| Literature DB >> 24871260 |
Slavomír Perečinský1, Lenka Murínová2, Ivan Engler3, Viliam Donič4, Pavol Murín5, Marek Varga6, Lubomír Legáth7.
Abstract
A major symptom of hand-arm vibration syndrome is a secondary Raynaud's phenomenon-vibration white finger (VWF)-which results from a vasospasm of the digital arteries caused by work with vibration devices leading to occupational disease. Pharmacotherapy of VWF is often ineffective or has adverse effects. The aim of this work was to verify the influence of inhalation of partially ionized oxygen (O2•-) on peripheral blood vessels in the hands of patients with VWF. Ninety one (91)patients with VWF underwent four-finger adsorption plethysmography, and the pulse wave amplitude was recorded expressed in numeric parameters-called the native record. Next, a cold water test was conducted following with second plethysmography. The patients were divided in to the three groups. First and second inhaled 20-min of ionized oxygen O2•- or oxygen O2 respectively. Thirth group was control without treatment. All three groups a follow-up third plethysmography-the post-therapy record. Changes in the pulse wave amplitudes were evaluated. Inpatients group inhaling O2•- a modest increase of pulse wave amplitude was observed compared to the native record; patients inhaling medical oxygen O2 and the control showed a undesirable decline of pulse wave amplitude in VWF fingers. Strong vasodilatation were more frequent in the group inhaling O2•- compare to O2 (p < 0.05). Peripheral vasodilatation achieved by inhalation of O2•- could be used for VWF treatment without undesirable side effect in hospital as well as at home environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24871260 PMCID: PMC4078543 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110605698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of the three groups.
| Group | Number of Patients | Average Age | Average Number of Disintegrations | Number of Fingers with VWF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. O2•− | 26 | 51.04 (±7.07) | 2.78 (±2.30) | 64 |
| 2. O2 | 27 | 54.65 (±8.28) | 2.82 (±2.06) | 65 |
| 3. Control | 38 | 53.03 (±8.64) | 2.96 (±2.37) | 89 |
Differences between the VWF amplitude of the pulse wave measured after 10 min cooling following by 20 min of O2•− or O2 respectively inhalation (except control) and native record.
| Group | Difference in the Amplitude of the Pulse Wave |
|---|---|
| 1. O2•− | +0.68% (±51.39) |
| 2. O2 | −20.54% (±44.36) |
| 3. Control | −24.44% (±50.79) |
Figure 1Present three categories fingers with VWS showing the respond to inhalation of O2•− or O2 compared to control: (1) category “no vasodilatation”; (2) “vasodilatation”; (3) “strong vasodilatation”. The column expresses a number of measurements (it means number of fingers with desintegration of pulse waves) in percentage on the basis of an increase in the amplitude of the pulse wave. It is a marker of dilatation effect on peripheral blood vessels on the fingers.