Literature DB >> 24862802

Adverse social determinants and risk for congenital anomalies.

Mariela S Pawluk1, Hebe Campaña1, Juan A Gili1, Belén Comas1, Lucas G Giménez1, María I Villalba1, Sandra C Scala1, Fernando A Poletta1, Jorge S López Camelo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Different studies have related familiar and regional adverse social conditions to perinatal outcome (neonatal mortality, low birth weight and prematurity); however, few studies have studied the effect of poverty on congenital anomalies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the hazard ratio of 25 congenital anomalies and adverse social determinants as per the socioeconomic level of families and regions. POPULATION AND METHODS: Exploratory, case-control study using data from the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (Estudio Colaborativo Latinoamericano de Malformaciones Congenitas, ECLAMC). The sample consisted of 3786 live newborn infants with a single malformation and 13,344 controls selected among 546,129 births occurred in 39 hospitals from Argentina in the 1992-2001 period. Both direct and indirect (residence) risks (OR) were estimated, together with the interaction between the individual and residential socioeconomic levels for each of the 25 congenital anomalies.
RESULTS: Cleft lip with/without cleft palate (OR= 1.43) and ventricular septal defect (OR= 1.38) showed a significantly higher risk in the lower socioeconomic level. Low socioeconomic levels were significantly associated with a higher frequency of parental sibship (blood relationship); native descent; maternal age younger than 19 years old; more than four pregnancies; a low number of antenatal care visits; and residence in deprived regions.
CONCLUSION: Cleft lip with/without cleft palate and ventricular septal defects were significantly associated with a lower socioeconomic level. Lack of family planning and antenatal care; and exposure to environmental or teratogenic agents may account for these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24862802     DOI: 10.5546/aap.2014.eng.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Argent Pediatr        ISSN: 0325-0075            Impact factor:   0.694


  4 in total

Review 1.  Medical foster care: what happens when children with medical complexity cannot be cared for by their families?

Authors:  Rebecca R Seltzer; Carrie M Henderson; Renee D Boss
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Geographic clusters of congenital anomalies in Argentina.

Authors:  Boris Groisman; Juan Gili; Lucas Giménez; Fernando Poletta; María Paz Bidondo; Pablo Barbero; Rosa Liascovich; Jorge López-Camelo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-08-19

Review 3.  Neighborhood Deprivation and Risk of Congenital Heart Defects, Neural Tube Defects and Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Séverine Deguen; Wahida Kihal; Maxime Jeanjean; Cindy Padilla; Denis Zmirou-Navier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Another piece of the Zika puzzle: assessing the associated factors to microcephaly in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luciana Guerra Gallo; Jorge Martinez-Cajas; Henry Maia Peixoto; Ana Carolina Esteves da Silva Pereira; Jillian E Carter; Sandra McKeown; Bruno Schaub; Camila V Ventura; Giovanny Vinícius Araújo de França; Léo Pomar; Liana O Ventura; Vivek R Nerurkar; Wildo Navegantes de Araújo; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.