Literature DB >> 24871876

Results of uncemented hemiarthroplasty as primary treatment of severe proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

P Andrés-Cano1, A Galán, J Arenas, B Del Águila, E Guerado.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze functional and radiologic results of a consecutive series of elderly patients who underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty as primary treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with severe proximal humerus fracture (three or four fragments and three- or four-fragment fracture dislocations) were treated with uncemented proximal humerus hemiarthroplasty. Patients were evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score, the Quick scale Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) Score, range of motion, residual pain, radiographic parameters, and complications including clinical and radiologic data of mobilization.
RESULTS: After a mean postoperative period of 20.57 months (range 12-42 months), the mean Constant-Murley Score was 44 points (20-57), the mean Quick-DASH score was 24 points (16-39), postoperative pain according to a mean visual analogue scale was 1 (0-8), active abduction was 50° (30-135), and active flexion 70° (20-120). There were no cases of infection, deep vein thrombosis, dislocation, blood transfusions, or reoperation because of prosthetic loosening. Bivariate analysis of demographic data, radiologic findings, and other variables showed associations between duration of surgery and a higher Quick-DASH score (0.606; p = 0.037), and the number of sessions of rehabilitation with a higher Quick-DASH score (0.708; p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment of severe proximal humerus fractures in the elderly with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty are safe and promising; however, a comparative cohort study (cemented vs. uncemented) and long-term follow-up are still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24871876     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1487-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  26 in total

Review 1.  Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  I R Murray; A K Amin; T O White; C M Robinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

2.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Radiographic stability of ingrowth humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas W Throckmorton; Peter C Zarkadas; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Bone cement implantation syndrome.

Authors:  A J Donaldson; H E Thomson; N J Harper; N W Kenny
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Acute prosthetic replacement for severe fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  R J Hawkins; P Switlyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure.

Authors:  C A Compito; E B Self; L U Bigliani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Embolism detected by transoesophageal echocardiography during hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Lafont; W M Kostucki; P H Marchand; M N Michaux; J G Boogaerts
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Humeral head replacement for acute, four-part proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  A Green; W L Barnard; R S Limbird
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Severe Proximal Humerus Fracture and Correlation Between Deltoid Tuberosity Index and Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Dongjun Park; Hyojune Kim; Eui-Sup Lee; Myung Jin Shin; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures with conservation of the whole humeral head as autograft: does it improve greater tuberosity healing?

Authors:  Levon Doursounian; Julien Gaillard; Adeline Cambon-Binder; David Zbili; Alain Sautet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Safety and Effectiveness of Shoulder Arthroplasties in Spain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jorge Arias-de la Torre; Xavier Garcia; Kayla Smith; Arantxa Romero-Tamarit; Elisa Puigdomenech; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Jonathan P Evans; Vicente Martín; Antonio J Molina; Carles Torrens; Miquel Pons-Cabrafiga; Francesc Pallisó; Jose María Valderas; Mireia Espallargues
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Primary Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty: What Can Be Learned From 359 Cases That Were Surgically Revised?

Authors:  Daniel J Hackett; Jason E Hsu; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.