Martin P Poirier1, Daniel Gagnon, Brian J Friesen, Stephen G Hardcastle, Glen P Kenny. 1. 1School of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA; and 2CanmetMINING, Natural Resources Canada, Sudbury, Ontario, CANADA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify how much whole-body heat loss increases during heat acclimation and the decay in these improvements after heat acclimation. METHODS: Ten males underwent a 14-d heat acclimation protocol that consisted of 90 min of cycling in the heat (40°C, 20% relative humidity) at approximately 50% of maximum oxygen consumption. Before (day 0), during (day 7), and at the end (day 14) of the heat acclimation protocol as well as 7 and 14 d after heat acclimation (days 21 and 28), whole-body heat exchange (evaporative and dry) was measured using direct calorimetry during three bouts of 30-min exercise at 300 (Ex1), 350 (Ex2), and 400 W·m (Ex3), each separated by 10 and 20 min of recovery, respectively, at 35°C and 16% relative humidity. Concurrent measurements of metabolic heat production (indirect calorimetry) allowed for the direct calculation of change in body heat content (ΔHb). RESULTS: After accounting for an increase in net dry heat gain, increases in whole-body evaporative heat loss were evident for Ex2 and Ex3 on day 7 (Ex2, 4.9 ± 5.6%; Ex3, 9.0 ± 6.0%; both P ≤ 0.05) and all heat loads on day 14 (Ex1, 7.6 ± 8.3%; Ex2, 7.7 ± 5.5%; Ex3, 11.2 ± 4.6%; all P ≤ 0.05) relative to day 0 (Ex1, 494 ± 27 W; Ex2, 583 ± 21 W; Ex3, 622 ± 36 W). As a result, a lower cumulative ΔHb was measured on day 7 (-18 ± 8%, P ≤ 0.001) and day 14 (-26 ± 10%, P ≤ 0.001) compared with that measured on day 0 (1062 ± 123 kJ). Most of these improvements were retained after 2 wk of nonexposure to the heat. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify how much 14 d of heat acclimation can increase whole-body evaporative heat loss, which can improve by as much as approximately 11%.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify how much whole-body heat loss increases during heat acclimation and the decay in these improvements after heat acclimation. METHODS: Ten males underwent a 14-d heat acclimation protocol that consisted of 90 min of cycling in the heat (40°C, 20% relative humidity) at approximately 50% of maximum oxygen consumption. Before (day 0), during (day 7), and at the end (day 14) of the heat acclimation protocol as well as 7 and 14 d after heat acclimation (days 21 and 28), whole-body heat exchange (evaporative and dry) was measured using direct calorimetry during three bouts of 30-min exercise at 300 (Ex1), 350 (Ex2), and 400 W·m (Ex3), each separated by 10 and 20 min of recovery, respectively, at 35°C and 16% relative humidity. Concurrent measurements of metabolic heat production (indirect calorimetry) allowed for the direct calculation of change in body heat content (ΔHb). RESULTS: After accounting for an increase in net dry heat gain, increases in whole-body evaporative heat loss were evident for Ex2 and Ex3 on day 7 (Ex2, 4.9 ± 5.6%; Ex3, 9.0 ± 6.0%; both P ≤ 0.05) and all heat loads on day 14 (Ex1, 7.6 ± 8.3%; Ex2, 7.7 ± 5.5%; Ex3, 11.2 ± 4.6%; all P ≤ 0.05) relative to day 0 (Ex1, 494 ± 27 W; Ex2, 583 ± 21 W; Ex3, 622 ± 36 W). As a result, a lower cumulative ΔHb was measured on day 7 (-18 ± 8%, P ≤ 0.001) and day 14 (-26 ± 10%, P ≤ 0.001) compared with that measured on day 0 (1062 ± 123 kJ). Most of these improvements were retained after 2 wk of nonexposure to the heat. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify how much 14 d of heat acclimation can increase whole-body evaporative heat loss, which can improve by as much as approximately 11%.
Authors: James Pearson; Matthew S Ganio; Zachary J Schlader; Rebekah A I Lucas; Daniel Gagnon; Eric Rivas; Scott L Davis; Karen J Kowalske; Craig G Crandall Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2017 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Zachary J Schlader; Matthew S Ganio; James Pearson; Rebekah A I Lucas; Daniel Gagnon; Eric Rivas; Karen J Kowalske; Craig G Crandall Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-04-30
Authors: Andreas D Flouris; Martin P Poirier; Andrea Bravi; Heather E Wright-Beatty; Christophe Herry; Andrew J Seely; Glen P Kenny Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Hui C Choo; Jeremiah J Peiffer; Joel W J Pang; Frankie H Y Tan; Abdul Rashid Aziz; Mohammed Ihsan; Jason K W Lee; Chris R Abbiss Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Sean R Notley; Martin P Poirier; Ronald J Sigal; Andrew D'Souza; Andreas D Flouris; Naoto Fujii; Glen P Kenny Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ignacio Bartolomé; Jesús Siquier-Coll; Mario Pérez-Quintero; María Concepción Robles-Gil; Diego Muñoz; Marcos Maynar-Mariño Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390