Thomas Arnhjort1, Jonas Nordberg2, Martin Delle2, Carl-Johan Borgis2, Stefan Rosfors2, Gerd Lärfars2. 1. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: thomas.arnhjort@telia.com. 2. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) can be divided into idiopathic and effort thrombosis. Anatomical factors probably play an important role in effort thrombosis, whereas the cause remains mostly unknown in idiopathic thrombosis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to examine the anatomy of the subclavian region and evaluate how these factors contribute to primary UEDVT. The secondary objective was to investigate if venous compression correlates with post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients and 15 controls were enrolled in the study. The subclavian region (the costoclavicular distance and vessel area) was examined by MRI enhanced by a blood-pool contrast agent (Vasovist). The MRI was performed in two arm positions: alongside and elevated. PTS and disability were quantified with the modified Villalta score and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) test. RESULTS: The costoclavicular distance was significantly narrower in the UEDVT patients with the arms alongside the body but there was a significant difference only in the left arm with the arms elevated. Area of the subclavian vein: When comparing the patients non-thrombotic arm with the controls, there was a significant difference only when the arms in the supine position. Disability: There was a high correlation between DASH, Villalta and VAS but no correlation between the MRI measurement and patient's symptoms or the Villalta Score. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that primary UEDVT is dependent on the subclavian anatomy and area of vena subclavia.
BACKGROUND:Primary upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) can be divided into idiopathic and effort thrombosis. Anatomical factors probably play an important role in effort thrombosis, whereas the cause remains mostly unknown in idiopathic thrombosis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to examine the anatomy of the subclavian region and evaluate how these factors contribute to primary UEDVT. The secondary objective was to investigate if venous compression correlates with post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients and 15 controls were enrolled in the study. The subclavian region (the costoclavicular distance and vessel area) was examined by MRI enhanced by a blood-pool contrast agent (Vasovist). The MRI was performed in two arm positions: alongside and elevated. PTS and disability were quantified with the modified Villalta score and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) test. RESULTS: The costoclavicular distance was significantly narrower in the UEDVT patients with the arms alongside the body but there was a significant difference only in the left arm with the arms elevated. Area of the subclavian vein: When comparing the patients non-thrombotic arm with the controls, there was a significant difference only when the arms in the supine position. Disability: There was a high correlation between DASH, Villalta and VAS but no correlation between the MRI measurement and patient's symptoms or the Villalta Score. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that primary UEDVT is dependent on the subclavian anatomy and area of vena subclavia.