Literature DB >> 24863544

Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.

M M Koçak1, E Çiçek, S Koçak, B C Sağlam, N Yılmaz.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess and compare the amount of extruded debris after canal preparation using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next files.
METHODOLOGY: Forty extracted mandibular premolars with single canals and of similar lengths were instrumented using the ProTaper Universal F3 or the ProTaper Next X3. The extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The tubes were stored in an incubator for 5 days. The tubes were weighed to obtain the final dry weight of the extruded debris. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight of the tube from the final weight. The distribution of the data was examined using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Continuous variables were compared with an independent-samples t-test for two groups.
RESULTS: All specimens were associated with apical debris extrusion. The ProTaper Universal group produced a significantly greater amount of debris extrusion (P < 0.001). The lowest and highest amounts of debris for PTU and PTN groups were recorded as 0.00117-0.00165 g and 0.00017-0.00067 g, respectively.
CONCLUSION: ProTaper Next files was associated with significantly less extruded apical debris when compared to ProTaper Universal files.
© 2014 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ProTaper Next; ProTaper Universal; apical extrusion; debris

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24863544     DOI: 10.1111/iej.12313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  13 in total

1.  Apical extrusion of debris during the preparation of oval root canals: a comparative study between a full-sequence SAF system and a rotary file system supplemented by XP-endo finisher file.

Authors:  Anda Kfir; Rotem Moza-Levi; Moran Herteanu; Amir Weissman; Ronald Wigler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process.

Authors:  Ersan Çiçek; Mustafa Murat Koçak; Sibel Koçak; Baran Can Sağlam
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

3.  An In vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Reciproc, ProTaper Universal, Neolix and Hyflex in Curved Canals.

Authors:  Hossein Labbaf; Kiumars Nazari Moghadam; Shahriar Shahab; Mahshid Mohammadi Bassir; Mohammad Amin Fahimi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

4.  Comparison of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using instrumentation techniques with two operating principles: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mudita Verma; N Meena; R Anitha Kumari; Sudhanva Mallandur; R Vikram; Vishwas Gowda
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

5.  Influence of Different Irrigation Solutions and Instrumentation Techniques on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris.

Authors:  Camila Maia Maggi Silveira; Marcelo Voss Pimpão; Leonardo Alexandre Fernandes; Vania Portela Ditzel Westphalen; Bruno Cavalini Cavenago; Everdan Carneiro
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2019-11-19

6.  Shaping ability and apical debris extrusion after root canal preparation with rotary or reciprocating instruments: a micro-CT study.

Authors:  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva; Sara Gomes de Moura; Carolina Oliveira de Lima; Ana Flávia Almeida Barbosa; Waleska Florentino Misael; Mariane Floriano Lopes Santos Lacerda; Luciana Moura Sassone
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Comparison of apically extruded debris associated with several nickel-titanium systems after determining working length by apex locator.

Authors:  Ersan Çiçek; Oguzhan Akkocan; Fatma Furuncuoglu
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

8.  Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Ersan Çiçek; Mustafa Murat Koçak; Sibel Koçak; Baran Can Sağlam; Sevinç Aktemur Türker
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Anterior Teeth using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Ahsana Asif; Ganesh Jeevanandan; Lavanya Govindaraju; R Vignesh; E M G Subramanian
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

10.  Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study.

Authors:  Andressa Pinho Amaral; Patrícia Bastos Oliveira Conceição Limongi; Carlos Eduardo Fontana; Alexandre Sigrist De Martin; Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira Bueno; Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.