| Literature DB >> 24868156 |
Mi-Yeul Hyun1, Young-Eun Jung2, Moon-Doo Kim2, Young-Sook Kwak2, Sung-Chul Hong3, Won-Myong Bahk4, Bo-Hyun Yoon5, Hye Won Yoon6, Bora Yoo6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Body image incorporates cognitive and affective components as well as behaviors related to own body perception. This study evaluated the occurrence of body image distortion and its correlates in Korean adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Korean adolescent; body image distortion; high risk for eating disorders
Year: 2014 PMID: 24868156 PMCID: PMC4027816 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S63143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ISSN: 1176-6328 Impact factor: 2.570
Characteristics of the subject by sex
| Boys (n=1,285) | Girls (n=832) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 0.080 | ||
| 13–14 | 896 (69.7%) | 550 (66.1%) | |
| 15–16 | 389 (30.3%) | 282 (33.9%) | |
| Family structure | 0.573 | ||
| Living with both parents | 1,111 (87.1%) | 713 (86.2%) | |
| Living with one parents | 165 (12.9%) | 114 (13.8%) | |
| Paternal education | 0.941 | ||
| >12 y | 683 (63.7%) | 464 (63.8%) | |
| ≤12 y | 390 (36.3%) | 263 (36.2%) | |
| Maternal education | 0.456 | ||
| >12 y | 549 (51.1%) | 389 (52.9%) | |
| ≤12 y | 526 (48.9%) | 347 (47.1%) | |
| Current weight status | 0.180 | ||
| Normal weight | 1,044 (81.2%) | 697 (83.8%) | |
| Underweight | 47 (3.7%) | 31 (3.7%) | |
| Overweight | 134 (10.4%) | 63 (7.6%) | |
| Obese | 60 (4.7%) | 41 (4.9%) | |
| Body dissatisfaction | <0.001 | ||
| Low | 317 (24.8%) | 83 (10.0%) | |
| Moderate | 535 (41.9%) | 287 (34.6%) | |
| Extreme | 425 (33.3%) | 459 (55.4%) | |
| Somatotype drawings | |||
| No of current body shape | 4.2±1.5 | 4.4±1.3 | 0.006 |
| No of ideal body shape | 4.1±0.9 | 3.5±0.8 | <0.001 |
Notes:
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
Statistically significant.
Subjects were requested to nominate the current and ideal body shape from a series of somatotype drawings, which ranged from extremely thin (1) to obese (9).
Abbreviation: y, years.
Comparisons of characteristics between subjects with and without body image distortion
| Body image distortion
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n=1,087) | No (n=1,030) | ||
| Age, y | 0.028 | ||
| 13–14 | 719 (66.1%) | 727 (70.6%) | |
| 15–16 | 368 (33.9%) | 303 (29.4%) | |
| Sex | <0.001 | ||
| Boys | 711 (65.4%) | 574 (55.7%) | |
| Girls | 376 (34.6%) | 456 (44.3%) | |
| Family structure | 0.829 | ||
| Living with both parents | 941 (86.9%) | 883 (86.6%) | |
| Living with one parents | 142 (13.1%) | 137 (13.4%) | |
| Paternal education | 0.166 | ||
| >12 y | 615 (65.2%) | 532 (62.1%) | |
| ≤12 y | 328 (34.8%) | 325 (37.9%) | |
| Maternal education | 0.636 | ||
| >12 y | 495 (52.3%) | 443 (51.2%) | |
| ≤12 y | 451 (47.7%) | 422 (48.8%) | |
| Current weight status | <0.001 | ||
| Normal weight | 769 (70.7%) | 972 (94.4%) | |
| Underweight | 39 (3.6%) | 39 (3.8%) | |
| Overweight | 190 (17.5%) | 7 (0.7%) | |
| Obese | 89 (8.2%) | 12 (1.2%) | |
| Body dissatisfaction | 0.018 | ||
| Low | 185 (17.1%) | 215 (21.0%) | |
| Moderate | 414 (38.3%) | 408 (39.8%) | |
| Extreme | 482 (44.6%) | 402 (39.2%) | |
| High risk for eating disorders | 0.002 | ||
| Yes | 75 (6.9%) | 40 (3.9%) | |
| No | 1,012 (93.1%) | 990 (96.1%) | |
| Depression | 0.527 | ||
| Yes | 325 (29.9%) | 321 (31.2%) | |
| No | 762 (70.1%) | 709 (68.8%) | |
Notes:
Values are presented as number (%).
Statistically significant.
Abbreviation: y, years.
Factors associated with body image distortion
| Variables | Controls versus subjects with body image distortion
| |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% Cl) | ||
| Age, y (ref: 13–14) | ||
| 15–16 | 1.31 (1.02–1.54) | 0.031 |
| Sex (ref: female) | ||
| Male | 1.55 (1.28–1.89) | <0.001 |
| Current weight status (ref: normal weight) | ||
| Underweight | 1.25 (0.79–1.98) | 0.337 |
| Overweight | 33.27 (15.52–71.35) | <0.001 |
| Obese | 9.37 (5.06–17.34) | <0.001 |
| Body dissatisfaction (ref: low) | ||
| Moderate | 1.14 (0.89–1.48) | 0.301 |
| Extreme | 1.16 (0.89–1.52) | 0.277 |
| High risk for eating disorders (ref: no) | ||
| Yes | 1.69 (1.11–2.58) | 0.015 |
Notes:
The ORs were calculated using binary logistic regression analysis and adjusted for sex and age.
Statistically significant.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; y, years; ref, reference.