Literature DB >> 24866351

Maternal outcomes according to mode of delivery in women with severe preeclampsia: a cohort study.

Melania M R Amorim1, Leila Katz, Amanda S Barros, Tainara S F Almeida, Alex Sandro R Souza, Aníbal Faúndes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between mode of delivery and maternal complications in patients with severe preeclampsia.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 500 pregnant women with severe preeclampsia. The mode of delivery, vaginal or caesarean section, was considered the exposure, while the postpartum maternal complications and severe maternal morbidity were the outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the adjusted risk and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of maternal morbidity.
RESULTS: Labour was spontaneous in 22.0% and induced in 28.2%, while 49.8% had an elective caesarean section. Ninety-five (67.4%) of the patients in whom labour was induced delivered vaginally. Total Caesarean rate was 68.2%. The risk of severe maternal morbidity was significantly greater in patients submitted to Caesarean section (54.0% versus 32.7%) irrespective of the presence of labour. Factors that remained associated with severe maternal morbidity following multivariate analysis were a diagnosis of HELLP syndrome after delivery (OR = 3.73; 95% CI: 1.55-9.88) and having a caesarean (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.52-4.57).
CONCLUSIONS: Caesareans are often performed in patients with severe preeclampsia and are associated with significant postpartum maternal morbidity. Induction of labour should be considered a feasible option in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean; complications; delivery; labour; obstetrics; pre-eclampsia; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24866351     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.928689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  5 in total

1.  Influence of Preeclampsia on Induction of Labor at Term: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jutta Pretscher; Christel Weiss; Ulf Dammer; Florian Stumpfe; Florian Faschingbauer; Matthias W Beckmann; Sven Kehl
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Induction, labor length and mode of delivery: the impact on preeclampsia-related adverse maternal outcomes.

Authors:  L D Levine; M A Elovitz; M Limaye; M D Sammel; S K Srinivas
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Risk factors and outcome of patients with eclampsia at a tertiary hospital in Egypt.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahran; Hashem Fares; Reham Elkhateeb; Mahmoud Ibrahim; Haitham Bahaa; Ahmad Sanad; Alaa Gamal; Mohamed Zeeneldin; Eissa Khalifa; Ahmed Abdelghany
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.

Authors:  Dominiek Coates; Angela Makris; Christine Catling; Amanda Henry; Vanessa Scarf; Nicole Watts; Deborah Fox; Purshaiyna Thirukumar; Vincent Wong; Hamish Russell; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Modes and Timings of Delivery on Feto-Maternal Outcomes in Women with Severe Preeclampsia: A Multi-Center Survey in Mainland China.

Authors:  Shao-Wen Wu; Wei-Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.