Literature DB >> 24874297

Can the effect of transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking be improved by increasing the duration of topical riboflavin application? An in vivo confocal microscopy study.

Banu Torun Acar1, Canan Asli Utine, Vildan Ozturk, Suphi Acar, Ferda Ciftci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) with prolonged riboflavin application by in vivo confocal microscopy and to compare this effect with that of standard CXL with complete epithelial debridement.
METHODS: In eyes with progressive keratoconus, CXL procedure was performed with standard technique and transepithelial technique after prolonged riboflavin drop application for 2 hr. Patients were evaluated with in vivo confocal microscopic examination preoperatively and at postoperative months 1 and 6.
RESULTS: The depth of CXL effect was similar in both groups (i.e., 380.86 ± 103.23 μm in standard CXL group and 342.2 ± 68.6 μm in transepithelial CXL group) (P=0.4). The endothelial cell counts and morphological parameters (i.e., pleomorphism and polymegathism) were not significantly affected in both groups (P>0.05 for all). In the standard CXL group, in vivo confocal microscopy revealed anterior stromal acellular hyperreflective honeycomb edema with posteriorly gradually decreasing reflectivity and increasing number of keratocytes and some sheets of longitudinally aligned filamentary deposits. The keratocytes were seen to repopulate in the posterior-to-anterior direction. In transepithelial CXL group, although the depth of CXL effect was similar, less pronounced keratocyte damage, extracellular matrix hyperreflectivity, and sheets of filamentary deposits at the posterior stroma was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Transepithelial CXL with prolonged peroperative riboflavin application can achieve similar depth of effect in the stroma with less pronounced confocal microscopic changes as compared with the standard CXL with complete epithelial debridement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24874297     DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  5 in total

1.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Kristina B Lindsley; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.488

Review 5.  Collagen cross-linking: when and how? A review of the state of the art of the technique and new perspectives.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.