = 0.009) and continence scores (6.33 ± 1.45 vs. 11.13 ± 1.64; p = 0.06), at time of contacting families, were significantly better in those undergoing appendicostomy/cecostomy in the <6 group. Pre-procedure QOL scores for the two groups were similar (p = 0.89). Post-procedure QOL significantly increased to the good subcategory for both age groups; however improvement was significantly better in the <6 age group vs. ≥6 group: 6.33 ± 0.92 vs. 3.13 ± 0.91 points (p = 0.03). A secondary parent survey showed significantly more families wished an appendicostomy/cecostomy were done earlier in the >6 vs. <6 group (87.5 vs. 33%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Early placement of cecostomy or appendicostomy as part of a bowel management program may contribute to improved QOL and functional stooling.
Authors: Mohamed I El-Sawaf; Robert A Drongowski; Jennifer N Chamberlain; Arnold G Coran; Daniel H Teitelbaum Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Mohamed S Hashish; Hamada H Dawoud; Ronald B Hirschl; Steven W Bruch; Akram M El Batarny; George B Mychaliska; Robert A Drongowski; Peter F Ehrlich; Sayed Z Hassaballa; Nagi I El-Dosuky; Daniel H Teitelbaum Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Pernilla Stenström; Christina Granéli; Martin Salö; Kristine Hagelsteen; Einar Arnbjörnsson Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: João H F Colares; Marionescu Purcaru; Guilherme P F da Silva; Mirna A Frota; Carlos A B da Silva; Antônio A Melo-Filho; Andrea Bischoff; Alberto Peña Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Clara Chong; Neil Featherstone; Shazia Sharif; Abraham Cherian; Peter Cuckow; Imran Mushtaq; Paolo De Coppi; Kate Cross; Joseph Curry Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 1.827