Literature DB >> 24862763

Short-term effect of spinal manipulation on pain perception, spinal mobility, and full height recovery in male subjects with degenerative disk disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Felipe Vieira-Pellenz1, Angel Oliva-Pascual-Vaca2, Cleofás Rodriguez-Blanco2, Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo3, François Ricard4, Ginés Almazán-Campos4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term effect on spinal mobility, pain perception, neural mechanosensitivity, and full height recovery after high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation (SM) in the lumbosacral joint (L5-S1).
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial with evaluations at baseline and after intervention.
SETTING: University-based physical therapy research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Men (N=40; mean age ± SD, 38 ± 9.14 y) with diagnosed degenerative lumbar disease at L5-S1 were randomly divided into 2 groups: a treatment group (TG) (n=20; mean age ± SD, 39 ± 9.12 y) and a control group (CG) (n=20; mean age ± SD, 37 ± 9.31 y). All participants completed the intervention and follow-up evaluations.
INTERVENTIONS: A single L5-S1 SM technique (pull-move) was performed in the TG, whereas the CG received a single placebo intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included assessing the subject's height using a stadiometer. The secondary outcome measures included perceived low back pain, evaluated using a visual analog scale; neural mechanosensitivity, as assessed using the passive straight-leg raise (SLR) test; and amount of spinal mobility in flexion, as measured using the finger-to-floor distance (FFD) test.
RESULTS: The intragroup comparison indicated a significant improvement in all variables in the TG (P<.001). There were no changes in the CG, except for the FFD test (P=.008). In the between-group comparison of the mean differences from pre- to postintervention, there was statistical significance for all cases (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: An HVLA SM in the lumbosacral joint performed on men with degenerative disk disease immediately improves self-perceived pain, spinal mobility in flexion, hip flexion during the passive SLR test, and subjects' full height. Future studies should include women and should evaluate the long-term results.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intervertebral disc degeneration; Intervertebral disc disease; Manipulation, spinal; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24862763     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  10 in total

1.  The effects of spinal manipulative therapy on lower limb neurodynamic test outcomes in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina Melanie Maxwell; Douglas Thomas Lauchlan; Philippa Margaret Dall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 2.  Potential mechanisms for lumbar spinal stiffness change following spinal manipulative therapy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Peter Jun; Isabelle Pagé; Albert Vette; Greg Kawchuk
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-03-23

3.  Effects of Complex Rehabilitation Program on Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients with Lumbar Disc Protrusion-Is Early Intervention the Best Recommendation?

Authors:  Emilian Tarcău; Dorina Ianc; Elena Sirbu; Doriana Ciobanu; Ioan Cosmin Boca; Florin Marcu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Differential patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy and their relation to spinal degeneration and post-treatment changes in disc diffusion.

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Eric C Parent; Sukhvinder S Dhillon; Narasimha Prasad; Dino Samartzis; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Treatment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Jingguo Xin; Yongjie Wang; Zhi Zheng; Shuo Wang; Shibo Na; Shaokun Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Differential Characterization of Two Kinds of Stem Cells Isolated from Rabbit Nucleus Pulposus and Annulus Fibrosus.

Authors:  Chenglin Sang; Xuecheng Cao; Fangjing Chen; Xuekang Yang; Yongxian Zhang
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 7.  Potential mechanisms for lumbar spinal stiffness change following spinal manipulative therapy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Peter Jun; Isabelle Pagé; Albert Vette; Greg Kawchuk
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-03-23

8.  Sham treatment effects in manual therapy trials on back pain patients: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolina Lavazza; Margherita Galli; Alessandra Abenavoli; Alberto Maggiani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Clinical Effectiveness and Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation for Spine Pain.

Authors:  Carlos Gevers-Montoro; Benjamin Provencher; Martin Descarreaux; Arantxa Ortega de Mues; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-25

10.  Optimizing treatment protocols for spinal manipulative therapy: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Jason A Sharpe; Elizabeth Lane; Doug Santillo; Tom Greene; Gregory Kawchuk
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.