Danelle F James1, Lillian Werner1, Jennifer R Brown1, William G Wierda1, Jacqueline C Barrientos1, Januario E Castro1, Andrew Greaves1, Amy J Johnson1, Laura Z Rassenti1, Kanti R Rai1, Donna Neuberg1, Thomas J Kipps2. 1. Danelle F. James, Januario E. Castro, Andrew Greaves, Laura Z. Rassenti, Thomas J. Kipps, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Lillian Werner, Jennifer R. Brown, Donna Neuberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; William G. Wierda, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX; Jacqueline C. Barrientos, Kanti R. Rai, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, New Hyde Park, NY; Amy J. Johnson, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 2. Danelle F. James, Januario E. Castro, Andrew Greaves, Laura Z. Rassenti, Thomas J. Kipps, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Lillian Werner, Jennifer R. Brown, Donna Neuberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; William G. Wierda, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX; Jacqueline C. Barrientos, Kanti R. Rai, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, New Hyde Park, NY; Amy J. Johnson, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. tkipps@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with therapeutic activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In preclinical models, lenalidomide acted synergistically with rituximab. The CLL Research Consortium initiated a phase II study to evaluate this combination in treatment-naive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lenalidomide was initiated at 2.5 mg/day and was escalated based on treatment tolerability to a maximum of 10 mg/day, for 21 days/cycle, for a maximum of seven cycles. Rituximab was administered at the end of cycle 1 and was continued for seven cycles. Patients received allopurinol and aspirin for prophylaxis. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients enrolled onto one of two age-specific strata; patients' median age was 56 and 70 years for arms A and B, respectively. Patients in the older-patient stratum more frequently had elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin levels, high-risk Rai stage, and were less likely to complete the maximum planned therapy. Adverse events were similar in the two arms. Nonhematologic toxicity was predominantly at grade 1/2, and neutropenia was the most common hematologic adverse event. The response rate for arm A was 95%, with 20% complete responses (CRs) and 20% nodular partial responses. Of arm B patients, 78% achieved a response, of which 11% were CRs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months for the younger cohort and 20 months for the older cohort. CONCLUSION: Intrapatient dose-escalation was safe. The majority of patients reached the maximum lenalidomide dose and experienced a response to a defined seven-cycle course of lenalidomide and rituximab therapy. Despite differences in baseline characteristics and the response rate between the two strata, the PFS did not differ.
PURPOSE:Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with therapeutic activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In preclinical models, lenalidomide acted synergistically with rituximab. The CLL Research Consortium initiated a phase II study to evaluate this combination in treatment-naive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lenalidomide was initiated at 2.5 mg/day and was escalated based on treatment tolerability to a maximum of 10 mg/day, for 21 days/cycle, for a maximum of seven cycles. Rituximab was administered at the end of cycle 1 and was continued for seven cycles. Patients received allopurinol and aspirin for prophylaxis. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients enrolled onto one of two age-specific strata; patients' median age was 56 and 70 years for arms A and B, respectively. Patients in the older-patient stratum more frequently had elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin levels, high-risk Rai stage, and were less likely to complete the maximum planned therapy. Adverse events were similar in the two arms. Nonhematologic toxicity was predominantly at grade 1/2, and neutropenia was the most common hematologic adverse event. The response rate for arm A was 95%, with 20% complete responses (CRs) and 20% nodular partial responses. Of arm B patients, 78% achieved a response, of which 11% were CRs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months for the younger cohort and 20 months for the older cohort. CONCLUSION: Intrapatient dose-escalation was safe. The majority of patients reached the maximum lenalidomide dose and experienced a response to a defined seven-cycle course of lenalidomide and rituximab therapy. Despite differences in baseline characteristics and the response rate between the two strata, the PFS did not differ.
Authors: Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laure A Moutouh-de Parseval; Lilia Weiss; Robert J DeLap; Robert D Knight; Jerome B Zeldis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Asher Chanan-Khan; Kena C Miller; Laurie Musial; David Lawrence; Swaminathan Padmanabhan; Kenichi Takeshita; Carl W Porter; David W Goodrich; Zale P Bernstein; Paul Wallace; David Spaner; Alice Mohr; Catriona Byrne; Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Cynthia Chrystal; Petr Starostik; Myron S Czuczman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nishitha Reddy; Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; George Deeb; Mark Roth; Mary Vaughn; Joy Knight; Paul Wallace; Myron S Czuczman Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps Journal: Blood Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Leslie A Andritsos; Amy J Johnson; Gerard Lozanski; William Blum; Cheryl Kefauver; Farrukh Awan; Lisa L Smith; Rosa Lapalombella; Sarah E May; Chelsey A Raymond; Da-Sheng Wang; Robert D Knight; Amy S Ruppert; Amy Lehman; David Jarjoura; Ching-Shih Chen; John C Byrd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alessandra Ferrajoli; Bang-Ning Lee; Ellen J Schlette; Susan M O'Brien; Hui Gao; Sijin Wen; William G Wierda; Zeev Estrov; Stefan Faderl; Evan N Cohen; Changping Li; James M Reuben; Michael J Keating Journal: Blood Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A C Rawstron; N Villamor; M Ritgen; S Böttcher; P Ghia; J L Zehnder; G Lozanski; D Colomer; C Moreno; M Geuna; P A S Evans; Y Natkunam; S E Coutre; E D Avery; L Z Rassenti; T J Kipps; F Caligaris-Cappio; M Kneba; J C Byrd; M J Hallek; E Montserrat; P Hillmen Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Paolo Strati; Koichi Takahashi; Christine B Peterson; Michael J Keating; Philip A Thompson; Naval G Daver; Nitin Jain; Jan A Burger; Zeev Estrov; Susan M O'Brien; Hagop M Kantarjian; William G Wierda; P Andrew Futreal; Alessandra Ferrajoli Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-05-14
Authors: Thomas J Kipps; Freda K Stevenson; Catherine J Wu; Carlo M Croce; Graham Packham; William G Wierda; Susan O'Brien; John Gribben; Kanti Rai Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 52.329