BACKGROUND: Prior studies reveal that bone mineral density (BMD) in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is mostly in the osteopaenic range and is associated with lifetime glucocorticoid dose. The forearm, a measure of cortical bone density, has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate BMD at various sites, including the forearm, and the factors associated with low BMD in CAH patients. METHODS: Eighty CAH adults (47 classic, 33 nonclassic) underwent dual-energy-x-ray absorptiometry and laboratory and clinical evaluation. BMD Z-scores at the AP spine, total hip, femoral neck, forearm and whole body were examined in relation to phenotype, body mass index, current glucocorticoid dose, average 5-year glucocorticoid dose, vitamin D, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS). RESULTS: Reduced BMD (T-score <-1 at hip, spine, or forearm) was present in 52% and was more common in classic than nonclassic patients (P = 0·005), with the greatest difference observed at the forearm (P = 0·01). Patients with classic compared to nonclassic CAH, had higher 17-hydroxyprogesterone (P = 0·005), lower DHEAS (P = 0·0002) and higher non-traumatic fracture rate (P = 0·0005). In a multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, gender, height standard deviation, phenotype and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, higher DHEAS was independently associated with higher BMD at the spine, radius and whole body. CONCLUSION: Classic CAH patients have lower BMD than nonclassic patients, with the most affected area being the forearm. This first study of forearm BMD in CAH patients suggests that low DHEAS may be associated with weak cortical bone independent of glucocorticoid exposure. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies reveal that bone mineral density (BMD) in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is mostly in the osteopaenic range and is associated with lifetime glucocorticoid dose. The forearm, a measure of cortical bone density, has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate BMD at various sites, including the forearm, and the factors associated with low BMD in CAH patients. METHODS: Eighty CAH adults (47 classic, 33 nonclassic) underwent dual-energy-x-ray absorptiometry and laboratory and clinical evaluation. BMD Z-scores at the AP spine, total hip, femoral neck, forearm and whole body were examined in relation to phenotype, body mass index, current glucocorticoid dose, average 5-year glucocorticoid dose, vitamin D, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS). RESULTS: Reduced BMD (T-score <-1 at hip, spine, or forearm) was present in 52% and was more common in classic than nonclassic patients (P = 0·005), with the greatest difference observed at the forearm (P = 0·01). Patients with classic compared to nonclassic CAH, had higher 17-hydroxyprogesterone (P = 0·005), lower DHEAS (P = 0·0002) and higher non-traumatic fracture rate (P = 0·0005). In a multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, gender, height standard deviation, phenotype and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, higher DHEAS was independently associated with higher BMD at the spine, radius and whole body. CONCLUSION:Classic CAHpatients have lower BMD than nonclassic patients, with the most affected area being the forearm. This first study of forearm BMD in CAH patients suggests that low DHEAS may be associated with weak cortical bone independent of glucocorticoid exposure. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: A B Sopher; J C Thornton; M E Silfen; A Manibo; S E Oberfield; J Wang; R N Pierson; L S Levine; M Horlick Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Gabriela P Finkielstain; Mimi S Kim; Ninet Sinaii; Miki Nishitani; Carol Van Ryzin; Suvimol C Hill; James C Reynolds; Reem M Hanna; Deborah P Merke Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: D P Merke; G P Chrousos; G Eisenhofer; M Weise; M F Keil; A D Rogol; J J Van Wyk; S R Bornstein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas Remer; Kai R Boye; Michaela Hartmann; Christina M Neu; Eckhard Schoenau; Friedrich Manz; Stefan A Wudy Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: L L Iervolino; B Ferraz-de-Souza; R M Martin; F C Costa; M C Miranda; B B Mendonça; T S Bachega Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Hedi L Claahsen-van der Grinten; Phyllis W Speiser; S Faisal Ahmed; Wiebke Arlt; Richard J Auchus; Henrik Falhammar; Christa E Flück; Leonardo Guasti; Angela Huebner; Barbara B M Kortmann; Nils Krone; Deborah P Merke; Walter L Miller; Anna Nordenström; Nicole Reisch; David E Sandberg; Nike M M L Stikkelbroeck; Philippe Touraine; Agustini Utari; Stefan A Wudy; Perrin C White Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Miguel Debono; Ashwini Mallappa; Verena Gounden; Aikaterini A Nella; Robert F Harrison; Christopher A Crutchfield; Peter S Backlund; Steven J Soldin; Richard J Ross; Deborah P Merke Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 6.664