Literature DB >> 24872361

Estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Ying-Qi Zhao1, Eric B Laber2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in medical research suggest that the optimal treatment rules should be adaptive to patients over time. This has led to an increasing interest in studying dynamic treatment regime, a sequence of individualized treatment rules, one per stage of clinical intervention, which maps present patient information to a recommended treatment. There has been a recent surge of statistical work for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes from randomized and observational studies. The purpose of this article is to review recent methodological progress and applied issues associated with estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
METHODS: We discuss sequential multiple assignment randomized trials, a clinical trial design used to study treatment sequences. We use a common estimator of an optimal dynamic treatment regime that applies to sequential multiple assignment randomized trials data as a platform to discuss several practical and methodological issues.
RESULTS: We provide a limited survey of practical issues associated with modeling sequential multiple assignment randomized trials data. We review some existing estimators of optimal dynamic treatment regimes and discuss practical issues associated with these methods including model building, missing data, statistical inference, and choosing an outcome when only non-responders are re-randomized. We mainly focus on the estimation and inference of dynamic treatment regimes using sequential multiple assignment randomized trials data. Dynamic treatment regimes can also be constructed from observational data, which may be easier to obtain in practice; however, care must be taken to account for potential confounding.
© The Author(s), 2014.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24872361      PMCID: PMC4247353          DOI: 10.1177/1740774514532570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  39 in total

1.  When to start treatment? A systematic approach to the comparison of dynamic regimes using observational data.

Authors:  Lauren E Cain; James M Robins; Emilie Lanoy; Roger Logan; Dominique Costagliola; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Generalization Error for Q-Learning.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.654

4.  Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction.

Authors:  Daniel E Rivera; Michael D Pew; Linda M Collins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Scott N Compton; Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel; Naihua Duan; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A randomized, controlled phase III study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine with etoposide (CAV-E) or teniposide (CAV-T), followed by recombinant interferon-alpha maintenance therapy or observation, in small cell lung carcinoma patients with complete responses.

Authors:  D Tummarello; D Mari; F Graziano; P Isidori; G Cetto; F Pasini; A Santo; R Cellerino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Effects of methylphenidate and expectancy on children with ADHD: behavior, academic performance, and attributions in a summer treatment program and regular classroom settings.

Authors:  William E Pelham; Betsy Hoza; David R Pillow; Elizabeth M Gnagy; Heidi L Kipp; Andrew R Greiner; Daniel A Waschbusch; Sarah T Trane; Joel Greenhouse; Lara Wolfson; Erin Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-04

9.  Methodological challenges in constructing effective treatment sequences for chronic psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy; David W Oslin; A John Rush; Ji Zhu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Q-learning residual analysis: application to the effectiveness of sequences of antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Susan Shortreed; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  LIBERTI: A SMART study in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hibbard; Jonathan S Friedstat; Sonia M Thomas; Renee E Edkins; C Scott Hultman; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Innovative trial approaches in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: current use and future potential.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Theophile Bigirumurame; Svetlana Cherlin; Luke Ouma; Haiyan Zheng; James M S Wason
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.