Thomas Steinkellner1, Liudmilla Mus2, Birgit Eisenrauch1, Andreea Constantinescu1, Damiana Leo3, Lisa Konrad1, Mattias Rickhag4, Gunnar Sørensen4, Evgenia V Efimova5, Eryan Kong6, Matthäus Willeit7, Tatyana D Sotnikova3, Oliver Kudlacek1, Ulrik Gether4, Michael Freissmuth1, Daniela D Pollak6, Raul R Gainetdinov8, Harald H Sitte1. 1. Institute of Pharmacology, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Strasse, Vienna, Austria. 2. 1] Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Morego, Genova, Italy [2] Department of Psychopharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Pavlov Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia. 3. Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Morego, Genova, Italy. 4. Molecular Neuropharmacology and Genetics Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Skolkovo, Moscow, Russia. 6. Department of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Strasse, Vienna, Austria. 7. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel, Vienna, Austria. 8. 1] Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Morego, Genova, Italy [2] Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Skolkovo, Moscow, Russia [3] Faculty of Biology and Soil Science, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia.
Abstract
Addiction to psychostimulants (ie, amphetamines and cocaine) imposes a major socioeconomic burden. Prevention and treatment represent unmet medical needs, which may be addressed, if the mechanisms underlying psychostimulant action are understood. Cocaine acts as a blocker at the transporters for dopamine (DAT), serotonin (SERT), and norepinephrine (NET), but amphetamines are substrates that do not only block the uptake of monoamines but also induce substrate efflux by promoting reverse transport. Reverse transport has been a focus of research for decades but its mechanistic basis still remains enigmatic. Recently, transporter-interacting proteins were found to regulate amphetamine-triggered reverse transport: calmodulin kinase IIα (αCaMKII) is a prominent example, because it binds the carboxyl terminus of DAT, phosphorylates its amino terminus, and supports amphetamine-induced substrate efflux in vitro. Here, we investigated whether, in vivo, the action of amphetamine was contingent on the presence of αCaMKII by recording the behavioral and neurochemical effects of amphetamine. Measurement of dopamine efflux in the dorsal striatum by microdialysis revealed that amphetamine induced less dopamine efflux in mice lacking αCaMKII. Consistent with this observation, the acute locomotor responses to amphetamine were also significantly blunted in αCaMKII-deficient mice. In addition, while the rewarding properties of amphetamine were preserved in αCaMKII-deficient mice, their behavioral sensitization to amphetamine was markedly reduced. Our findings demonstrate that amphetamine requires the presence of αCaMKII to elicit a full-fledged effect on DAT in vivo: αCaMKII does not only support acute amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux but is also important in shaping the chronic response to amphetamine.
Addiction to psychostimulants (ie, amphetamines and cocaine) imposes a major socioeconomic burden. Prevention and treatment represent unmet medical needs, which may be addressed, if the mechanisms underlying psychostimulant action are understood. Cocaine acts as a blocker at the transporters for dopamine (DAT), serotonin (SERT), and norepinephrine (NET), but amphetamines are substrates that do not only block the uptake of monoamines but also induce substrate efflux by promoting reverse transport. Reverse transport has been a focus of research for decades but its mechanistic basis still remains enigmatic. Recently, transporter-interacting proteins were found to regulate amphetamine-triggered reverse transport: calmodulin kinase IIα (αCaMKII) is a prominent example, because it binds the carboxyl terminus of DAT, phosphorylates its amino terminus, and supports amphetamine-induced substrate efflux in vitro. Here, we investigated whether, in vivo, the action of amphetamine was contingent on the presence of αCaMKII by recording the behavioral and neurochemical effects of amphetamine. Measurement of dopamine efflux in the dorsal striatum by microdialysis revealed that amphetamine induced less dopamine efflux in mice lacking αCaMKII. Consistent with this observation, the acute locomotor responses to amphetamine were also significantly blunted in αCaMKII-deficient mice. In addition, while the rewarding properties of amphetamine were preserved in αCaMKII-deficient mice, their behavioral sensitization to amphetamine was markedly reduced. Our findings demonstrate that amphetamine requires the presence of αCaMKII to elicit a full-fledged effect on DAT in vivo: αCaMKII does not only support acute amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux but is also important in shaping the chronic response to amphetamine.
Amphetamines constitute a class of psychostimulants that share a phenylethylamine
core structure. They are used illicitly for recreational purposes, but also used
clinically for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and
narcolepsy (Kristensen ; Steinkellner ). The stimulant and
addictive properties of amphetamines are thought to arise primarily from their
interaction with the cocaine-sensitive dopamine transporter (DAT) (Sulzer, 2011). DAT is a member of the solute carrier 6 gene
family of Na+/Cl−-dependent neurotransmitter
transporters; these transporters terminate neurotransmission by clearing the synapse
of their cognate substrate(s) (Kristensen ). Amphetamines are substrates of DAT and compete for reuptake with
dopamine (Sitte ). In addition,
amphetamines can induce transport reversal leading to transporter-mediated efflux of
dopamine (Sulzer, 2011; Sitte and
Freissmuth, 2010). Both, competition for uptake and reverse transport
lead to a pronounced increase in the extracellular concentrations of dopamine. The
resulting increased dopaminergic input in the striatum has been associated with the
rewarding properties of amphetamines (Schultz, 2002).
Accordingly, repeated amphetamine-induced enhancement of synaptic dopamine can
promote the development of drug addiction via the induction of long-term changes
leading to synaptic plasticity (Nestler, 2005;
Sulzer, 2011). In addition, the adaptive changes
have been implicated in the emergence of stimulant-induced psychosis and
schizophrenia (Snyder, 1974; Yui
).The molecular mechanism of amphetamine-induced DAT-mediated reverse transport is
still a matter of debate (Sulzer, 2011; Sitte and Freissmuth, 2010). Reverse transport is thought to
involve the uptake of amphetamines via the transporter and their passive diffusion
through the membrane which is due to their lipophilic nature (Sitte ; Sandtner ). Besides, the weak-base hypothesis states that
amphetamines are trapped within synaptic vesicles in the presynaptic specialization
and deplete the vesicular stores of dopamine by dissipating the proton gradient that
provides the driving force for the vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs). Thereby,
amphetamines elevate the cytosolic dopamine concentration and render dopamine
available for reverse transport by DAT (Sulzer, 2011).
Additionally, amphetamine is a substrate for VMATs and thereby competitively inhibits
vesicular dopamine uptake. The resulting elevation of dopamine in the cytosol
provides another explanation for how dopamine can efflux via DAT (Sulzer, 2011).Undoubtedly, ion gradients are the most crucial factor in determining whether
transporter reversal can occur, because the substrate-binding sites are only
accessible in the presence of high Na+ concentrations (Sitte and Freissmuth, 2010). A crucial factor for
amphetamine-induced reverse transport of DAT is its contingency on the intracellular
sodium concentration (Khoshbouei ). However, the last years also revealed an intricate contribution of
both, the membrane environment and interacting proteins (Fog
; Steinkellner ; Pizzo , 2014; Buchmayer
) in the modulation of amphetamine-triggered
reverse transport. Previous observations also indicated that dopamine efflux was
regulated by cytosolic Ca2+ (Gnegy ). Because of its abundance in neurons,
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIα
(αCaMKII) was the candidate target of Ca2+. This
was subsequently verified: αCaMKII was shown to modulate reverse
transport of dopamine by binding to the carboxyl terminus of DAT and to phosphorylate
serines at its amino terminus (Fog ). In vitro, inhibition of αCaMKII and its
genetic ablation attenuated the amphetamine-induced substrate efflux via DAT
(Fog ; Steinkellner ; Rickhag ). These results supported the hypothesis that
αCaMKII regulated the action of amphetamine on DAT.The amphetamine-induced behavioral effects result from the complex interplay of at
least three target areas, which are innervated by dopaminergic projection neurons.
These include the prefrontal cortex, where dopamine impinges on executive function,
the nucleus accumbens, in which dopamine encodes rewarding cues and incentive
salience, and the corpus striatum, where dopamine controls locomotion. Dopaminergic
projections in the brain express DAT at different levels. It is therefore not clear
whether components of the amphetamine-induced behavioral response differ in their
dependence on αCaMKII.We addressed this question by exploring the action of amphetamine in vivo in
αCaMKII-deficient mice. We found that the absence of
αCaMKII blunted both the amphetamine-induced increase in locomotion
and the sensitization after repeated administration of amphetamine. Surprisingly, the
rewarding action of amphetamine was preserved in αCaMKII-deficient
mice. These findings demonstrate that, in vivo, some—but not
all—actions of amphetamine are contingent on functional
αCaMKII.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents
D-amphetamine, cocaine, GBR12909, cis-(Z)-flupenthixol, haloperidol, ketanserin,
3-hydroxybenzylhydrazine (ND1015), reserpine, and the
anti-α-Tubulin antibody were purchased from Sigma Aldrich;
[3H]dopamine (40 Ci/mmol),
[3H]SCH23390 (70 Ci/mmol), and
[3H]raclopride (60 Ci/mmol) were obtained from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Anti-tyrosine hydroxylase and anti-VMAT2 antibodies
were purchased from Merck Millipore. Anti-PSD-95 and anti-DARPP32 antibodies were
from BD Transduction Laboratories. Anti-βCaMKII antibody was from
Life Technologies. Anti-PKC antibody was obtained from Signalway Antibody LLC.
Anti-phospho Akt Thr-308, anti-phospho DARPP32 Thr-34, anti-phospho ERK1/2
(p44/42) Thr-202/Tyr-204, anti-total Akt, and anti-total ERK1/2
antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.
Animals
The generation of αCaMKII-KO mice has been described elsewhere
(Elgersma ). All mice were
bred on a C57Bl/6J background and were housed under standard laboratory
conditions (12-h light/12-h dark cycle). Food and water were provided ad
libitum. Male mice were tested at 12–20 weeks of age. All experiments were
conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of
the Medical University of Vienna and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and
Research (license BMWF·66.009/0250-II/3b/2013).
Synaptosomal and Vesicular [3H]Dopamine Uptake and
Radioligand Binding
Uptake of [3H]dopamine via DAT was measured in striatal
synaptosomes as described (Steinkellner ). Vesicular uptake was performed in striatal synaptic vesicles.
Briefly, lysate pellet 2 (LP2) was isolated as described by Hell and Jahn (1994) and resuspended in uptake buffer (150 mM
N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG), 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM
ATP-Mg2+, 2 mM KCl, and 10 mM
K+-gluconate, pH=7.4). To measure transport,
approximately 20–30 μg of vesicles were preincubated in uptake
buffer for 10 min at 30 °C before the addition of 40 nM
[3H]dopamine and incubation for another 10 min at
30 °C. Non-specific uptake was done in the presence of 10 μM
reserpine. Uptake was terminated by the addition of ice-cold uptake buffer
(2 mM ATP-Mg2+ was substituted by 2 mM
MgSO4) and filtration using GF/B filters presoaked in 2%
polyethylenimine.Binding of [3H]SCH23390 and
[3H]raclopride was performed as described (Ghisi ). Briefly, striatal
synaptosomes (Steinkellner )
were resuspended in binding buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 120 mM NaCl,
5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2,
pH=7.4). Ketanserin (100 nM) was added to the incubation to prevent
binding of [3H]SCH23390 to 5HT2A receptors.
Increasing concentrations of [3H]SCH23390 or
[3H]raclopride were added; the reaction was incubated for
1 h at 25 °C. Non-specific binding was determined in the
presence of 10 μM cis-(Z)-flupenthixol and 50 μM
haloperidol for [3H]SCH23390 and
[3H]raclopride binding, respectively. Binding was stopped by
adding ice-cold binding buffer and filtered onto GF/B filters presoaked in
2% polyethylenimine using an automated cell harvester filtration device
(Skatron Instruments AS). The radioactivity bound to the filters was measured by
liquid scintillation counting.
Immunoblots
Mice were killed by cervical dislocation, decapitated, and heads were immediately
immersed in liquid nitrogen for 6 s. Striata were dissected and snap-frozen
in liquid nitrogen. Tissue was homogenized in RIPA buffer containing (50 mM
Tris.HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100,
0.1% SDS, and 1% deoxycholate supplemented with protease and
phosphatase inhibitors) and incubated at 4 °C for 60 min
followed by centrifugation at 12 600 g for 30 min.
For phospho-protein analysis, tissue was boiled for 10 min in 1% SDS
supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Proteins were
separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose
before incubation with primary antibodies overnight. IRDye 680- or 800-RD-labeled
secondary antibodies were obtained from LI-COR and visualized using the LI-COR
Odyssey CLx infrared imaging system. Densitometric quantification of bands was
performed using NIH ImageJ software.
Behavioral Pharmacology
Horizontal locomotion (total distance traveled) was measured in
‘open-field' (OF) square boxes (36 × 36 × 45 cm)
using a video camera mounted above the box and analyzed using the Anymaze software
from Stoelting (V.4.7). Distances traveled were recorded for 60 min. Acute
drug effects were assessed by administering an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of
saline to the mice on day zero (d0); their locomotion was measured for
60 min. On the next day (d1), mice were administered D-amphetamine (2 or
5 mg/kg) by i.p. injection. Distances traveled were again recorded for
60 min. Acute drug effects were normalized to the distances traveled upon
injection of saline and expressed as fold increase in locomotion.
D-amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization
Baseline locomotor activity of mice was assessed on day zero (d0) after
injection of saline (i.p.). Mice were then sensitized to D-amphetamine
(2 mg/kg) by daily (i.p.) injections for 6 consecutive days
(d1–d6). After each injection, locomotor activity was recorded in the OF
boxes for 60 min. After 6 days of drug sensitization, amphetamine was
withheld for 14 days. Mice were challenged by injection of D-amphetamine
(2 mg/kg, i.p.) on day 20 (d20) after which they were again
monitored in the OF boxes.
Conditioned place preference
Conditioned place preference (CPP) was conducted in commercially available CPP
chambers (MED Associates, Georgia, VT, USA) using the protocol described in
Ramsey . The apparatus
used consisted of two chambers with distinguishable floor (grid floor
vs rod floor). Experiments consisted of preconditioning,
conditioning, and test phases. During preconditioning (d0) mice had free access
to both chambers for 30 min; the time spent in both chambers was
recorded. On the next day (d1), mice were injected i.p. with D-amphetamine
(2 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg) or cocaine (20 mg/kg) and
put into the less-preferred chamber for 30 min. On the following day
(d2), saline was injected and mice were put into the other chamber for
30 min. This procedure was repeated two more times with alternating drug
(d3, d5) and saline (d4, d6) injections. On the last day (d7), mice were put
into the apparatus and allowed to access both chambers to test for conditioned
place preference. The time spent in each chamber was recorded for
30 min.
In Vivo Microdialysis
Mice were anaesthetized using ketamine (100 mg/kg)/xylazine
(10 mg/kg) and placed into a stereotactic frame (Stoelting). Concentric
microdialysis probes (2-mm membrane length; cutoff 6000 Da; CMA-11,
CMA/Microdialysis, Solna, Sweden) were inserted into the right dorsal striatum
using the following coordinates (in mm) according to Franklin
and Paxinos (2008): anterior-posterior: 0.0; lateral: −2.5;
dorso–ventral: 4.4. A screw was inserted into the left hemisphere to
stabilize subsequent fixation with dental cement. Twenty-four hours after surgery,
freely moving animals were connected to a syringe pump and perfused with
artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF: 147 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl,
1.2 mM CaCl2, 0.85 mM MgCl2;
CMA/Microdialysis, Solna, Sweden). After a washout for 1 h, four 90-min
fractions were collected in a low-perfusion mode (0.1 μl/min) in
tubes containing 2 μl of 0.5 M perchloric acid to estimate the
extracellular dopamine concentrations in the striatum (Gainetdinov ).Twenty-four hours after the low-perfusion mode, mice were again connected to the
pump and perfusion was performed using ‘conventional microdialysis'
(1 μl/min) to measure the effect of D-amphetamine on DAT-mediated
dopamine efflux in freely moving animals (Gainetdinov ). After a 30-min washout, 6 × 20-min baseline
fractions were collected. After that, mice were injected with saline and 6 ×
20-min fractions were collected. Finally, mice were injected with
5 mg/kg D-amphetamine and 6 × 20-min fractions were collected.
All these samples were collected in tubes containing 2 μl of 1 M
perchloric acidAll dialysis samples were analyzed using reversed-phase high-performance liquid
chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC–EC) to measure the
levels of dopamine and its metabolites.
Neurochemical Measurement of Monoamine Tissue Levels
Striata were dissected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For L-DOPA measurements,
mice were injected with 100 mg/kg (i.p.) of 3-hydroxybenzylhydrazine
(ND1015) 1 h before killing. Tissue was homogenized in 40 volumes of
0.1 M HClO4, the homogenate was centrifuged at
10 000 g for 10 min and supernatants were
filtered through 0.22 μm filters (Millipore Ultrafree-MC centrifugal
filter units, 0.22 μm).
Analytical procedure
Measurements of dopamine and metabolites in collected microdialysis and tissue
samples were performed by HPLC with electrochemical detection (ALEXYS LC-EC
system, Antec Leyden BV, the Netherlands) equipped with a reverse-phase column
(3 μm particles, ALB-215 C18, 1 × 150 mm, Antec) at a
flow rate of 200 μl/min and electrochemically detected by a
0.7-mm glass carbon electrode (Antec; VT-03). The mobile phase contained
50 mM H3PO4, 50 mM citric acid, 8 mM
KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 400 mg/l octanesulfonic acid sodium salt,
and 10% (vol/vol) methanol, pH 3.9. The sensitivity of the method
permitted detection of ∼3 fmol dopamine. All samples
(11 μl) were injected into HPLC without any additional
purification.
Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry (FSCV)
Briefly, mice were anaesthetized with halothane and decapitated. The brain was
sectioned in cold carboxygenated aCSF on a VT1000S vibrating microtome (Leica
Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany) at a thickness of 300 μm. Coronal
slices containing the dorsal striatum were allowed to recover for at least
1 h at room temperature in carboxygenated aCSF. For recordings, slices were
superfused with 32 °C carboxygenated aCSF at a flow rate of
1 ml/min. Experimental recordings started 20 min after transfer
to the slice chamber. Carbon fiber electrodes (5 μm; Goodfellow,
Huntingdon, England) were made as previously described (Kuhr
and Wightman, 1986). The electrodes were inserted
∼100 μm into the dorsal striatal brain slice. The potential of the
working electrode was held at −0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl between
scan and was ramped to +1.3 V at 300 V/s and back at
−0.4 V every 100 ms via an A-M system isolated pulse
stimulator (Sequim, WA, USA). The triangular waveform was computer-controlled
using HEKA EVA8 potensiostat (HEKA Elektronik Dr Schulze GmbH, Germany) and a ESA
bioscience FSCV interface analog to digital converter) via TH-1 software (ESA
biosciences, MA, USA). Axonal dopamine release in the dorsolateral striatum was
evoked using a twisted bipolar-stimulating electrode (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA,
USA). Stimulations were delivered every 2 min by a single electrical pulse
(1 ms, 400 μs). Background-subtracted cyclic voltammograms were
obtained by subtracting the current obtained before the stimulation from all
recordings. The peak oxidation current for dopamine in each voltammogram was
converted into a measure of the dopamine concentration by postcalibration of the
electrode using 1 μM dopamine (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Data were
normalized to the first five recordings (10 min) of their respective
control period and graphically plotted against time (means±SEM). We
reported in Figure 3b the dopamine concentration measured and we used normalized
current in all the other graphs.
Statistics
The statistical significance of differences was evaluated using one-way ANOVA
followed by Tukey's post hoc test or Student's
t-test where appropriate. Data are shown as mean±SEM.
RESULTS
αCaMKII-KO Mice Still Develop Conditioned Place Preference
for Amphetamine
In its multimeric arrangement, individual αCaMKII moieties
phosphorylate adjacent monomers and thus store information that encodes the
magnitude of a preceding calcium signal. Accordingly, αCaMKII
supports long-term potentiation and thus the initial steps required in the
formation of some types of memory (Silva ). The intra-hippocampal injection of the CaMKII-inhibitor KN-93
impairs conditioned place preference (CPP) for D-amphetamine in rats (Tan, 2002). We therefore anticipated that CPP would be
abrogated in αCaMKII-deficient mice. However, this was not the
case. Regardless of whether D-amphetamine was administered at a dose of
2 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg, αCaMKII-deficient mice
did not significantly differ from wild-type mice in their ability to recall the
spatial memory associated with drug administration (Figure 1a
and b). As a control, we determined CPP upon administration of the
DAT-inhibitor cocaine (20 mg/kg): the rewarding properties of cocaine
were similar in magnitude in wild type and αCaMKII-KO mice (Figure 1c). Taken together, these data show that
αCaMKII is not required for the rewarding effect of amphetamine
and cocaine as measured by CPP.
Figure 1
Conditioned place preference for 2 mg/kg (a) and 5 mg/kg (b)
D-amphetamine and 20 mg/kg cocaine (c); (stimulants were administered
in the less-preferred chamber): data are expressed as the time spent in the
drug-associated compartment before (pretest) and after (test) D-amphetamine or
cocaine treatment. D-amphetamine (2 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) and
cocaine induced significant place preference in both, wild type (WT) and knockout
(KO) mice (paired two-tailed Student's t-test, p<0.01).
Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant
treatment × genotype effects (p<0.05). (a) WT
n=7, KO n=13, (b) WT n=10, KO
n=10, (c) WT n=7, KO n=5.
αCaMKII-KO Mice Display Increased Locomotor Activity and have
Elevated Extracellular Dopamine Concentrations
A null mutation of unc-43, the Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of
αCaMKII, causes hyperactivity in the nematode (Reiner ). Hence, we recorded the
baseline locomotor activities of αCaMKII-KO and wild-type mice to
assess whether motor activity was affected by the loss of αCaMKII.
Within the 1-h observation period in the OF, αCaMKII-KO mice
covered a roughly threefold longer distance than wild-type mice (Figure 2a). Mice deficient in DAT (DAT-KO) have increased
basal extracellular dopamine levels and are hyperactive (Giros ; Jones ). Accordingly, we also monitored locomotion of
DAT-KO mice in the OF to gauge the magnitude of the effect seen in
αCaMKII-KO mice. This control experiment indicated that the
hyperactivity seen in αCaMKII-KO mice is approximately threefold
less pronounced than that of DAT-KO mice (DAT-KO: 503±71 m,
n=5; p<0.0001). The hyperactivity of DAT-KO mice is
accounted for by elevated extracellular dopamine levels (Giros ). Hence, we measured striatal
extracellular dopamine levels in αCaMKII-KO mice. Baseline
extracellular dopamine concentrations are at low nanomolar range, but can be
measured reliably by microdialysis employing a quantitative low-perfusion rate
microdialysis (0.1 μl/min). Our results showed that basal dopamine
levels were approximately twofold higher in the dorsal striatum of
αCaMKII-KO mice compared with wild-type littermates (Figure 2b). In addition, the total tissue content of
striatal dopamine was significantly increased in αCaMKII-KO mice
(Figure 2c) without concomitant changes in the
dopamine metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid (data
not shown). At the same time, the dopamine turnover (DOPAC/dopamine ratio) was
not altered (data not shown).
Figure 2
(a) Locomotor activity of wild type (WT) and knockout (KO) mice; horizontal
distances were measured for 60 min in an open field: WT:
44.0±8.3 m, n=13; αCaMKII-KO:
150.6±15.1 m, n=12 (unpaired two-tailed
Student's t-test; ***p<0.0001). (b)
Extracellular dopamine levels in WT and αCaMKII-KO mice: Dopamine
concentrations in the right dorsal striatum were collected by quantitative
low-perfusion microdialysis and analyzed by HPLC–EC. WT:
11.54±2.31 nM, n=7; αCaMKII-KO:
20.15±2.92 nM, n=10, unpaired Student's
t-test; *p<0.05). (c) Tissue levels of dopamine:
freshly dissected dorsal striata were homogenized and extracted before measurement
by HPLC (n=14 per genotype; unpaired Student's
t-test; *p<0.05). (d) Densitometric analysis of western
blots show no change in striatal TH expression between WT and KO animals; TH bands
were normalized to tubulin; n=7; Student's t-test,
p>0.05.
The difference in dopamine levels may arise from a change in the dopamine
synthesis rate in αCaMKII-KO mice. Accordingly, we blocked the
second step in dopamine biosynthesis by pre-treating mice with
3-hydroxybenzylhydrazine (ND1015, 100 mg/kg i.p.), an inhibitor of
L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase, which readily permeates the blood-brain
barrier. After 1 h, mice were killed, striata were harvested, and the
levels of the dopamine precursor L-DOPA were determined as an index of the
dopamine synthesis rate. L-DOPA levels were not significantly different between
genotypes (αCaMKII-KO: 1.57±0.14 ng/mg, WT:
1.24±0.14 ng/mg; n=7; p=0.1264).
In addition, we quantified the expression level of tyrosine hydroxylase by
immunoblotting and found that the striata of wild type and
αCaMKII-KO mice contained comparable amounts of the enzyme (Figure 2d).In conclusion, our results indicate that the absence of αCaMKII was
associated with increased extracellular and total levels of dopamine and
pronounced hyperactivity.
Vesicular Dopamine Release is Increased in αCaMKII-KO
Mice
An increase in extracellular dopamine can be accounted for by at least two
mechanisms, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive: (i) a decrease in
dopamine reuptake and/or (ii) increased vesicular release of dopamine. We
previously showed that the uptake rate of the DAT substrate
[3H]1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium
([3H]MPP+) was unchanged in striatal
synaptosomes of αCaMKII-KO mice (Steinkellner
).
[3H]MPP+ was used because it is more
stable than dopamine and does not diffuse through the membrane. We ruled out
subtle changes in handling different substrates by also carrying out uptake
experiments in striatal synaptosomes of αCaMKII-KO and wild-type
mice using [3H]dopamine; the observations confirmed that
uptake of the endogenous substrate was similar with respect to both, the maximal
velocity of uptake (Vmax) and the apparent affinity for
dopamine (Km) (Figure 3a). In line
with unchanged dopamine uptake kinetics, we previously showed that DAT surface
expression was not altered in the striatum of αCaMKII-KO mice
(Steinkellner ). Hence,
reduced dopamine uptake is unlikely to account for higher basal levels of dopamine
in αCaMKII-KO mice.
Figure 3
(a) [3H]dopamine uptake kinetics in striatal synaptosomes of
wild type (WT) and knockout (KO) animals: striatal synaptosomes were incubated
with 0.1 μM [3H]dopamine and increasing
concentrations of unlabeled dopamine (0–3 μM) for 5 min at
37 °C. Non-specific uptake was determined in the presence of
1 μM GBR12909. Kd and Bmax
values are not significantly different (Km: WT:
88.3±30.7 nM, αCaMKII-KO:
111.2±47.1 nM; Vmax: WT:
4.66±0.32 pmol/mg protein/min, αCaMKII-KO:
4.87±0.45 pmol/mg protein/min; WT n=6, KO
n=5; p>0.05). (b) Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry
(FSCV) was used to measure dopamine release from striatal brain slices.
Representative traces in control and KO animal exemplify the higher peak height in
mutants compared with control. (c) Average of stimulated dopamine release in
dorsal striatum of control and KO animals show an increased evoked dopamine
release in KO animals (n=6; *p<0.05, unpaired
Student's t-test). (d) Densitometric analysis of VMAT2 protein
levels in the striatum of WT and KO mice: bands were normalized to tubulin;
n=9–10; Student's t-test,
p>0.05 (e) Uptake of [3H]dopamine in striatal
synaptic vesicles: vesicles were incubated with 40 nM
[3H]dopamine for 10 min at 30 °C.
Non-specific uptake was determined in the presence of 10 μM reserpine;
n=3; p>0.05 (f) Dopamine D1 receptor
levels as assessed by [3H]SCH23390 binding: WT
Bmax=326.6±33.2 fmol/mg protein,
KO Bmax=287.1±32.9 fmol/mg protein,
Kd: WT
Kd=1.55±0.76 nM, KO
Kd=1.50±0.81 nM; WT
n=4, KO n=5). (g) Dopamine D2 receptor
levels as assessed by [3H]raclopride: WT
Bmax=280.2±30.0 fmol/mg protein,
n=6; KO
Bmax=229.0±19.7 fmol/mg protein,
n=5; WT
Kd=7.18±2.15 nM, KO
Kd=2.55±0.84 nM.
Kd and Bmax values are not
significantly different; Student's t-test, p>0.05. (h)
Densitometric analysis of PSD-95 protein levels in the striatum of WT and KO mice:
bands were normalized to tubulin; n=7; Student's
t-test, p>0.05.
We also explored the alternative explanation, namely that vesicular release of
dopamine was altered: striatal slices were prepared from αCaMKII-KO
and wild-type mice subjected to a single electrical pulse of 400 μA and
1 ms duration. This manipulation induces dopamine release from vesicles of
the readily releasable pool at the active zone of dopaminergic terminals. Dopamine
released in response to the electrical pulse was measured by fast-scan cyclic
voltammetry. The signals recorded in slices from αCaMKII-KO mice
were consistently larger than that observed in those of wild-type mice, indicating
that vesicular dopamine release was enhanced in αCaMKII-KO (Figure 3b and c).The increase in vesicular dopamine release does not seem to be contingent on
increased VMAT2 levels or elevated vesicular dopamine uptake: we measured both,
total VMAT2 protein levels in the striatum and reserpine-sensitive dopamine uptake
in purified striatal synaptic vesicles. Our results indicated that neither the
VMAT2 total protein amount nor the vesicular uptake rate of
[3H]dopamine was significantly altered between wild type and
αCaMKII-KO animals (Figure 3d and
e).
Dopamine Receptors, Dopamine Signaling, and PSD-95 Protein Levels in
αCaMKII-KO Mice
The findings summarized in Figures 2 and 3
per se suffice to account for the hyperactive phenotype of
αCaMKII-KO mice, because (i) the increased dopamine tissue
levels translate into (ii) enhanced vesicular dopamine release and thus drive
locomotion. Elevated extracellular dopamine levels affect dopamine
receptor-mediated signaling in DAT-KO mice. Therefore, we also examined the
postsynaptic targets of dopamine in the striatum of
αCaMKII-deficient mice, ie, dopamine D1 and
D2 receptors as well as three prototypic dopamine-related signaling
pathways (DARPP32, Akt, and ERK1/2; all of which are altered in DAT-KO mice).
Furthermore, we examined the scaffolding protein PSD95 (postsynaptic density
protein of 95 kD) which plays a key role in organizing signaling molecules
on the postsynaptic membrane. Dopamine D1 and D2 receptor
expression levels were quantified by binding of [3H]SCH23390
and [3H]raclopride to striatal membranes, respectively
(Figure 3f and g). In contrast to what could have
been expected with regard to the hyperdopaminergic DAT-KO mice, we did not observe
any significant differences in the number of D1 and D2
receptors in striatal membranes of αCaMKII-KO and wild-type mice
(Figure 3d and e). In line with the
radioligand-binding results, we also found that there were no significant changes
in pDARPP32, pAkt, pERK1, or pERK2 levels as measured by immunoblotting
(pDARPP32/DARPP32 ratio: αCaMKII-KO: 1.23±0.24, WT:
1.50±0.26; n=3; p=0.4856; pAkt/Akt
ratio: αCaMKII-KO: 1.43±0.11, WT: 1.20±0.12;
n=6–7; p=0.1875; pERK1/ERK1 ratio:
αCaMKII-KO: 0.73±0.07, WT: 0.88±0.04;
n=6; p=0.1015; pERK2/ERK2 ratio:
αCaMKII-KO: 0.70±0.14, WT: 0.97±0.02;
n=6; p=0.0877; Student's
t-test).Persistent elevations of extracellular dopamine (ie, as a result of exposing mice
to cocaine or of ablating DAT) can also result in downregulation of striatal
levels of PSD95 (Yao ).
Accordingly, we examined whether PSD95 was downregulated in
αCaMKII-KO mice. However, quantitative immunoblotting for PSD95
from striatal extracts of WT and αCaMKII-KO mice did not reveal any
differences between genotypes (Figure 3h).
Amphetamine-Induced Dopamine Efflux in αCaMKII-KO
Mice
We previously reported that amphetamine-induced DAT-mediated substrate efflux was
markedly attenuated in striatal synaptosomes and slices of
αCaMKII-KO mice compared with wild-type littermate controls
(Steinkellner ). The
decrease in substrate efflux is a functional consequence of ablated
αCaMKII function rather than a result of a reduction of DAT
surface expression (Steinkellner ). We examined whether reverse transport by DAT was also blunted
in vivo by implanting microdialysis probes into the dorsal striatum of
these animals. This allowed to measure dopamine efflux after D-amphetamine
administration (5 mg/kg, i.p.) to freely moving animals. These
experiments confirmed that, in agreement with our previous ex vivo
measurements, dopamine efflux was substantially decreased in
αCaMKII-KO mice (Figure 4a). The fact
that efflux was not completely abolished might be a result of other kinases
involved in the modulation of reverse transport or compensatory changes during
development, as the αCaMKII-KO mice used in the experiments are
global knockout mice. Hence, we also assessed whether the second most common
CaMKII isoform, βCaMKII, was altered and might be able to compensate
for the loss of αCaMKII. In fact, we previously reported that
βCaMKII is part of the interactome of DAT (Steinkellner ) and have now found that
βCaMKII was upregulated in the striatum (Figure 4b). However, the presence of βCaMKII does not
suffice to rescue the reduction in amphetamine-triggered efflux, as the global
CaMKII-inhibitor KN-93 had no appreciable effect on amphetamine-triggered efflux
in αCaMKII-KO mice as described in Steinkellner . Additionally, we measured
whether there were any changes in PKC, which is another Ca2+
sensitive protein kinase and has also been shown to modulate DAT-reverse
transport. However, we did not observe any changes in PKC protein levels in the
striatum of wild type and αCaMKII-KO mice (Figure 4c).
Figure 4
(a) D-amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the dorsal striatum of wild type
(WT) and knockout (KO) animals in vivo: Microdialysis probes were
inserted into the right dorsal striatum of WT and KO mice. Mice were allowed to
recover for 24 h from the surgery before measurement of baseline dopamine
concentrations. The day after, mice were injected with D-amphetamine
(5 mg/kg i.p.) and dopamine dialysates were collected for 2 h.
Amphetamine-induced dopamine release was normalized to baseline dopamine levels
(see Figure 2 legend) and is presented as percentage
of basal level. (b) Densitometric analysis of βCaMKII protein levels
in the striatum of WT and KO mice: bands were normalized to tubulin;
n=7; Student's t-test, *p<0.05. (c)
Densitometric analysis of PKC protein levels in the striatum of WT and KO mice:
bands were normalized to tubulin; n=9; Student's
t-test, p>0.05
Amphetamine-Induced Locomotor Activity is Decreased in
αCaMKII-KO Mice
Taken together, the findings suggested a cause-and-effect relation between the
increase in steady-state extracellular dopamine levels, which were seen in the
striata of αCaMKII-KO mice, and their increased locomotor activity.
However, the amphetamine-induced rise in extracellular dopamine was blunted in
these animals (Figure 4). It was therefore of interest
to examine how αCaMKII-KO mice responded to an amphetamine
challenge. We injected mice with D-amphetamine and measured the distances traveled
within 60 min in the OF (Figure 5a). When
administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg, D-amphetamine induced a comparable
increase in locomotor activity in wild type and αCaMKII-KO mice
(left hand set of bars in Figure 5a). When the dose of
D-amphetamine was increased to 5 mg/kg, locomotion was substantially
increased in wild-type mice. In contrast, there was no appreciable additional
effect in the αCaMKII-KO mice (Figure
5a, right hand sets of bars). These observations are consistent with
the conclusion that αCaMKII-dependent modulation of DAT is required
to support the full-fledged acute behavioral effects of amphetamine.
Figure 5
(a) Acute locomotor responses to D-amphetamine: mice were habituated to the open
field for 60 min one day before they received an injection of D-amphetamine
and subsequent recording of distances for another 60 min. Total distances
traveled after D-amphetamine were normalized to baseline locomotion and are
expressed as fold increase in locomotion. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test was used for statistical
analysis; ***p<0.0001. (b) D-amphetamine sensitization:
mice were habituated to open field chambers on day 0. On days 1–6, mice were
injected with 2 mg/kg D-amphetamine once daily and distances traveled
were recorded immediately after injection for 60 min. Mice were withdrawn
from D-amphetamine for 14 days before they received an additional drug injection
on day 20. The distances traveled are normalized to the first day (d1) of drug
treatment; repeated measures two-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of
genotype and treatment; *p<0.05,
***p<0.0001. (c) Densitometric analysis of pCREB levels in
the striatum of untreated wild type (WT) and knockout (KO) mice: bands were
normalized to total CREB; n= 6–8; Student's
t-test, p>0.05. (d) Densitometric analysis of pCREB protein
levels in the striatum of amphetamine-sensitized or saline-pretreated WT and KO
mice: bands were normalized to total CREB; n=3–4; one-way
ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test was used for statistical
analysis; ***p<0.0001.
Amphetamine Sensitization is Blunted in αCaMKII-KO
Mice
The amphetamine-induced locomotor response is subject to sensitization, ie,
repeated administration of amphetamine (or other psychostimulants including
cocaine) results in an increase in the response (Steketee and
Kalivas, 2011). This sensitization represents a long-lasting
adaptation to the psychostimulant action and is triggered by the sequential
activation of transcriptional programs (Nestler,
2005). We examined whether the blunted action of amphetamine sufficed
to support the emergence of behavioral sensitization in the absence of
αCaMKII: mice were injected once daily with 2 mg/kg
D-amphetamine for six consecutive days, followed by a withdrawal period of 14 days
and a challenge injection of 2 mg/kg D-amphetamine on day 21. This dose
was chosen because wild type and αCaMKII-deficient mice did not
differ in their acute response (Figure 5a). Behavioral
sensitization readily developed in wild-type mice as is evident from the
continuous increase in locomotor activity in the first 6 days of amphetamine
treatment and the roughly fivefold increase in distance covered within
60 min upon rechallenge on day 21 (open bars in Figure
5b). In contrast, compared with the first day of treatment,
αCaMKII-KO mice did not respond with any further increase in
locomotor activity from day 4 on, when they had covered approximately twice the
distance traveled on the first day of D-amphetamine treatment (closed bars in
Figure 5b). In order to address a possible
mechanistic basis for the impaired sensitization observed in the mutant mice, we
investigated the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein
(CREB), which is known to be induced after chronic exposure to addictive drugs and
serves as a αCaMKII substrate (Nestler,
2005). Untreated αCaMKII-KO or wild-type mice did not
differ in their basal amounts of phospho-CREB (pCREB) levels in the striatum
(Figure 5c). However, we found that amphetamine
sensitization did not induce an increase in pCREB levels in
αCaMKII-KO, whereas it induced a significant increase in the WT
(Figure 5d).
DISCUSSION
The current experiments demonstrate that the full-fledged effect of amphetamine
in vivo is contingent on the presence of αCaMKII. This was
predicted from our earlier experiments that had been conducted in vitro
(Steinkellner ). However,
dopaminergic neurons project to three major brain areas (ie, the nucleus accumbens in
the ventral striatum, the dorsal striatum, and the prefrontal cortex) that contribute
to a different extent to the acute biological response, to the emergence of addiction
and to psychotic symptoms resulting from long-term abuse. They also differ in the
level of DAT expression. Accordingly, the present experiments were designed to
explore which effect of amphetamine was most dependent on the presence of
αCaMKII. Clearly, the absence of αCaMKII did not
uniformly impair the responses elicited by amphetamine in vivo. It was, for
instance, surprising to see that the rewarding properties of amphetamine requiring
effective memory-related processes were not affected to any appreciable extent.
Similarly, we found that cocaine still induced robust place preference in
αCaMKII-KO animals. In contrast, the absence of
αCaMKII resulted in a substantial suppression of behavioral
sensitization to amphetamine. While some of these differences can be rationalized in
hindsight, it is evident that this was not to be predicted a priori.On a global level, αCaMKII has been implicated in synaptic plasticity
(Colbran and Brown, 2004). This is, in part,
accounted for by its role in shaping glutamatergic synapses in the brain (Baucum ). Moreover, the establishment of
addictive behavior has been hypothesized to depend in part on the activity of
αCaMKII in both, animal models and people (Li
). This conjecture is based on observations with
several drugs of abuse such as cocaine (Pierce ; Licata ;
Anderson ), alcohol (Easton ), or opioids (Lou ). We used conditioned place
preference (CPP) as a test to measure the addictive and rewarding potential of
amphetamine and cocaine. Our findings show that the rewarding properties of
amphetamine and cocaine were still preserved in αCaMKII-KO mice. This
is in contrast to previous findings in rats, where intra-hippocampal injection of the
CaMKII-blocker KN-93-attenuated amphetamine-induced CPP (Tan,
2002). However, it should be pointed out that CPP does not represent the
most reliable measurement of rewarding and addictive properties of a drug.
Furthermore, this discrepancy may reflect species differences or indicate that KN-93
inhibits ion channels and kinases other than αCaMKII. Irrespective of
this unresolved issue, our observations support the conclusion that the interaction
of αCaMKII and DAT does not play any major role in the rewarding
properties of amphetamine (and cocaine). It should be noted that amphetamine (and
cocaine) still demonstrate significant CPP in mice lacking the DAT (Budygin ) and even cocaine
self-administration (Rocha ).
However, a different strain of DAT-KO mice clearly failed to acquire cocaine
self-administration (Thomsen ).
Additionally, in mice with a cocaine-insensitive DAT, cocaine reward is lost
(Chen ). These observations
indicate that DAT-related processes still seem to be most essential for the rewarding
properties of these drugs. Potential compensatory and developmental changes in
knockout mice have to be considered and certainly preclude definite conclusions.
Besides, it has to be emphasized that CPP measures reward differently compared with
self-administration: while CPP primarily measures the reinforcing effects of drugs,
self-administration allows to discriminate between the reinforcing effects of a
substance and the motivation to consume it. Hence, we cannot rule out that
αCaMKII-KO mice would respond differently to amphetamine or cocaine
self-administration. Regardless, small increases in psychostimulant-induced dopamine
release might suffice to reach the threshold level required for the induction of
reward-related behavior as measured by CPP. In fact, αCaMKII-KO mice
still display dopamine efflux in response to amphetamine albeit significantly reduced
compared with wild-type mice: we measured amphetamine-induced DAT-mediated dopamine
efflux in the dorsal striatum by microdialysis and found that the amphetamine-induced
dopamine efflux was significantly decreased in αCaMKII-KO animals.
This is in accordance with our previous in vitro and ex vivo
findings (Fog ; Steinkellner ).Surprisingly, microdialysis also revealed that the extracellular dopamine
concentrations are approximately twofold increased in the striatum of
αCaMKII-KO mice and that these increased dopamine levels are the
result of an elevated vesicular dopamine release without concomitant alterations in
striatal VMAT2 protein levels or reserpine-sensitive VMAT2-mediated dopamine uptake
into vesicles. The increase in vesicular dopamine release appears counterintuitive
given that αCaMKII is the synapsin I-kinase, which defines the
relative size of the reserve pool of neurotransmitters (Greengard ). However, αCaMKII has
also been shown to act as a bidirectional modulator in neurotransmitter release: it
can both increase or decrease vesicular release (Chapman ). In addition, the genetic ablation of
αCaMKII in CA3 hippocampal neurons enhances stimulus-dependent
vesicular glutamate release at the synaptic contact of their Schaffer collaterals
with CA1 pyramidal neurons (Hinds ). Thus, it was proposed that—apart from its role in mobilizing
synaptic vesicles tethered to the cytoskeleton—αCaMKII can also
have a nonenzymatic role and regulate the size of the readily releasable pool of
vesicles at the active zone (Hojjati ). In this model, αCaMKII limits this readily
releasable pool; therefore its absence causes an increase in the number of vesicles
at the active zone of αCaMKII-KO mice (Hojjati
). The increased vesicular dopamine release that
we observed in αCaMKII-KO mice is hence consistent with this expanded
model of the role of αCaMKII in the presynaptic specialization.
Besides, it is also in line with the finding that mesolimbic dopamine release is
increased in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome, where αCaMKII is
hyperphosphorylated and thereby rendered inactive (Riday ).The increased synaptic dopamine levels of αCaMKII-KO mice were
accompanied by a profound hyperactivity. A similar result was obtained in C.
elegans, where a null mutation of unc-43, a homolog of
αCaMKII, caused hypermotility in the nematode (Reiner ).If αCaMKII-modulation of DAT were also important for the behavioral
response to amphetamine, αCaMKII-KO animals ought to display a
significantly reduced locomotor stimulation to an acute D-amphetamine injection. This
prediction was verified: D-amphetamine (5 mg/kg) stimulated locomotion of
wild-type mice by almost sixfold. In contrast, locomotion of
αCaMKII-KO animals only doubled in response to amphetamine, consistent
with the finding that amphetamine was still able to induce DAT-mediated dopamine
efflux albeit to a much lesser extent than in wild-type mice. The difference in the
locomotor response of αCaMKII-KO and wild-type mice provides
incontrovertible evidence that αCaMKII is a modulator of DAT-reverse
transport: αCaMKII favors a conformation of the transporter that is
willing to efflux (Robertson ).
This conclusion is also supported by recently published analogous observations made
in Drosophila melanogaster (Pizzo ).Repeated administration of amphetamine results in behavioral sensitization of
locomotor responses in rodents (Steketee and Kalivas,
2011). Sensitization is also important for the emergence of addiction to
psychostimulants; the underlying reprogramming of synaptic connections is
orchestrated by the sequential activation of transcription factors, which creates a
long-lasting memory of repeated drug exposure (Nestler,
2005). Our observations show that, in the absence of
αCaMKII, sensitization to amphetamine is substantially impaired. This
may arise from the reduced ability of amphetamine to cause dopamine release in mice
lacking αCaMKII and to thus trigger a sustained neuronal activation,
which eventually results in long-lasting synaptic facilitation. Presumably, the lack
of αCaMKII limits the increase in dopamine release with repeated
exposure, after a point, and therefore accounts for the reduced sensitization.Additionally, the absence of αCaMKII may impair the emergence of a
sensitized state, because αCaMKII is required for the full-fledged
activation of the transcriptional program required for memory formation. The latter
is supported by the finding that αCaMKII-KO mice displayed no increase
in pCREB levels after amphetamine sensitization, whereas wild-type mice showed a
significant increase in pCREB levels. At the present stage, it is impossible to
differentiate between these two possibilities, but most likely a combination of both,
a decreased dopamine efflux in response to amphetamine and an impaired
αCaMKII-mediated signaling, contribute to the effects observed
during amphetamine sensitization in αCaMKII-deficient mice.Regardless of the underlying mechanism, these experiments further highlight the
importance of αCaMKII in supporting the actions of amphetamine in
vivo. Our experiments also underline that the relative contribution of
αCaMKII to the behavioral actions of amphetamines might depend on
the expression levels of DAT. They seem to be more pronounced in the striatum, where
DAT expression levels are higher than in the nucleus accumbens, where DAT expression
levels are low. Experiments looking more carefully into regional and molecular
differences between the DAT/CaMKII interaction in those regions are currently
being explored in our laboratories.In spite of this inherent limitation of our approach, it is attractive to speculate
that subtle variations in the relative expression levels of DAT and of
αCaMKII may contribute to inter-individual differences in the
susceptibility to amphetamine addiction.
FUNDING AND DISCLOSURE
This research was supported by the Austrian Research Fund/FWF grants F3506, W1232
to HHS and F3510 to MF. HHS has received honoraria for lectures and consulting from
Astra Zeneca, Lundbeck, Nycomed, Ratiopharm, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Serumwerk
Bernburg, Torrex-Chiesi Pharma. MF has received honoraria for lectures and consulting
from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Astropharma, Baxter, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene,
Lundbeck, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Ratiopharm and the Association of
Austrian Sickness Funds. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Authors: Jacob U Fog; Habibeh Khoshbouei; Marion Holy; William A Owens; Christian Bjerggaard Vaegter; Namita Sen; Yelyzaveta Nikandrova; Erica Bowton; Douglas G McMahon; Roger J Colbran; Lynette C Daws; Harald H Sitte; Jonathan A Javitch; Aurelio Galli; Ulrik Gether Journal: Neuron Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Margaret E Gnegy; Habibeh Khoshbouei; Kelly A Berg; Jonathan A Javitch; William P Clarke; Minjia Zhang; Aurelio Galli Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Wei-Dong Yao; Raul R Gainetdinov; Margaret I Arbuckle; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Michel Cyr; Jean-Martin Beaulieu; Gonzalo E Torres; Seth G N Grant; Marc G Caron Journal: Neuron Date: 2004-02-19 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: A B Pizzo; C S Karam; Y Zhang; H Yano; R J Freyberg; D S Karam; Z Freyberg; A Yamamoto; B D McCabe; J A Javitch Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Joshua D Gross; Shane W Kaski; Adam B Schroer; Kimberley A Wix; David P Siderovski; Vincent Setola Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Jean-François De Backer; Stéphanie Monlezun; Bérangère Detraux; Adeline Gazan; Laura Vanopdenbosch; Julian Cheron; Giuseppe Cannazza; Sébastien Valverde; Lídia Cantacorps; Mérie Nassar; Laurent Venance; Olga Valverde; Philippe Faure; Michele Zoli; Olivier De Backer; David Gall; Serge N Schiffmann; Alban de Kerchove d'Exaerde Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 8.807