Literature DB >> 24869608

Minimally displaced clavicle fracture after high-energy injury: are they likely to displace?

John T Riehl1, Bill J Athans2, Mark W Munro2, Joshua R Langford2, Stanley J Kupiszewski2, George J Haidukewych2, Kenneth J Koval2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nondisplaced or minimally displaced clavicle fractures are often considered to be benign injuries. These fractures in the trauma patient population, however, may deserve closer follow-up than their low-energy counterparts. We sought to determine the initial assessment performed on these patients and the rate of subsequent fracture displacement in patients sustaining high-energy trauma when a supine chest radiograph on initial trauma survey revealed a well-aligned clavicle fracture.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of trauma alert patients who sustained a midshaft clavicle fracture (AO/OTA type 15-B) with less than 100% displacement treated at a single level 1 trauma centre between 2005 and 2010. We compared fracture displacement on initial supine chest radiographs and follow-up radiographs. Orthopedic consultation and the type of imaging studies obtained were also recorded.
RESULTS: Ninety-five patients with clavicle fractures met the inclusion criteria. On follow-up, 57 (60.0%) had displacement of 100% or more of the shaft width. Most patients (63.2%) in our study had an orthopedic consultation during their hospital admission, and 27.4% had clavicle radiographs taken on the day of admission.
CONCLUSION: Clavicle fractures in patients with a high-energy mechanism of injury are prone to fracture displacement, even when initial supine chest radiographs show nondisplacement. We recommend clavicle films as part of the initial evaluation for all patients with clavicle fractures and early follow-up within the first 2 weeks of injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24869608      PMCID: PMC4035398          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

1.  Nonunion of the clavicle.

Authors:  C S NEER
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1960-03-05

2.  Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results.

Authors:  J M Hill; M H McGuire; L A Crosby
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-07

3.  Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Missed clavicular fracture; inadequate radiograph or occult fracture?

Authors:  D Alao; H R Guly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture.

Authors:  C Michael Robinson; Charles M Court-Brown; Margaret M McQueen; Alison E Wakefield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive implantation of a novel flexible intramedullary nail in patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  M Calbiyik; S Zehir; D Ipek
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Influence of surgical stabilization of clavicle fractures in multiply-injured patients with thoracic trauma.

Authors:  Helge Eberbach; Rolf Lefering; Sven Hager; Klaus Schumm; Lisa Bode; Martin Jaeger; Dirk Maier; Johannes Kalbhenn; Thorsten Hammer; Hagen Schmal; Jörg Bayer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.