Literature DB >> 24867831

Migraine in health workers: working in a hospital can be considered an advantage?

M Bartolini1, G Viticchi, L Falsetti, A Ulissi, M Baldassari, A Medori, S Mattioli, F Lombardi, L Provinciali, M Silvestrini.   

Abstract

Migraine is the most common form of headache, and is one of the most diffused pathologies in the world. Moreover, patients often lose years before obtaining a correct diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether diagnostic delay differs between hospital workers, in theory more sensible to health problems, and common people. We compared our cohort of patients attending the headache center on which we put a diagnosis of migraine with and without aura with a sample of hospital workers investigated about headache presence and characteristics. Particularly, hospital workers were evaluated by ID-migraine test, a three-question test validated to formulate a migraine diagnosis. Continuous variables (age and diagnostic delay) were compared with t test for independent samples. Dichotomous and categorical variables were compared with Chi squared test. The mean difference between in-hospital workers and outpatients was analyzed with a GLM/multivariate model accounting for age and sex. The difference between the single subcategory of workers affected by migraine was explored with a GLM/multivariate model accounting of age and sex. Five hundred and ninety-nine patients affected by migraine with and without aura were enrolled. Demographical characteristics were comparable in the two study populations. In-hospital workers (99 patients) had a mean longer diagnostic delay (14.89 years; 95 % CI: 7.85-21.93 years) with respect to the outpatients (12.13 years; 95 % CI: 5.37-18.89 years). The difference resulted statistically significant at the multivariate model (p < 0.05). Single subpopulations of in-hospital workers did not have a statistically significant different delay in diagnosing migraine. Diagnostic delay was significantly longer in hospital workers with respect to outpatients. Then, we can conclude that our population of hospital workers did not present a particular attention to their headache, probably because of a tendency to self-treating. Moreover, we did not find differences among different typology of workers, underlining that different job experience and education did not contribute to a best management of headache. More information and informative initiatives are necessary to sensitize people about migraine, especially among hospital workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24867831     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-014-1737-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  10 in total

1.  Instrumental exams performance can be a contributing factor to the delay in diagnosis of migraine.

Authors:  Giovanna Viticchi; Marco Bartolini; Lorenzo Falsetti; Jacopo Dolcini; Raffaella Cerqua; Simona Luzzi; Leandro Provinciali; Mauro Silvestrini
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version).

Authors: 
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of the ID Migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gráinne Cousins; Samira Hijazze; Floris A Van de Laar; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  The role of instrumental examinations in delayed migraine diagnosis.

Authors:  G Viticchi; M Silvestrini; L Falsetti; C Lanciotti; R Cerqua; S Luzzi; L Provinciali; M Bartolini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Time delay from onset to diagnosis of migraine.

Authors:  Giovanna Viticchi; Mauro Silvestrini; Lorenzo Falsetti; Chiara Lanciotti; Raffaella Cerqua; Simona Luzzi; Leandro Provinciali; Marco Bartolini
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 6.  Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project.

Authors:  Lars Jacob Stovner; Colette Andree
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 7.277

7.  Chronic daily headache with analgesic overuse: epidemiology and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  R Colás; P Muñoz; R Temprano; C Gómez; J Pascual
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Adherence to acute migraine medication: what does it mean, why does it matter?

Authors:  Bozena J Katić; Steven J Krause; Stewart J Tepper; Henry X Hu; Marcelo E Bigal
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.887

9.  Diagnostic delay in migraine with aura.

Authors:  G Viticchi; M Bartolini; L Falsetti; J Dolcini; S Luzzi; L Provinciali; M Silvestrini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  The experience of headaches in health care workers: opportunity for care improvement.

Authors:  Mary D Hughes; Jun Wu; Terry C Williams; Jeremy M Loberger; Matthew F Hudson; Joselyn R Burdine; Peggy J Wagner
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.887

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  O040. Migraineurs and self-consciousness of illness in a population of hospital workers.

Authors:  Giovanna Viticchi; Lorenzo Falsetti; Laura Buratti; Andrea Plutino; Leandro Provinciali; Mauro Silvestrini; Marco Bartolini
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.277

2.  Prevalence and risk factors associated with headache amongst medical staff in South China.

Authors:  Wei Xie; Ruibing Li; Mianwang He; Fang Cui; Tingting Sun; Jianmei Xiong; Dengfa Zhao; Weinan Na; Ruozhuo Liu; Shengyuan Yu
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 7.277

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.