Literature DB >> 24866419

Mining and biodiversity offsets: a transparent and science-based approach to measure "no-net-loss".

Malika Virah-Sawmy1, Johannes Ebeling2, Roslyn Taplin3.   

Abstract

Mining and associated infrastructure developments can present themselves as economic opportunities that are difficult to forego for developing and industrialised countries alike. Almost inevitably, however, they lead to biodiversity loss. This trade-off can be greatest in economically poor but highly biodiverse regions. Biodiversity offsets have, therefore, increasingly been promoted as a mechanism to help achieve both the aims of development and biodiversity conservation. Accordingly, this mechanism is emerging as a key tool for multinational mining companies to demonstrate good environmental stewardship. Relying on offsets to achieve "no-net-loss" of biodiversity, however, requires certainty in their ecological integrity where they are used to sanction habitat destruction. Here, we discuss real-world practices in biodiversity offsetting by assessing how well some leading initiatives internationally integrate critical aspects of biodiversity attributes, net loss accounting and project management. With the aim of improving, rather than merely critiquing the approach, we analyse different aspects of biodiversity offsetting. Further, we analyse the potential pitfalls of developing counterfactual scenarios of biodiversity loss or gains in a project's absence. In this, we draw on insights from experience with carbon offsetting. This informs our discussion of realistic projections of project effectiveness and permanence of benefits to ensure no net losses, and the risk of displacing, rather than avoiding biodiversity losses ("leakage"). We show that the most prominent existing biodiversity offset initiatives employ broad and somewhat arbitrary parameters to measure habitat value and do not sufficiently consider real-world challenges in compensating losses in an effective and lasting manner. We propose a more transparent and science-based approach, supported with a new formula, to help design biodiversity offsets to realise their potential in enabling more responsible mining that better balances economic development opportunities for mining and biodiversity conservation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity accounting; Biodiversity offsets; Carbon offsets; Corporate social responsibility; Environmental impact assessment; Responsible investment; Responsible mining

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24866419     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mining and biodiversity: key issues and research needs in conservation science.

Authors:  Laura J Sonter; Saleem H Ali; James E M Watson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ecological Equivalence Assessment Methods: What Trade-Offs between Operationality, Scientific Basis and Comprehensiveness?

Authors:  Lucie Bezombes; Stéphanie Gaucherand; Christian Kerbiriou; Marie-Eve Reinert; Thomas Spiegelberger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  FORUM: Indirect leakage leads to a failure of avoided loss biodiversity offsetting.

Authors:  Atte Moilanen; Jussi Laitila
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 6.528

Review 4.  When is an Offset Not an Offset? A Framework of Necessary Conditions for Biodiversity Offsets.

Authors:  Jenny Pope; Angus Morrison-Saunders; Alan Bond; Francois Retief
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.644

5.  Addressing Potential Cumulative Impacts of Development on Threatened Species: The Case of the Endangered Black-Throated Finch.

Authors:  Eric Peter Vanderduys; April E Reside; Anthony Grice; Juliana Rechetelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.