Literature DB >> 24862761

Mechanisms of buffer therapy resistance.

Kate M Bailey1, Jonathan W Wojtkowiak2, Heather H Cornnell2, Maria C Ribeiro2, Yoganand Balagurunathan2, Arig Ibrahim Hashim2, Robert J Gillies3.   

Abstract

Many studies have shown that the acidity of solid tumors contributes to local invasion and metastasis. Oral pH buffers can specifically neutralize the acidic pH of tumors and reduce the incidence of local invasion and metastatic formation in multiple murine models. However, this effect is not universal as we have previously observed that metastasis is not inhibited by buffers in some tumor models, regardless of buffer used. B16-F10 (murine melanoma), LL/2 (murine lung) and HCT116 (human colon) tumors are resistant to treatment with lysine buffer therapy, whereas metastasis is potently inhibited by lysine buffers in MDA-MB-231 (human breast) and PC3M (human prostate) tumors. In the current work, we confirmed that sensitive cells utilized a pH-dependent mechanism for successful metastasis supported by a highly glycolytic phenotype that acidifies the local tumor microenvironment resulting in morphological changes. In contrast, buffer-resistant cell lines exhibited a pH-independent metastatic mechanism involving constitutive secretion of matrix degrading proteases without elevated glycolysis. These results have identified two distinct mechanisms of experimental metastasis, one of which is pH-dependent (buffer therapy sensitive cells) and one which is pH-independent (buffer therapy resistant cells). Further characterization of these models has potential for therapeutic benefit.
Copyright © 2014 Neoplasia Press, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24862761      PMCID: PMC4094835          DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  40 in total

1.  Acid treatment of melanoma cells selects for invasive phenotypes.

Authors:  Raymond E Moellering; Kvar C Black; Chetan Krishnamurty; Brenda K Baggett; Phillip Stafford; Matthew Rain; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Elena I Deryugina; James P Quigley
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 3.  Drug resistance and cellular adaptation to tumor acidic pH microenvironment.

Authors:  Jonathan W Wojtkowiak; Daniel Verduzco; Karla J Schramm; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Phosphoinositide 3-kinase is involved in the tumor-specific activation of human breast cancer cell Na(+)/H(+) exchange, motility, and invasion induced by serum deprivation.

Authors:  S J Reshkin; A Bellizzi; V Albarani; L Guerra; M Tommasino; A Paradiso; V Casavola
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Migration of human melanoma cells depends on extracellular pH and Na+/H+ exchange.

Authors:  Christian Stock; Birgit Gassner; Christof R Hauck; Hannelore Arnold; Sabine Mally; Johannes A Eble; Peter Dieterich; Albrecht Schwab
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis?

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis.

Authors:  Erik Sahai; Christopher J Marshall
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  The relevance of tumour pH to the treatment of malignant disease.

Authors:  J L Wike-Hooley; J Haveman; H S Reinhold
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites.

Authors:  Ann F Chambers; Alan C Groom; Ian C MacDonald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  Cysteine cathepsins: from structure, function and regulation to new frontiers.

Authors:  Vito Turk; Veronika Stoka; Olga Vasiljeva; Miha Renko; Tao Sun; Boris Turk; Dušan Turk
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-10-12
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic changes associated with tumor metastasis, part 1: tumor pH, glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway.

Authors:  Valéry L Payen; Paolo E Porporato; Bjorn Baselet; Pierre Sonveaux
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Gear Up for a pH Shift: A Responsive Iron(II) 2-Amino-6-picolyl-Appended Macrocyclic paraCEST Agent That Protonates at a Pendent Group.

Authors:  Pavel B Tsitovich; Jordan M Cox; Joseph A Spernyak; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Concurrent Longitudinal EPR Monitoring of Tissue Oxygenation, Acidosis, and Reducing Capacity in Mouse Xenograft Tumor Models.

Authors:  Andrey A Bobko; Jason Evans; Nicholas C Denko; Valery V Khramtsov
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.194

4.  Inhibition of SW620 human colon cancer cells by upregulating miRNA-145.

Authors:  Chen Li; Na Xu; Yu-Qiang Li; Yu Wang; Zhi-Tu Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Cancer heterogeneity and metastasis: life at the edge.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  E2F1 enhances glycolysis through suppressing Sirt6 transcription in cancer cells.

Authors:  Minghui Wu; Edward Seto; Jingsong Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-05-10

7.  Metabolic Profiling of healthy and cancerous tissues in 2D and 3D.

Authors:  Shonagh Russell; Jonathan Wojtkowiak; Andy Neilson; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Tumor microenvironment-responsive nanoparticles for cancer theragnostic applications.

Authors:  Saji Uthaman; Kang Moo Huh; In-Kyu Park
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2018-08-23

9.  T-cells produce acidic niches in lymph nodes to suppress their own effector functions.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Veronica Estrella; Matthew Beatty; Dominique Abrahams; Asmaa El-Kenawi; Shonagh Russell; Arig Ibrahim-Hashim; Dario Livio Longo; Yana K Reshetnyak; Anna Moshnikova; Oleg A Andreev; Kimberly Luddy; Mehdi Damaghi; Krithika Kodumudi; Smitha R Pillai; Pedro Enriquez-Navas; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Pawel Swietach; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  What is pH regulation, and why do cancer cells need it?

Authors:  Pawel Swietach
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 9.264

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.