Literature DB >> 24867716

Engineered nasal cartilage by cell homing: a model for augmentative and reconstructive rhinoplasty.

Avital Mendelson1, Jeffrey M Ahn, Kamila Paluch, Mildred C Embree, Jeremy J Mao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current augmentative and reconstructive rhinoplasties use auto logous tissue grafts or synthetic bioinert materials to repair nasal trauma or attain an aesthetic shape. Autologous grafts are associated with donor-site trauma and morbidity. Synthetic materials are widely used but often yield an unnatural appearance and are prone to infection or dislocation. There is an acute clinical need for the generation of native tissues to serve as rhinoplasty grafts without the undesirable features that are associated with autologous grafts or current synthetic materials.
METHODS: Bioactive scaffolds were developed that not only recruited cells in the nasal dorsum in vivo, but also induced chondrogenesis of the recruited cells. Bilayered scaffolds were fabricated with alginate-containing gelatin microspheres encapsulating cytokines atop a porous poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) base. Microspheres were fabricated to contain recombinant human transforming growth factor-β3 at doses of 200, 500, or 1000 ng, with phosphate-buffered saline-loaded microspheres used as a control. A rat model of augmentation rhinoplasty was created by implanting scaffolds atop the native nasal cartilage surface that was scored to induce cell migration. Tissue formation and chondrogenesis in the scaffolds were evaluated by image analysis and histologic staining with hematoxylin and eosin, toluidine blue, Verhoeff elastic-van Geison, and aggrecan immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Sustained release of increasing doses of transforming growth factor-β3 for up to the tested 10 weeks promoted orthotopic cartilage-like tissue formation in a dose-dependent manner.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings represent the first attempt to engineer cartilage tissue by cell homing for rhinoplasty, and could potentially serve as an alternative material for augmentative and reconstructive rhinoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24867716      PMCID: PMC4048865          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advanced Strategies for Tissue Engineering in Regenerative Medicine: A Biofabrication and Biopolymer Perspective.

Authors:  Courtney R Lynch; Pierre P D Kondiah; Yahya E Choonara
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 2.  Progress of 3D Printing Techniques for Nasal Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Yanyan Cao; Shengbo Sang; Yang An; Chuan Xiang; Yanping Li; Yonghuan Zhen
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Three-dimensional printing of a patient-specific engineered nasal cartilage for augmentative rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Hee-Gyeong Yi; Yeong-Jin Choi; Jin Woo Jung; Jinah Jang; Tae-Ha Song; Suhun Chae; Minjun Ahn; Tae Hyun Choi; Jong-Won Rhie; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 4.  Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application.

Authors:  Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 5.  Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.

Authors:  Weston L Niermeyer; Cole Rodman; Michael M Li; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-19

Review 6.  Administration of signalling molecules dictates stem cell homing for in situ regeneration.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Xiao-Tao He; Yuan Yin; Rui-Xin Wu; Bei-Min Tian; Fa-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.