| Literature DB >> 24869941 |
Miguel Hie1, Julie Gay2, Lionel Galicier3, François Provôt4, Claire Presne5, Pascale Poullin6, Guy Bonmarchand7, Alain Wynckel8, Ygal Benhamou9, Philippe Vanhille10, Aude Servais11, Dominique Bordessoule12, Jean-Philippe Coindre13, Mohamed Hamidou14, Jean-Paul Vernant15, Agnès Veyradier16, Paul Coppo17.
Abstract
In acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), the persistence of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (<10%) during remission is associated with more relapse. Preemptive (ie, after remission) administration of rituximab in these patients to prevent relapses remains controversial. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 12-year follow-up data to compare the relapse incidence with or without preemptive rituximab infusion. Among 48 patients who experienced at least one episode of acquired TTP followed by severe ADAMTS13 deficiency during remission, 30 received preemptive rituximab (group 1); the other 18 did not (group 2). After a median of 17 months (interquartile range [IQR], 11-29) following rituximab, the relapse incidence decreased from 0.57 episodes/year (IQR, 0.46-0.7) to 0 episodes/year (IQR, 0-0.81) (P < .01) in group 1. ADAMTS13 activity 3 months after the first rituximab infusion increased to 46% (IQR, 30%-68%). Nine patients required additional courses of rituximab. In 5 patients, ADAMTS13 activity failed to increase durably. Four patients experienced manageable adverse effects. In group 2, the relapse incidence was higher (0.5 relapses/year; IQR, 0.12-0.5; P < .01). Relapse-free survival was longer in group 1 (P = .049). A persistent severe ADAMTS13 deficiency during TTP remission should prompt consideration of preemptive rituximab to prevent relapses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24869941 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-550244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113