Literature DB >> 24874257

Perceptual hysteresis in the judgment of auditory pitch shift.

Claire Chambers1, Daniel Pressnitzer.   

Abstract

Perceptual hysteresis can be defined as the enduring influence of the recent past on current perception. Here, hysteresis was investigated in a basic auditory task: pitch comparisons between successive tones. On each trial, listeners were presented with pairs of tones and asked to report the direction of subjective pitch shift, as either "up" or "down." All tones were complexes known as Shepard tones (Shepard, 1964), which comprise several frequency components at octave multiples of a base frequency. The results showed that perceptual judgments were determined both by stimulus-related factors (the interval ratio between the base frequencies within a pair) and by recent context (the intervals in the two previous trials). When tones were presented in ordered sequences, for which the frequency interval between tones was varied in a progressive manner, strong hysteresis was found. In particular, ambiguous stimuli that led to equal probabilities of "up" and "down" responses within a randomized context were almost fully determined within an ordered context. Moreover, hysteresis did not act on the direction of the reported pitch shift, but rather on the perceptual representation of each tone. Thus, hysteresis could be observed within sequences in which listeners varied between "up" and "down" responses, enabling us to largely rule out confounds related to response bias. The strength of the perceptual hysteresis observed suggests that the ongoing context may have a substantial influence on fundamental aspects of auditory perception, such as how we perceive the changes in pitch between successive sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24874257     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0676-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements.

Authors:  C Pelofi; V de Gardelle; P Egré; D Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Rule-based and stimulus-based cues bias auditory decisions via different computational and physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Nathan Tardiff; Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj; Yale E Cohen; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Effect of Context on the Contribution of Individual Harmonics to Residue Pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Sami Alsindi; Charles Hardy; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-28

4.  Prior context in audition informs binding and shapes simple features.

Authors:  Claire Chambers; Sahar Akram; Vincent Adam; Claire Pelofi; Maneesh Sahani; Shihab Shamma; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Pitch Class and Envelope Effects in the Tritone Paradox Are Mediated by Differently Pronounced Frequency Preference Regions.

Authors:  Stephanie Malek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-28

6.  Recurrent processing improves occluded object recognition and gives rise to perceptual hysteresis.

Authors:  Markus R Ernst; Thomas Burwick; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A neuronal network model for context-dependence of pitch change perception.

Authors:  Chengcheng Huang; Bernhard Englitz; Shihab Shamma; John Rinzel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Aftereffects of Spectrally Similar and Dissimilar Spectral Motion Adaptors in the Tritone Paradox.

Authors:  Stephanie Malek; Konrad Sperschneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-08

9.  Propagation and update of auditory perceptual priors through alpha and theta rhythms.

Authors:  Hao Tam Ho; David C Burr; David Alais; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.