Literature DB >> 24865628

Role of 3.0 T multiparametric MRI in local staging in prostate cancer and clinical implications for radiation oncology.

F Couñago1, M Recio, E Del Cerro, L Cerezo, A Díaz Gavela, F J Marcos, R Murillo, J M Rodriguez Luna, I J Thuissard, J L R Martin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (3TmMRI) for local staging of prostate cancer and its influence on the decision to change the clinical target volume (CTV), total dose and hormonal therapy when treating prostate cancer patients with radiotherapy.
METHODS: From 2009 to 2013, 150 patients, who had confirmed prostate cancer and underwent a 3TmMRI before treatment with radical prostatectomy or radical radiation therapy, were included. Radiation therapy treatment (CTV, total dose and hormonal therapy) was initially determined on the basis of the clinical information, and radiation therapy plan was reevaluated after 3TmMRI review. The value of preoperative 3TmMRI in local staging and in the decision of radiotherapy treatment according to NCCN risk classification was analyzed.
RESULTS: 3TmMRI performed correct, over- and under staging in 78.7 % (37/47), 6.3 % (3/47), 14.8 % patients (7/47), respectively. 3TmMRI identified 6 cT2a, 7 cT2b, 28 cT2c, 3 cT3a, 3 cT3b tumors. At final pathology, 5 tumors were classified as pT2a, 5 as pT2b, 30 as pT2c, 4 as pT3a, 3 as pT3b. After reviewing the MRI reports, the initial radiotherapy and hormonal therapy plan was changed in 33.9 % patients (35/103).
CONCLUSIONS: In our group of patients, 3TmMRI has been a reliable technique providing an optimal staging for prostate cancer. Its routine use could induce important changes in radiation therapy treatments in a significant number of such patients. However, more additional studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24865628     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1186-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Bohyun Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Ghee Young Kwon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Torricelli; Alessandro Barberini; Francesco Cinquantini; Maria Sighinolfi; Anna Maria Cesinaro
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Jelle Barentsz; Anders Bjartell; James Eastham; Hedvig Hricak; Valeria Panebianco; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Mullerad; Hedvig Hricak; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Darko Pucar; Hui-Ni Chen; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.

Authors:  J A Smith; P T Scardino; M I Resnick; A D Hernandez; S C Rose; M J Egger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Ming-Hui Chen; Robert V Mulkern; Fiona M Fennessy; Anthony V D'Amico; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables.

Authors:  H Augustin; G A Fritz; T Ehammer; M Auprich; K Pummer
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Akira Yamamoto; Takenori Yamashita; Naoto Egashira; Shigeki Imai; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Michael Mullerad; Hui-Ni Chen; Steven C Eberhardt; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus Partin tables and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram in risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer referred to external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Pancot; Marco Andrea Signor; Martina Urbani; Luca Balestreri; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jennifer Salerno; Antonio Finelli; Chris Morash; Scott C Morgan; Nicholas Power; Nichola Schieda; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Evaluation of tumor recurrences after radical prostatectomy using 18F-Choline PET/CT and 3T multiparametric MRI without endorectal coil: a single center experience.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Manuel Recio; Antonio Maldonado; Elia Del Cerro; Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela; Israel J Thuissard; David Sanz-Rosa; Francisco José Marcos; Karmele Olaciregui; María Mateo; Laura Cerezo
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer before radical and salvage radiotherapy: What radiation oncologists need to know.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Gemma Sancho; Violeta Catalá; Diana Hernández; Manuel Recio; Sara Montemuiño; Jhonathan Alejandro Hernández; Antonio Maldonado; Elia Del Cerro
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-10

5.  Local staging of prostate cancer with multiparametric-MRI: accuracy and inter-reader agreement.

Authors:  Cristian Popiţa; Anca-Raluca Popiţa; Adina Andrei; Adriana Rusu; Bogdan Petruţ; Gabriel Kacso; Cătălina Bungărdean; Nicolae Bolog; Ioan Coman
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-04-22

6.  Tumor staging using 3.0 T multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer: impact on treatment decisions for radical radiotherapy.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Elia Del Cerro; Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela; Francisco José Marcos; Manuel Recio; David Sanz-Rosa; Israel Thuissard; Karmele Olaciregui; María Mateo; Laura Cerezo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.