Literature DB >> 24874258

Focused attention improves working memory: implications for flexible-resource and discrete-capacity models.

Alessandra S Souza1, Laura Rerko, Hsuan-Yu Lin, Klaus Oberauer.   

Abstract

Performance in working memory (WM) tasks depends on the capacity for storing objects and on the allocation of attention to these objects. Here, we explored how capacity models need to be augmented to account for the benefit of focusing attention on the target of recall. Participants encoded six colored disks (Experiment 1) or a set of one to eight colored disks (Experiment 2) and were cued to recall the color of a target on a color wheel. In the no-delay condition, the recall-cue was presented after a 1,000-ms retention interval, and participants could report the retrieved color immediately. In the delay condition, the recall-cue was presented at the same time as in the no-delay condition, but the opportunity to report the color was delayed. During this delay, participants could focus attention exclusively on the target. Responses deviated less from the target's color in the delay than in the no-delay condition. Mixture modeling assigned this benefit to a reduction in guessing (Experiments 1 and 2) and transposition errors (Experiment 2). We tested several computational models implementing flexible or discrete capacity allocation, aiming to explain both the effect of set size, reflecting the limited capacity of WM, and the effect of delay, reflecting the role of attention to WM representations. Both models fit the data better when a spatially graded source of transposition error is added to its assumptions. The benefits of focusing attention could be explained by allocating to this object a higher proportion of the capacity to represent color.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24874258     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0687-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

1.  Introduction to the special issue on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The lasting memory enhancements of retrospective attention.

Authors:  Sarah Reaves; Jonathan Strunk; Shekinah Phillips; Paul Verhaeghen; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Eren Gunseli; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Robert Taylor
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Selective attention on representations in working memory: cognitive and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Yixuan Ku
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Danique Jeurissen; Jan Theeuwes; Damiaan Denys; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Theresa Wildegger; Glyn Humphreys; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Chaoxiong Ye; Zhonghua Hu; Tapani Ristaniemi; Maria Gendron; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Working Memory and Consciousness: The Current State of Play.

Authors:  Marjan Persuh; Eric LaRock; Jacob Berger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.