Linda M Chatters1, Robert Joseph Taylor2, Amanda Toler Woodward3, Emily J Nicklett4. 1. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program for Research on Black Americans, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: chatters@umich.edu. 2. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program for Research on Black Americans, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 4. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of church- and family-based social support on depressive symptoms and serious psychological distress among older African Americans. METHODS: The analysis is based on the National Survey of American Life. Church- and family-based informal social support correlates of depressive symptoms (CES-D) and serious psychological distress (K6) were examined. Data from 686 African Americans aged 55 years or older who attend religious services at least a few times a year are used in this analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis found that social support from church members was significantly and inversely associated with depressive symptoms and psychological distress. Frequency of negative interactions with church members was positively associated with depressive symptoms and psychological distress. Social support from church members remained significant but negative interaction from church members did not remain significant when controlling for indicators of family social support. Among this sample of churchgoers, emotional support from family was a protective factor and negative interaction with family was a risk factor for depressive symptoms and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation of the relationship between church- and family-based social support and depressive symptoms and psychological distress among a national sample of older African Americans. Overall, the findings indicate that social support from church networks was protective against depressive symptoms and psychological distress. This finding remained significant when controlling for indicators of family social support.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of church- and family-based social support on depressive symptoms and serious psychological distress among older African Americans. METHODS: The analysis is based on the National Survey of American Life. Church- and family-based informal social support correlates of depressive symptoms (CES-D) and serious psychological distress (K6) were examined. Data from 686 African Americans aged 55 years or older who attend religious services at least a few times a year are used in this analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis found that social support from church members was significantly and inversely associated with depressive symptoms and psychological distress. Frequency of negative interactions with church members was positively associated with depressive symptoms and psychological distress. Social support from church members remained significant but negative interaction from church members did not remain significant when controlling for indicators of family social support. Among this sample of churchgoers, emotional support from family was a protective factor and negative interaction with family was a risk factor for depressive symptoms and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation of the relationship between church- and family-based social support and depressive symptoms and psychological distress among a national sample of older African Americans. Overall, the findings indicate that social support from church networks was protective against depressive symptoms and psychological distress. This finding remained significant when controlling for indicators of family social support.
Authors: James S Jackson; Myriam Torres; Cleopatra H Caldwell; Harold W Neighbors; Randolph M Nesse; Robert Joseph Taylor; Steven J Trierweiler; David R Williams Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Jill B Hamilton; Valarie C Worthy; Angelo D Moore; Nakia C Best; Jennifer M Stewart; Mi-Kyung Song Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Dawne M Mouzon; Robert Joseph Taylor; Verna M Keith; Emily J Nicklett; Linda M Chatters Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 3.485