Literature DB >> 24866921

Misleading first impressions: different for different facial images of the same person.

Alexander Todorov1, Jenny M Porter2.   

Abstract

Studies on first impressions from facial appearance have rapidly proliferated in the past decade. Almost all of these studies have relied on a single face image per target individual, and differences in impressions have been interpreted as originating in stable physiognomic differences between individuals. Here we show that images of the same individual can lead to different impressions, with within-individual image variance comparable to or exceeding between-individuals variance for a variety of social judgments (Experiment 1). We further show that preferences for images shift as a function of the context (e.g., selecting an image for online dating vs. a political campaign; Experiment 2), that preferences are predictably biased by the selection of the images (e.g., an image fitting a political campaign vs. a randomly selected image; Experiment 3), and that these biases are evident after extremely brief (40-ms) presentation of the images (Experiment 4). We discuss the implications of these findings for studies on the accuracy of first impressions.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face perception; social perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24866921     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614532474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  24 in total

1.  Facial appearance affects science communication.

Authors:  Ana I Gheorghiu; Mitchell J Callan; William J Skylark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images.

Authors:  Richard J W Vernon; Clare A M Sutherland; Andrew W Young; Tom Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perception of health from facial cues.

Authors:  Audrey J Henderson; Iris J Holzleitner; Sean N Talamas; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Formalizing emotion concepts within a Bayesian model of theory of mind.

Authors:  Rebecca Saxe; Sean Dae Houlihan
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  Set the tone: Trustworthy and dominant novel voices classification using explicit judgement and machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Cyrielle Chappuis; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth.

Authors:  William T L Cox; Patricia G Devine; Alyssa A Bischmann; Janet S Hyde
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-07-28

7.  Social Vision: Applying a Social-Functional Approach to Face and Expression Perception.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Daniel N Albohn; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14

8.  Social Trait Information in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Trained for Face Identification.

Authors:  Connor J Parde; Ying Hu; Carlos Castillo; Swami Sankaranarayanan; Alice J O'Toole
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-06

9.  Trait evaluations of faces and voices: Comparing within- and between-person variability.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Mila Mileva; A Mike Burton; Andrew W Young; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-03-18

10.  Within-person variability in men's facial width-to-height ratio.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.