Literature DB >> 24869930

Prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Cinzia Pellegrini1, Lisa Argnani1, Alessandro Broccoli1, Vittorio Stefoni1, Enrico Derenzini1, Letizia Gandolfi1, Beatrice Casadei1, Roberto Maglie1, Stefano Pileri1, Pier Luigi Zinzani2.   

Abstract

The definition of the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) is still under investigation. The purpose of the present observational retrospective study was to assess the early prognostic value of PET after the first three cycles of therapy (PET+3), evaluating visual data in de novo PTCL patients treated in first line with standard chemotherapy and followed by both PET and computed tomography scan. Of 27 PET+3-negative patients, 19 also had a negative PET at the end of treatment (PET+6), whereas 8 of 27 had a positive final one; 6 of 7 PET+3-positive patients had a positive PET+6, whereas only 1 patient had a negative PET+6. Estimated overall survival plotted according to PET+3 results showed 78.6% for negative patients and 21.4% for positive patients at 88.7 months with a significant difference. Patients with negative PET+3 had superior progression-free survival of 72.6% compared with 16.7% of PET+3-positive patients. At the time of this analysis, 17 of 19 (89.5%) patients with negative PET+3 are in continuous complete response (CCR) and only 1 of 7 (14.2%) patients with positive PET+3 is still in CCR. In conclusion, our results indicate that positive PET+3 is predictive of a worse outcome in PTCL, and this significant statistical difference between the two curves could be clinically informative. Larger and prospective studies and harmonization of PET reading criteria are needed. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete response; Computed tomography scan; Peripheral T-cell lymphoma; Positron emission tomography; Progression-free survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24869930      PMCID: PMC4077444          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  22 in total

1.  PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT.

Authors:  Beatriz Rodríguez-Vigil; Nieves Gómez-León; Inmaculada Pinilla; Dolores Hernández-Maraver; Juan Coya; Luis Martín-Curto; Rosario Madero
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  18F-FDG PET versus CT for the detection of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in refractory celiac disease.

Authors:  Muhammed Hadithi; Maarten Mallant; Joost Oudejans; Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe; Chris J Mulder; Emile F I Comans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Classification.

Authors:  P P Carbone; H S Kaplan; K Musshoff; D W Smithers; M Tubiana
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma. A bicenter trial.

Authors:  I Buchmann; M Reinhardt; K Elsner; D Bunjes; C Altehoefer; J Finke; E Moser; G Glatting; J Kotzerke; C A Guhlmann; H Schirrmeister; S N Reske
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin's disease patients.

Authors:  P L Zinzani; M Tani; S Fanti; L Alinari; G Musuraca; E Marchi; V Stefoni; P Castellucci; M Fina; M Farshad; S Pileri; M Baccarani
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  [Comparison of findings with 18-FDG PET and CT in pretherapeutic staging of malignant lymphoma].

Authors:  R Thill; J Neuerburg; U Fabry; U Cremerius; G Wagenknecht; D Hellwig; R Osieka; R Günther; U Büll
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.379

8.  Imaging of lymphoma with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: correlation with CT.

Authors:  J S Newman; I R Francis; M S Kaminski; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and prognosis of T cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Carla Casulo; Heiko Schöder; John Feeney; Remy Lim; Jocelyn Maragulia; Andrew D Zelenetz; Steven Horwitz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-03-04

10.  Whole-body 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  G Jerusalem; V Warland; F Najjar; P Paulus; M F Fassotte; G Fillet; P Rigo
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.690

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Baseline and interim functional imaging with PET effectively risk stratifies patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Neha Mehta-Shah; Kimiteru Ito; Kurt Bantilan; Alison J Moskowitz; Craig Sauter; Steven M Horwitz; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-01-22

3.  Prognostic significance of FDG-PET/CT in determining upfront autologous stem cell transplantation for the treatment of peripheral T cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Seo-Yeon Ahn; Seung-Yeon Jung; Sung-Hoon Jung; Jae-Sook Ahn; Je-Jung Lee; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Sae-Ryung Kang; Yeon-Hee Han; Jae-Yong Kwak; Ho-Young Yhim; Deok-Hwan Yang
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 4.  Peripheral T-cell lymphoma - are we making progress?

Authors:  Niloufer Khan; Neval Ozkaya; Alison Moskowitz; Ahmet Dogan; Steven Horwitz
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  What's new in peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Stefano Luminari; Tetiana Skrypets
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.271

6.  Prognostic significance of interim PET/CT based on visual, SUV-based, and MTV-based assessment in the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Jae-Sook Ahn; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; Sun-Seog Kweon; Jung-Joon Min; Hee-Seung Bom; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Yee Soo Chae; Joon Ho Moon; Sang Kyun Sohn; Sang Woo Lee; Byung Hyun Byun; Young Rok Do; Je-Jung Lee; Deok-Hwan Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The prognostic value of interim and end-of-treatment PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  J S Ham; S J Kim; J Y Choi; S H Hyun; S-K Choi; H S Kim; S H Lim; J Y Lee; S-H Jung; Y H Ko; W S Kim
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 8.  FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; Regine Kluge
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  How to Sequence Therapies in Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kitsada Wudhikarn; N Nora Bennani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.